Sunday, April 30, 2006

Hathway: Police State?

In the case of Michael Bridges the RCMP had evidence before the sting that he was involved in the murder of his girl friend. There was no evidence that Wilfred Hathway was involved in the murder of his landlord. He confessed because he believed he would have ended up dead at the hands of a criminal gang if he did not confess. Mr Hathway had no way of knowing that the criminal gang members were RCMP officers.

After two years in jail Richard Klassen filed a motion on behalf of Mr Hathway asking for a full disclosure. Mr Hathway received the disclosure in his cell. The disclosure was smuggled out of the correction centre and Richard Klassen filed a further motion asking for a Judicial Interim Release Hearing.

From injusticebusters;

The brief with its 54 tabs is comprehensive and clear. When Judge Rothery reads it, she will not be misled; she will be led through a maze which anyone can see is deliberate obfuscation by the Crown. It is rare that the details of a wrongful conviction have been put in place so clearly before the conviction has occurred. The judge is placed in the unprecedented position of having the opportunity to stop this one from happening.

The hearing was heard on April 21 by Judge Rothery and she reserved her decision. The one sided reporting by the StarPhoenix is understandable as the bans prevented the media from reporting on anything but the two year on going banter between the Crown and defence team. When serious accusations were made about a Saskatoon Police Officer and a Crown prosecutor the StarPhoenix stopped reporting on the Hathway case. There was not one word about the April 21st hearing in the StarPhoenix.

This is not about the guilt or innocence of Wilfred Hathway. It is about a fair trial for Mr Hathway. He is entitled to a full disclosure from the Crown. If this disclosure shows the police to have manufactured evidence and the Crown prosecutor knowingly withheld this disclosure then the new terrorism laws are being used to maliciously prosecute Mr Hathway. If the publication ban on the evidence extends to anything related to the police including their method of operation then we have a police state.

Hathway: W5 forum

Hathway: CTV Forums - W-FIVE

Friday, April 28, 2006

Hathway: Thank you W5

Wilfred Hathway has been locked up in the Saskatoon Correction Centre for the past two years. A publication ban under a relatively new section of the Criminal Code that was added following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the United States is being used to deny Mr Hathway his Charter Rights. He is not a terrorist, he is being treated like one.

The following was reported in the Saskatoon StarPhoenix.

Lawyer Reynold Robertson, who represented The StarPhoenix and the CBC argued that the public should know how the police go about establishing their evidence.

Evidence presented in a preliminary hearing is customarily banned but Jeffrey Hayes, a lawyer representing the investigating police service wants the ban to also be in place if the matter proceeds to trial in open court.

Reynold Robertson, argued that the public should know how the police go about establishing their evidence. The publication ban was ordered despite protests from lawyers representing the media and the accused.

Under the section of the Criminal Code cited for the ban, publication of anything related to the police is also prohibited including their method of operation.

Mr Hathway’s lawyer speaking to media outside the courthouse said he was perturbed by the bans. The following was reported in the Saskatoon StarPhoenix.

"There seems to be an order here, there and everywhere prohibiting the media and prohibiting the accused and others from disseminating any information. I can't tell you very much, other than what you've read in the newspaper (Tuesday) morning," he said. The Saskatoon StarPhoenix published a story about Hathway and his arrest in May 2004 prior to the ban being granted.

"This is a situation where we have to be tight lipped about everything". "We live in a democratic society, a constitutional society, and we like to see information disseminated as much as possible so that people can talk about the case, witnesses can come forth and we can all get a better understanding in the sense of what's right and just. "We just cannot have secrecy. We cannot have a situation where we're afraid to talk to each other about cases. My God, didn't that happen in the Klassen-Kvello case? Didn't it happen in the Martensville case? Didn't it happen in Milgaard?" "This has got to stop and I hope it stops with this case, because it certainly didn't stop with those others."

"If the police had evidence against my client in 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, or 2002, why didn't they charge him then?" "What was it that happened in 2003 and 2004 that led to these charges?"

"When you don't have any evidence against somebody what do you do? You try to extort a confession, force a confession, use coercion and threats. I'm not sure that's what we should do in a democratic society,"

"We do not want the media prohibited from reporting on the proceedings. The way it is worded, it even prohibits defence counsel from speaking about it if something 'tends' to reveal the identities. Lots of things will 'tend' to do that. I won't give his name or a physical description but I intend to talk as much as possible about this."

Mr Hathway’s lawyer said sometimes police use deception, manipulation and coercion to extract confessions and some of those confessions turn out to be false.

Hathway's lawyer claims his client was coerced into illegal activities by the undercover officers and his participation was used against him to pry out a confession.

Mr Hathway’s preliminary hearing is best described as legal folly’s. At one time a sheriff’s deputy threatened to shut down the proceedings. This was a result of Mr Hathway’s lawyer’s request that Hathway be given a pencil and notepad. He was not allowed to address the court. This prompted Mr Hathway to say "Everyone's here because of me and I can't say a damn thing. Nothing"

Mr Hathway fired two lawyers and his last lawyer quit saying that Mr Hathway has a strong case. Mr Hathway received help from Richard Klassen and Angie Geworsky to file motions for a full disclosure. Fact is in Saskatoon as seen in one travesty of justice after another lawyers will not, and can not properly represent their clients when accusations are made against the Saskatoon Police and Saskatchewan Justice about yet another travesty of justice.

This was made very clear at the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal when a lawyer said that he believed the Johanna Lucas and Richard Klassen case was a travesty of justice. This lawyer was told by a Justice of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal to, “sit down, shut up, and do not say another word.” That’s Saskatchewan Justice. Johanna Lucas has a web site, [url][/url]. She is posting the truth about the 8 year old Ross twins who were full wards of the court and were knowing left by Saskatchewan Justice and Social Services to be raped by their older brother for four years. She was jailed in 1995 for trying to help all three Ross children. She is a old age pensioner now in failing health, she and her husband have been malicious persecuted for over 12 years by Saskatchewan Justice for telling the truth about what happened to the Ross children in Saskatchewan.

The article By ROBERT MATAS, Globe and Mail, October 26, 2005 is the first time that I have read anything in the media about the two twin 8 year old girls who were left to be sexually assaulted for four years in Saskatoon.

Saskatoon lawyer Robert Borden is quoted as saying , “She also told the social worker that she was being sexually assaulted by a sibling, and the social worker left her with the sibling for four years.” There was nothing reported in the Saskatoon StarPhoenix.

The people of Saskatoon are treated like mushrooms, sit us in a dark corner and feed us BS. We need a newspaper in Saskatoon. The Saskatoon StarPhoenix by any stretch of the imagination can not be called a newspaper. One injustice after another and the people of Saskatoon have to get the news from injusticebusters, national newspapers, Fifth Estate and W5. The people knew very little about the Richard Klassen malicious prosecution case until the Fifth Estate ignored the publication bans and threats from Saskatchewan Justice and broadcast the Scandal of the Century story.

The news media has a responsibly to the public to ask questions, investigate stories and search for the truth. In many cases the media has failed to ask questions and will take something from the story and spin it to sell newspapers. This is what happened with the satanic child abuse cases in Saskatchewan. The question being asked by the editors and writers of the Edmonton Sun and the Globe and Mail; are there cults sacrificing and eating babies in Saskatoon? The StarPhoenix published articles on how the public could protect their children from cults who were sacrificing and eating babies. The result was a mass hysteria in Saskatoon that spread to Martinsville and many innocent lives being destroyed.

Saskatchewan Justice engaged in a 15 year cover-up, the fools thought the public may loose confidence in the administration of justice if they were told the truth about the Ross children and the satanic ritual abuse hysteria. Judges who knowingly left 8 year old children to be raped should be removed from the court.

Here is a fact that is becoming clearer in a Saskatoon court room. It is becoming harder and harder for the known hand full of corrupt judges in Saskatoon to get away with their corrupt court proceedings. This was very clear when Justice Malone was asked by the Crown to remove himself as the trial judge in the John Lucas case. I see no difference in Mr Hathway asking that a prosecutor be replaced, the secret court does not allow the public to know the details of the accusations of manufacturing evidence because of the publication ban, but the history of the court, Saskatoon Police Service and the Saskatoon prosecutors office in Saskatoon is well known and speaks for itself.

Mr Hathway filed a motion with help from Richard Klassen and Angie Geworsky. After two years the court ordered the Crown to supply Mr Hathway with disclosure required by law. It was ordered that Mr. Hathway retain such disclosure material in his cell at the Saskatoon Correctional Centre, and not remove any document from the disclosure from his cell for any purpose. That he not reproduce the disclosed material or store it in a retrieval system or transmit it in any form.

As reported on injusticebusters Mr Hathway; “sent out manila envelopes via the mail to Richard Klassen and Angie Geworsky. When they opened the envelopes they found it to be all new disclosure with "fresh" evidence. Also smuggled out were two video tapes. One more envelope arrived today (April 13, 2006) in which contained more damning evidence of police perjury. Mr. Hathway felt that he had no other option but to break Justice Laing's fiat. He did not have access to a computer to properly prepare a legal brief on his own behalf. He sent the information to Mr. Klassen and Angie Geworsky to prepare a proper legal brief. This brief was filed at 4P.M. today April 13, 2006 on behalf of Mr. Hathway for his Judicial Interim Release Application set for April 21, 2006, 10:00 a.m.. The brief and all supporting documentation and evidence is now in the hands of the Court of Queens Bench.”

I attended the hearing on April 21. What I witnessed was a personal vendetta by the Crown prosecutor against Richard Klassen. I believe this vendetta started in June 1994 when Mr Klassen wrote a letter to this prosecutor. Mr Klassen and his family were being slandered and insulted in court proceeding for over 10 years by Crown prosecutors, judges and Saskatoon Police. This ended with the Baynton judgement that found a Crown prosecutor, child therapist and Saskatoon police officer guilty of maliciously prosecuting the Richard Klassen family. The court room is not a place to engage in personal vendettas. Mr Hathway is the one that is charged, not Mr Klassen.

Saskatchewan Justice conducts secret courts where the public and the media are not allowed in the court. The evidence known to the public before a publication ban and gag order may not be enough to conclude that someone is guilty. When the court issues a gag order and the evidence is secret it is clear that it is the secrecy that is the determining factor in issuing the gag order.

I overheard someone during a brake in the proceedings suggesting that Richard Klassen change his last name to; Mr Richard “I am not a member of the Saskatchewan Law Society.”

Mr Hathway was served with an affidavit just before the hearing. He was allowed to answer the affidavit in court. Paragraph by paragraph he responded with documents and photos. Mr Hathway turned to eye ball a Saskatoon police officer and call him a liar, I had no trouble hearing him. I don’t think this will serve him well, I may not think its appropriate, but it is understandable.

The Saskatoon StarPhoenix did not report on this hearing. The newspaper has in the past not published stories that would leave a negative view of this small community. The Curtis Malinowski trial is a good example. It was only after being contacted by posters on the W5 forum that the StarPhoenix covered the story.

The number of cases based on false confessions and detailing the methods used by the RCMP to obtain questionable confessions and convictions is alarming. What is more alarming is that the publication ban in the Hathway case extends to anything related to the police, including their method of operation. This is claimed to be needed to protect RCMP officers in future RCMP Mr Big stings. What is being protected, their method of operation, that is well known, or is it the degree to which a confession is voluntary?

The publication bans prevent the media from reporting on the Hathway case. This is what happened in the Ross, Ross and White case in Saskatchewan. The media and the public were banned, not only from publishing, the media and public were banned from the court room. This was the first of the satanic child abuse cases in Saskatchewan. This travesty of justice and cover-up resulted in Richard Klassen dragging Saskatchewan justice, kicking and screaming to the truth for over 10 years.

The Mr Big story could result in a fair trial for Mr Hathway in Saskatoon. Many people including the editors of the StarPhoenix have demanded a public inquiry into the administration of justice in Saskatchewan. Until that happens there will be more persecutions and malicious prosecutions in Saskatoon. The people of Saskatoon have a right to know what is happening in the courts in Saskatoon. The John Lucas case is set for October, 2006. The Ross twins filed a Statement of Claim, paragraph 20 is below.

20. Particulars of the immediately preceding paragraph are as follows;

a. Each of the Plaintiffs had been repeatedly sexually assaulted by Michael Ross between 1990 and 1996.

b. The Defendants knew that Michael Ross was sexually assaulting each of the Plaintiffs.

c. The Plaintiffs were placed and returned on several different occasions to the same foster homes as Michael Ross.

d. No efforts or in the alternative Insufficient efforts, were made to prevent Michael Ross from sexually assaulting the Plaintiffs.

Canadians would be outraged by what happened to the 8 year old Ross twins and Johanna Lucas in Saskatchewan. As long as the editors of the Saskatoon StarPhoenix continue to huddle under Maxwell Smarts cone of silence the people of Saskatoon have to rely on the national news media and W5. A Mr Big thank you to W5.

CTV Forums - RCMP Mr Big: Thank you W5

Saskatchewan’s Shame


Sunday, April 23, 2006

Hathway W5, John Lucas: Up-date

John Lucas
Next hearing: Tuesday, April 25th at 11 AM.
This should be the next Saskatchewan injustice exposed on W5.

With the W5 program about Wilfrid Hathway he should receive a fair trial in the City of Injustice and corruption. The question is how many millions will the Hathway case cost the tax payers of Saskatchewan?

The people of Saskatchewan need to start demanding a full public inquiry into the administration of justice in Saskatoon. The inquiry will cost less then the damages for Mr Hathway, the Ross children, Johanna Lucas, John Lucas and all the others persecuted and maliciously prosecuted in Saskatoon.

We need a newspaper in Saskatoon. The Saskatoon StarPhoenix by any stretch of the imagination can not be called a newspaper. One injustice after another and the people of Saskatoon have to get the news from injusticebusters, national news papers, Fifth Estate and W5.

A judicial stay of proceeding in the Hathway and John Lucas case will save the people of Saskatchewan millions in damages. Clean up the corruption in Saskatoon and get the corrupt officers of the court and judges out of the courts.

John Lucas

  • Hathway W5, John Lucas: Up-date

  • Lucas: Sick justice

  • Milgaard, Lucas and corrupt judges

  • Judges: Judicial Gangsters, Common Thieves & blackmailers

  • Saskatoon of “What can we do?” Its, where do we start?

  • Hathway& John Lucas: Creditability of the Court of Queen’s bench is in Question

  • Lucas and Ross Children: It’s the tears

  • Je Me Souviens

  • Lucas & Hathway: Lawyers Needed in Saskatchewan

  • John Lucas: Strategy of Deception?

  • The Court of Queen’s Bench is a Sick Joke

  • Up-date: JOHN Lucas is allowed to talk to a lawyer - Next pre-trial February 16th 2006 Jury trial set for October 2nd, to 13th, 2006.

  • R v. Lucas - next Pre-Trial Conference - December 9, 2005

  • Injustice in The First-degree - John Lucas

  • Up-Date: A fair trial for John Lucas

  • Where is the news media, waiting for a publication ban?

  • John Lucas conditions of recognizance (Gag Order) Feb, 1994

  • Justice L. A. Kyle’s January 8th 2004 Gag Order

  • CCLA News: Supreme Court upholds criminal defamation

  • The Persecution of John Lucas 1993 - 2005 Home Page

  • CCLA - Other Interesting Sites
  • Saturday, April 22, 2006

    Hathway: W5 is a must see.

    CTV W-Five

    Saturday Apr. 22 at 7pm ET and Sunday Apr. 23 at 1pm ET

    A fair trial for Mr Hathway, you can bet on it and the other media are going to look like the fools they are. I think Mr Klause is in trouble. Way to go injusticebusters.

    Thursday, April 20, 2006

    W5: Methods used to catch criminals by RCMP

    CTV W-Five

    Saturday Apr. 22 at 7pm ET and Sunday Apr. 23 at 1pm ET

    Methods used to catch criminals by RCMP | W-FIVE | SAT 7pm / SUN 1pm

    Saturday, April 15, 2006

    Hrabinsky, Dovell: Canadian Judicial Council

    I am going to research the Canadian Judicial Council. The fact that Justice Hrabinsky and Justice Dovell are allowed to sit as judges in Saskatchewan is an affront to everything this country stands for. If one is not prepared to protect freedom and Charter Rights then one does not deserve them.

    Times are changing in Canada. Canadians are fed up with the judicial corruption in all areas of Canada from family courts, child protection on up to the spin doctors at the Supreme Court of Canada and the Canadian Judicial Council. Judges who protect their political pals from criminal charges need to be removed from the court. Delusional judges who believe in religious hysterias, sacrificing and eating babies and protecting officers of the court who left 8 year old girls to be raped for four years need to be removed from the courts in Saskatchewan.

    The Canadian Judicial Council has a disgusting history of protecting corruption and incompetent political patronage appointments to the courts in Canada. These judges are not the best legal minds in Canada, they are political hacks protecting a increasingly corrupt administration of justice. Canadian criminal courts are nothing more then a means of jailing Canadians at the lowest cost to government and the high cost of keeping them in jail allows the guilty go free. Judges have failed to protect Canadians from corrupt court proceedings. We can have inquiry after inquiry, blame it on the police and lawyers, nothing will change until these judges are removed from the courts and replaced with judges who base their judgements on common sense. The junk Canadian case law from corrupt judges who believe in cults and sacrificing babies and protecting politicians and officers of the court needs to be junked along with the judges.

    I will be making an application to the Canadian Judicial Council for the removal of Justice Paul Hrabinsky from the Saskatchewan Court of Queens Bench. Any help in researching past applications would be helpful. There is some information on line at The Canadian Court Watch Program and the Canadian Justice Review Board. The information on the Canadian Justice Review Board web site is not very encouraging for Canadians, it is a good look at how corrupt judges protect corrupt judges.

    After the application regarding Justice Hrabinsky I will be making an application to the Canadian Judicial Council for the removal of Justice Dovell from the Saskatchewan Court of Queens Bench.

    My being successful or not does not matter, what matters is that I do my best. I think the best way to demand a society where people are accountable, is to start at the bottom. Put the future of our children and grand children first. Personal injustice suffered by Canadians must take a back seat to the needs of future generations.

    Friday, April 14, 2006

    Hathway: Standing your ground in a corrupt court.

    Way to go Mr Hathway. A class act.

    From the injusticebusters web site.

    Hathway's disclosure is locked up in storage at the Saskatoon Correctional but his 31 page brief of fact and argument for his release, accompanied by a 54 tab document has been filed before Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench to be heard Friday, April 21.

    Not bad for a man that is being treated like he is a terrorist stripped of his charter rights and locked in a cell under a sweeping gag order and publication ban that belongs in the old USSR. He is being treated like a terrorist with no charter rights. He will not be able to get a lawyer in Saskatoon, they know better then to get involved in corrupt court proceedings involving the Saskatoon police and Saskatchewan justice.

    It is being claimed that a police officer tampered with evidence and gave perjured testimony during Hathway's preliminary inquiry and there has been manufactured evidence, police perjury, Crown witness perjury and withholding of disclosure.

    This is just normal for Saskatchewan. What is not normal is for someone standing in a Saskatchewan court demanding justice. Its bad enough when lawyers and police are corrupt. Mr Hathway has no choice but to proceed in a court with a history of corrupt judges who have for years protected corrupt officers of the court. Had it not been for people obtaining and distributing the disclosure in the satanic child abuse cases Saskatchewan Justice and Saskatoon police would have succeeded in lying to the public and burying the truth. Saskatchewan Justice continues to lie to the public.

    It is going to be a difficult wait for Mr Hathway until his hearing on Friday, April 21. I would think that the people helping him are also concerned, not only for Mr Hathway, the worry can be seen in the injusticebusters post. The publication ban needs to be removed from this case.


    Wilfred Gordon Hathway

  • Hathway: W5 is a must see.

  • W5: Methods used to catch criminals by RCMP

  • Hathway: Standing your ground in a corrupt court.

  • Hathway& John Lucas: Creditability of the Court of Queen’s bench is in Question.

  • Are they going to cut Hathway’s foreskin off?

  • Hathway: Corruption and Malice

  • Hathway: Saskatoon’s ongoing legal folly’s

  • Lucas & Hathway: Lawyers Needed in Saskatchewan

  • Hathway: CTV's W-Five

  • Hathway: Motion Chief Justice R D Lang

  • Crown warns Hathway to hire a “real lawyer“

  • Mr Hathway needs to start eating.

  • Wilfred Hathway: Who is in charge in this court room?

  • Wilfred Hathway: Was the confession voluntary?

  • Hathway case and the media.

  • Yelling for justice - Wilfred Hathway

  • "Cough 'em up Klause. Cough 'em up,"

  • Wilfred Hathway case
  • Thursday, April 13, 2006

    Lucas: Sick justice

    The withholding of documents and evidence from the defence is a slap in the face for all Canadians who paid for the many wrongful conviction inquires in Canada. The Lucas and Hathway cases are making a mockery of the David Milgaard inquiry in the home of corrupted justice, Saskatoon.

    The Lucas and Hathway cases have both been ongoing for over two years without a full disclosure of documents by the Crown. The law says a full disclosure must be made. Prosecutors claim that the defendant must make application to the court for a disclosure of documents, as long as judges continue to not protect the public and the law from weak, corrupt or in some cases where the prosecutor is maliciously prosecuting or has decided to cover-up a mistake nothing will change. The innocent will continue to be jailed in Saskatoon.

    Serious mistakes were made in the jailing of the parents of the Ross children. Saskatchewan Justice has lied and deceived the public for over 15 years. The evidence and documents were deliberately withheld from the court and Johanna Lucas was jailed and the 8 year old Ross twins were left to be raped for four years.

    Jeffrey Baldwin’s grandparents were found guilty of second-degree murder, the official cause of this five year old child’s death was septic shock, his body weakened by bacterial pneumonia suffered from sleeping in his own bodily wastes.

    The Catholic Children's Aid Society of Toronto are being sued along with people who had full knowledge of the condition and torture of Jeffrey Baldwin and his sister and did nothing to help these children. They should have been charged along with Jeffrey’s grandparents. Not charging them is an affront to the criminal code, accessory to the murder of a child.

    The withholding of documents and evidence at the trial of the Ross children’s parents was done deliberately. The only thing that would have made a difference in the outcome was for Saskatchewan Justice to admit that the trial was a result of a religious hysteria involving the police, prosecutors and judges.

    Saskatchewan justice decided to cover-up the witch hunt with the Court of Appeal judgement, banning the documents and evidence. The lies and deception became the focus of the court, there was no concern for the Ross children and as Terry Hinz stated in his deceive the public strategy letterthe real concern here lies in the abuse of disclosure.” The disclosure was being distributed by Johanna Lucas and showed that the Ross children were in serious danger in the Thompson special foster home.

    One of the people being sued in the Jeffrey Baldwin case said he did not report the abuse because he would have been kicked out of the house. Saskatchewan justice and social services personnel did nothing to help the Ross children, they were busy protecting their own interests by lying to a court that was only concerned that the public would find out about the withheld evidence and disclosure regarding the trial of the children’s parents. Jeffrey Baldwin was left to die by someone that wanted free rent. The Ross twins were left to be raped for four years by people who maliciously prosecuted innocent people.

    The Crown withheld evidence and documents from the court at the Johanna and John Lucas trial. It was the same documents and tapes withheld from the court at the trial of the Ross children’s parents. Johanna Lucas was maliciously prosecuted for distributing copies of the original documents and tapes in the possession of Saskatchewan justice that showed without question, and supported by the Baynton judgement that a prosecutor, social worker and police officer maliciously prosecuted the Klassen and Kvello families. These same documents clearly show that the Ross children’s parents were maliciously prosecuted by Saskatchewan Justice.

    John and Johanna Lucas have been saying for over 12 years that people who knew the Ross children were being raped and tortured in the Thompson special foster home and did nothing to help the Ross children are accessory to the rape and torture of the Ross twins. They were charged with defaming the police officer found guilty of maliciously prosecuting the Klassen and Kvello families. This police officer knowing left two 8 year old girls to be raped and tortured.

    One must have a belief in what is being said is true and the Crown must show the court that the Lucas’s knew that what they were saying about the police officer was not true. Their picket signs asked the public if the police officer was guilty of rape when he knowing left the Ross twins to be raped. The Crown argued that the Lucas’s did not have a belief in what they were saying because they were asking a question instead of saying, this police officer is guilty of rape for not helping the Ross twins. The people who knowing left Jeffrey Baldwin to die are as guilty as the grandparents and should be held responsible for their actions. People who left the Ross twins to be raped and tortured for four years are guilty of rape and torture and should be held responsible for their actions.

    No one, understood, or stated the Lucas argument regarding Dueck (police officer) better then the Chief Justice of The Supreme Court of Canada at the Lucas appeal. The Chief justice then supported Saskatchewan justice by saying that the Lucas’s said that the Thompson papers were unbelievable and that they did not believe the contents and in doing did not have a true belief in what they were saying. This head spin doctor then twisted the law and turned the words of everyone that read the Thompson papers and agreed that what they were reading about sacrificing babies, killing babies and drinking their blood was not the most unbelievable and incredible document they have ever read.

    This was after The Supreme Court of Canada heard the appeal of the Ross children’s parents. The Supreme Court of Canada by this time realised that the rule of law broke down at the trial of the Ross children’s parents and Saskatchewan justice was covering up this ritual sex abuse hysteria trial. If the court overturned the Lucas judgement by Justice Hrabinsky and the Saskatchewan Court of appeal judgement then not only would what was being said by Johanna Lucas be true about the police officer. Everyone who knew that the Ross twins were being raped and tortured and who did nothing to help them were protected because the protection of the administration of justice was more important for the Supreme Court of Canada then the rape of 8 year old girls.

    The Lucas trial is in October, John Lucas is again charged with defaming Justice Hrabinsky. This twelve year persecution of Johanna and John Lucas by corrupt judges, prosecutors and civil servants who left the Ross twins to be raped is sick and perverted. Prosecutors and police officers who leave children to be raped should be held accountable for their actions. Judges who leave children to be raped should be removed from the court. The Ross twins Statement of Claim needs to be amended to include the names of these judges and anyone else who left the girls to be raped.

    Monday, April 10, 2006

    Milgaard, Lucas and corrupt judges.

    The David Milgaard inquiry in Saskatoon is exposing the cover-up by Saskatchewan Justice after he was found guilty of murder. He was no different then most teenagers of the time, a hippy experimenting with soft drugs passing through Saskatoon. He was the victim of a small city police service who‘s officers were poorly trained, without proper supervision and hired on the bases of their ability to push their weight around. Grade eight bullies unable to pass the RCMP requirements for joining the national police force.

    This was typical of small city police forces of the time. Even some larger cities like Vancouver started cleaning up their police service years ago after pressure from the public. Saskatoon has failed to address the issue of corruption within the Saskatoon Police Service. If Saskatchewan justice had righted the wrong in jailing David Milgaard right after his conviction instead of covering it up for 23 years there may not have been a further cover-up in the Satanic Ritual child abuse cases in Saskatchewan.

    David Milgaard was jailed for 23 years by idiots who advanced to become respected leaders and judges in Saskatchewan. They then engaged in a cover-up that kept Mr Milgaard in jail for 23 years. Is it any wonder that Saskatchewan Justice was able to cover-up the Satanic child abuse conviction of the Ross children’s parents and the rape of two eight year old twin girls. Saskatchewan justice will come out of the Milgaard inquiry smelling like roses and the trial lawyers and Saskatoon Police Service will again be dumped on just like the prosecutors and police officer after the 10 year cover-up by Saskatchewan justice in the Klassen ritual child abuse case.

    I do not think anyone could argue that the best legal minds appointed to the bench in Canada were the returning solders from the two world wars. They are gone now and we are left with a hand full of corrupt judges fully experienced in covering up one travesty of justice after another in Saskatchewan.

    Case commentaries provided by the Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan posted on with respect to the trial of the children’s parents.

    “The Judge also drew inferences of malice on the part of Miazga based on his approach, attitude and conduct throughout the preliminary hearings and the criminal trial in which the children gave evidence. These included how the medical evidence was presented to the judge, how expert witnesses were used to prop up an otherwise hopeless case, how evidence was excluded that would have helped the judge assess the credibility of the allegations, particularly the evidence of the videotaped interviews of the children.”

    The Ross children’s parents were maliciously prosecuted by Saskatchewan Justice and Social Services and the people involved then continued on to the Martensville and Klassen cases and again maliciously prosecuted innocent people. Saskatchewan Social Service advertised for a special foster home for the Ross children. They were not looking for a home with parents with experience in the medical problems of the children, they were looking for a home with parents experienced in the ritual sex abuse of children. If you are wondering what is ritual sex abuse of children then read the notes made by one of the parents in the Thompson special foster home, the Thompson papers. (Link to notes: injusticebusters below) Nothing would have changed the outcome of the Ross children’s parents malicious prosecution. Saskatchewan justice and social services personal and ministers were overcome by a religious hysteria.

    After 16 months of Saskatchewan justice gagging the media, burying the evidence and attempting to get a conviction in the other cases the written judgement of the appeal of children’s parents conviction was upheld by the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal. Two judges up-held the conviction, had the third judge not agreed with the other two there would have been a risk of the people wondering if they were all nut cases who believed in sacrificing and eating babies. The only way out for Saskatchewan Justice was the Supreme Court of Canada ordering new trials and in good old Saskatchewan fashion stay the proceedings and continue to slander innocent people.

    Saskatchewan justice withheld documents and tapes from the court proceedings and lied to and deceived the judges of the Supreme Court of Canada. The strategy letter written by Terry Hinz to Wilfrid Tucker is an admission that Saskatchewan Justice lied and deceived the people of Saskatchewan.

    “At this point it appears that the community response to the postering campaign is to treat these people as part of a lunatic fringe. If we prosecute, we run the risk of making them martyrs and giving them a soap box to generate further publicity for themselves. Additionally, it may well be that if charged they could subpoena prosecutors, police etc, as “defence” witnesses in an attempt to prove that their allegations are true. For all the foregoing reasons, everyone agrees we should not take action at this time. However, we should not announce publicly that that is our position.”

    This is the same prosecutor that testified at the Klassen civil case when he was given the file by Brian Dueck, the police officer in charge of the investigation, after reading the file he was reminded of the Salem Witch trials and he refused to proceed with charges. It would seem that the Saskatchewan justice strategy changed between the time Mr Hinz wrote the letter and Justice Dovell announced that the Klassen case must proceed to trial. Saskatchewan justice’s new strategy was that Brian Dueck was going to be sacrificed and hung out to dry.

    April 9, 1997
    Mr. Hillson: — Mr. Speaker, a few years ago a criminal investigation in this province got so seriously off the rails that we had many people in this province and indeed throughout Canada believing that satanic child abuse was rampant in this province. How and why this happened was not part of the Court of Appeal case considered by our Court of Appeal, nor is it the focus of the present cases for malicious prosecution against our prosecutors. And of course the Martin inquiry was forbidden to look into this area.

    Hon. Mr. Nilson:

    Speculative comments were made in relation to possible ritual or satanic abuse from a number of different people called upon to comment. I don’t believe the Crown prosecutors ever characterized the abuse in this fashion, and no charges which supported so-called ritual or satanic activity were taken forward by the Crown. I ask that the members of this House be very careful in the facts that they state publicly before national television or anywhere else.

    Some Hon. Members: Hear, hear!

    There would have been a lot less, Here, Here’s had the members of the Saskatchewan Legislature been told the truth about the satanic child abuse cases and what happened to two 8 year old girls in the Thompson special foster home. There were members on both sides of the house who would not have been re-elected had the house and the public been told the truth.

    Johanna Lucas was jailed after the satanic child abuse conviction of the Ross children’s parents. She picketed the Saskatoon Police Service. She claimed the 8 year old Ross twins were in danger and being raped in the Thompson special foster home.

    Johanna Lucas was not the only one picketing. Christians were also picketing in Saskatoon. Their signs read “We believe the children”. The ritual abuse hysteria was a religious hysteria that resulted in the jailing of the Ross children's parents. Johanna Lucas was saying, look at the tapes of the children being interviewed by the police and read the notes of the foster parent not admitted into evidence at the trial.

    The Christians were reacting to the hysteria rumours being fuelled by the media and Saskatchewan justice. Both Johanna Lucas and the Christians had a mutual concern for the safety of the Ross children. It was not the religious hysteria, it was the safety of the Ross children that people were concerned about. The people of Saskatchewan are being lied to by Saskatchewan justice and the October trial of John Lucas needs to be covered by the news media. The people have a right to hear the truth about corrupt judges in Saskatchewan.

    The jailing of Johanna and John Lucas was a vicious misuse of the process of the court. Over 12 years of lies. The world will not come to an end by removing a hand full of corrupt judges from the bench in Saskatchewan. This should happen before the Klassen appeal, if the appeal is allowed to continue we can look forward to another corrupt judgement from the court of appeal who intend to blame it all on a police officer and two 8 year old girls the court left to be raped for four years.

    The Thompson papers. Injusticebusters

    Monday, April 03, 2006

    Judges: Judicial Gangsters, Common Thieves & blackmailers

    It is hard for anyone to understand what happened in Saskatchewan. Raving lunatics were in charge of Saskatchewan Justice, Saskatoon Police and Social Services. It was their bosses that were responsible for not stopping the stupidly at the first trial when the children’s parents were jailed. Unbelievable that people could be jailed based on the ranting of a police officer, prosecutor and a social worker. Did you listen to the Dueck Jabber “disclosures” recorded on tape by Brian Dueck, news at That was the evidence no one was allowed to here in court.

    The evidence of children in grave danger and being raped in the Thompson Special Foster Home was known by all the people involved including the local media and no one did anything to help the children. Sick justice, sick people. The public and the media were banned from the court room. The talk at the time of the trial in churches across Canada was about the Satanic Ritual Child abuse case in Saskatchewan where cult members were on trial for sacrificing and eating babies.

    Johanna and John Lucas were gagged and jailed by justice Hrabinsky, this sick man was protecting a police officer who left children to be raped and a bunch of religious nut cases. Saskatchewan Justice, Social Services, politicians and employees were making a documentary about cults and sacrificing and eating babies. They were going to be world famous for educating the judiciary and the public. Saskatchewan Justice, Saskatoon Police and Social Services circled the wagons and for over 10 years this sick bunch of nut cases gagged, banned and otherwise tried to bury the evidence using the law, the Court of Queen‘s Bench and Court of Appeal to jail Johanna and John Lucas. Sick justice.

    After Saskatoon police officers were wrongly charged with child abuse I watched the yearly exhibition parade, a man yelled at Saskatoon police officers marching, he was yelling at them calling them “baby f****s”. He was yelling at the wrong people.

    Everyone that Johanna Lucas contacted and provided with the tapes and documents is more then deserving of being called that and more. They left two 8 year old girls to be raped, for four years. They then separated the girls and moved them out of the province to foster homes in B C and Manitoba. Their own documents and tapes prepared for educating the courts and public can not be questioned, they clearly show the truth of what was done to the Ross children in the Thompson foster home. Having a butter knife jammed into a 8 year old girl would have sold lots of books for this sick bunch of jackasses.

    All the cases before the courts in Saskatoon one can read about in the newspaper or on the Law Society web site except one. The John Lucas case. Again the court has circled the wagons, first with a gag order and now secret courts and corrupt court proceeding to protect Justice Hrabinsky. Justice Hrabinsky protects corrupt former political lawyers and he does it with the help of Justice Dovell and again the same judges in the Court of Appeal responsible for covering up the rape of 8 year old girls and protecting the bosses of the police officer, social worker and Crown prosecutor who were sacrificed and found guilty of malicious prosecution.

    All the letters to the editor of the Saskatoon StarPhoenix about the removal of the Saskatoon Chief of Police clearly shows that the people of Saskatoon are sick of the corruption in Saskatoon. John Lucas has been charged with defaming Justice Paul Hrabinsky. Justice Hrabinsky is a lowlife piece of crap along with Justice Dovell and the Court of Appeal judges who left two 8 year old girls to be raped and protected corrupt lawyers and officers of the court.

    Remove the gag order from John Lucas and allow full reporting on his case. This pack of judicial gangsters are in control of corruption in Saskatoon and protect corrupt judges, police officers and lawyers. The federal justice department needs to hold their noses and investigate the illegal actions of this gang of misfits. The Ross children, myself, Johanna and John Lucas are Canadians, we do not live in some backwards country. The public has a right to hear the truth about Justice Hrabinsky. John Lucas will not receive a fair trial in a Saskatchewan court in the control of common thieves, blackmailers and judges who leave children to be raped.