Lucas & Hathway: Lawyers Needed in Saskatchewan.

Mr Hathway has been incarcerated for over two years at the Saskatoon Correction Centre. He was charged in the 1998 stabbing death of his landlord.

Mr Hathway was subjected to the RCMP Mr Big Sting. This sting is used to obtain a confession when there is no credible evidence of guilt. It is used to obtain a confession after a profile discloses a weakness in character, alcohol, past criminal convictions, drug abuse or the violability of youth.

In Mr Hathway’s case it was his past alcohol abuse. Get him off the wagon, out of school, get him drunk, engage him in illegal activities, lead him down the gardener path with no way out but a confession.

The evidence at the preliminary hearing was banned from publication, this is normal, what is not normal is the extent of the publication ban that relies on new terrorism legislation enacted after 9/11.

The preliminary hearing was turned into a court procedure resembling Abbott and Costello famous "Who's on first" radio skit.

Mr Hathway is not a threat to Canada’s national security. Withholding full disclosure by the Crown to Mr Hathway can not be justified as being a threat to Canada’s national security.

Mr Hathway’s Motion for a full disclosure was high jacked by Mr. Justice Laing, the Saskatchewan Law Society and the federal justice department.

It was a failed attempt to further add to the growing number of laws written by judges in Canada. Judges writing laws in secret courts needs to end in Canada. Elected members of government write laws, after an open debate in public and the press. If the politicians get it wrong in Canada’s vote splitting minority rules form of government then it is freedom of speech, and the press, that protect the Constitution and Mr Hathway’s right to a fair, and just trial.

From the news media:

“charged in the 1998 stabbing death of his 84-year-old landlord”

I don’t like people who would do that to a 84 year old.

“He shouted at Klause on occasion and once stood up in the prisoner's box prepared to fight. He also called a police witness a liar.”

I don’t like people who have no respect for the court and police officers.

“Klause has suggested information may have been misplaced by Hathway's two previous lawyers (both of whom were fired by Hathway).”

This guy must be unstable, firing two “real lawyers”.

“His previous lawyer, Robert Borden, withdrew from the case in mid-January.”

Must be guilty, his lawyer quit on him.

Do not prejudge Mr Hathway.

The Crown was ordered to provide Mr Hathway with disclosure material in the Saskatoon Correction Centre. Mr Hathway is not represented by a lawyer. The CTV’s W-Five has been refused entry into the Correction Centre to interview Mr Hathway. The news media is not going to take directions from non-lawyers, a lawyer will not take directions from a non-lawyer.

Mr Hathway would have been just another victim of the administration of justice in Saskatchewan had he not received the help of non-lawyers with a working understanding of the history of corruption within Saskatchewan Justice and the Saskatoon Police Service. This is the only reason for the news coverage at his otherwise secret preliminary hearing.

Mr Hathway will not receive a fair trial in a corrupt Saskatchewan court.

The Crown requested that John Lucas, who is charged with defaming Justice Paul Hrabinsky make application to the court for the removal of Justice Malone as the trial judge at his upcoming October, 2006 jury trial. Mr Lucas told the Crown prosecutor to do his own dirty work and upon hearing the request of the Crown a justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench stopped the court proceedings.

A request was made by the judge/judges to both Saskatchewan Chief Justices to have a Court of Appeal Judge hear the lower court jury trial. It was clear that a justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench was concerned that Mr Lucas would not receive a fair trial in Court of Queen’s Bench under the control of corrupt judges.

The request was denied, justice Malone removed himself as the trial judge and the same judges that appointed Justice Malone appointed Queen’s Bench Justice Ball as the new trial judge. This is a good example of how Saskatchewan Justice suckers an honest judge into protecting a corrupt court and corrupt judges.

There is no question that Mr Lucas is being maliciously prosecuted by corrupt judges in corrupted court proceedings.

Mr Hathway is in the same court and he is claiming that he is being maliciously prosecuted.

Mr Lucas has a gag order that prevents him from talking about his case. Mr Hathway is locked up with his disclosure documents. They both need legal representation that is not available in Saskatchewan. There is not a hope in hell of them having a Saskatchewan lawyer represent them.

It is time that the Parliament of Canada and elected representatives started protecting the Charter Rights of Canadians. The federal justice department must protect Canadians when the provincial government of Saskatchewan refuses to act when there is a clear history of judicial corruption within the courts and Saskatchewan Justice.

Order a judicial stay of proceedings in the Lucas case or appoint a lawyer of his choice from outside Saskatchewan. Take the self-serving gag order, wipe and flush it along with the stink from Saskatchewan Justice.

Let Mr Hathway out on bail. He has Charter Rights, locking him up in remand for over two years is cruel and unusual punishment.

Keeping Mr Hathway locked up in a cell with boxes full of disclosure that he is responsible for without his having legal representation is an invitation to a disaster. Get the disclosure properly organised on CD’s. a computer in his cell or give him access to one of the jail computers without any keyboard jackoff mess.

The Government of Canada can not continue to ignore the corruption in Saskatchewan. A full public inquiry into the administration of justice would have helped over ten years ago. It would have saved the tax payers of Saskatchewan the millions that have been paid out in damages and on corrupt court proceeding.

Clean out the judicial rot from Saskatchewan Justice before the next appointment to the Supreme Court of Canada.