Don Morgan, MLA
Thank you for your response Mr Morgan and your efforts on my behalf. You say that complaints to the Judicial Council or the Law Society about lawyers will clearly be met "with the predictable response that your remedy is in the courts or through the appellate process." The Judicial Council of Canada deals with complaints about federally appointed judges. A remedy is not in the courts Mr Morgan, the only remedy is the Judicial Council. There has never been a judge removed from office in Canada. The following is taken from the CanLaw web site:
Complaining about Judges is futile but you can always try at the CanadianJudicial Council a self serving incestuous little do nothing organization ifthere ever was one. They treat ordinary citizens with contemp andcondescension.
The response to a complaint to the Judicial Council is "predictable" A complaint to The Law Society of Saskatchewan about a lawyer is also "predictable". The editorial in the Saskatoon StarPhoenix on February 13, 2003 was titled "Law society abuses power." Have a read at injusticebusters.com, the court of Queen's Bench and the Law Society of Saskatchewan have no credibility.
Illegal actions by judges and lawyers is an issue that should be dealt with at all levels of Government. The court is the foundation for a democratic country. The Chief Justice of Canada travels the country singing the phrases of the Canadian legal system and the importance of a independent judicial system based on the Constitution. She says that there is no difference between health care and education for all and legal representation for all. The Builders lien act allows the placing of a caveat on the property of a homeowner without due process. I had no trouble understanding the Act. It was written by lawyers and is being used by dishonest lawyers to blackmail homeowners who can not afford huge legal costs. The homeowner has a degree in English and he could not understand it. The Act denied him due process by not allowing him to proceed in small claims court. A 173 motion to dismiss the false claim would have cost him no more then $1000.00 but he was referred to Brent Gough and forced to pay $5000.00. The blackmail started when the caveat was placed on his property. The homeowner was defrauded, Mr Stooshinoff was protected by Mr Gough, the Law Society and Justice Smith. The court is corrupt Mr Morgan. A homeowner was put into the hospital for three weeks because he dared to tell a judge that he was being blackmailed by a lawyer. The police officer understood the difference between a civil matter and a criminal matter, you seem to have trouble understanding this.
James Rugg failed to protect me and Justice Hrabinsky ignored hundreds of years of common law and denied me due process at the pre-trial. He insulted and threatened me. Their actions resulted in my being taken to emergency. Anyone who takes the time to look at the documents can see that I was set up and assaulted by Justice Dovell in her court room. I am in a wheelchair as a result. I have been denied due process in a manner that is illegal. Homeowners are being put into the hospital by lawyers and judges, I am a disabled man and I have been assaulted by lawyers and judges and put into a wheelchair. I am not the only citizen of Saskatchewan who has had their life destroyed by the Government of Saskatchewan and a corrupt court. Millions have been paid in damages and many more millions have been wasted on protecting this court. What is the cost for medical care for people who have had their health ruined by this court? Justice Hrabinsky, Smith and Dovell have abused their power, it is a clear abuse of the process of the court and you know it. It does not take 5 years of law school to see that. Any grade 8 student in this country who has read the Constitution and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms will tell you the same thing. Retaliation by the court for reporting an officer of the court to the police for illegal acts belongs in the old USSR. You have avoided the issues Mr Morgan. Your silence is understandable, you need to stand up in the house and demand a public inquiry into the administration of justice in Saskatchewan. Your response was predicable, the message that I get from your silence is that you will not be re-elected and if your party wins an election the corruption within the administration of justice will continue in Saskatoon.
James Hunter
Mr. Hunter
Thank you for your comments. I agree that work is needed to restore confidence in the justice syste. I do not agree with your comments regarding specific lawyers or judges. We have many hardworking lawyers, judges, prosecutors and police officers who should be recognized and commended for their achievements. We have to work to overcome some of the past issues and restore the sheen that we once had on our judicial system. There is no "conspiracy" or great plan to defraud the public. It is regrettable that your experiences have not been to your liking. I hope your future dealings are better.
Don Morgan, MLA
Mr Morgan
You are playing games Mr Morgan. What world are you living in? Of course there are many police officers and lawyers who should be recognised for their hard work and dedication. I have documented the hard work of a police officer who stood up for a homeowner being blackmailed by a lawyer. He also investigated for other homeowners who were being blackmailed with liens on their property. It was all for nothing. Go to injusticebusters.com. Do you think what is being said about Saskatchewan Justice, including Justice Hrabinsky and Dovell is some kind of, in your words not mine, a "conspiracy"?
What I do not understand is the silence from you and the other hardworking lawyers, judges, prosecutors and police officers. Do you always ignore the issues, the people who write to you, and when pressured into responding engage in games with them about a "conspiracy" about great plan to defraud the public.
I said in my email to you that your response was predicable. I was wrong Mr Morgan. Your responses are insulting. Not only to me, but to the people who have offered to help me and suggested that I write to you again and ask for a response from you.
James Hunter
Monday, December 27, 2004
Friday, December 17, 2004
What about the home owners?
I emailed Don Morgan the Saskatchewan Party Justice critic about a Builders Lien scam. He responded 6 months later after being pressured by Federal MP's in part with: "Our party supports the provisions of The Builder's Lien Act. It enables building material suppliers and tradespeople a remedy that is timely and affordable (at least in so far as registering the lien)." Mr Morgan and the Saskatchewan Party may have the support of building suppliers and trades people, but it is not just building suppliers and trades people that voted for them. It is also homeowners being blackmailed by the provisions of The Builders Lien Act in Saskatchewan that denies them a "timely and affordable" remedy to protect their legal rights in small claims court. Mr Morgan and his Saskatchewan Party have forgotten who they represent, the Saskatchewan Party does not just have the responsibility of "support of building suppliers and trades people", they have a responsibility to all Saskatchewan home owners who voted for them or not, they pay them to do it. If a builders lien that is "timely and affordable (at least in so far as registering the lien)" is placed on a Saskatchewan home owners property it will cost the home owner up to $15,000.00 in legal fees to have it removed, the home owners mortgage funds will be held in trust in a lawyers bank account collecting interest for the Saskatchewan Law Society. The homeowner will be referred to a $300.00 an hour lawyer, and the stress involved could put the home owner in the hospital. Mr Morgan and the Saskatchewan Political Party support thieves and blackmailers, what about the home owners?
James Hunter
James Hunter
Thursday, November 25, 2004
How soon we forget
The Saskatoon StarPhoenix fuelled a hysterical religious satanic child abuse nightmare in Saskatoon. It resulted in innocent people being charged and jailed. Innocent people had their lives destroyed and the StarPhoenix was stunningly silent. The rule of law broke down and the cover-up has cost the tax payers in Saskatchewan millions. Justices of the Court of Queen’s Bench have been stomping on the Charter Rights of these people for over ten years and the StarPhoenix again has been silent. For the past ten years the officers of the Saskatoon Police Service have been demoralized by editorials and citizens shouting outrageous accusations at them when marching in a parade in downtown Saskatoon.
Two officers paid the price and were jailed for a starlight ride that most, if not all police departments across Canada had been doing for years. I would think that the starlight rides have ended across Canada, lives have been saved as a result of a Saskatoon police officer taking a report that resulted in the two officers being charged. Do any of you know his name?
A police officer, therapist and prosecutor were found guilty of malicious prosecution. They are still receiving their pay cheques and the tax payers have again paid the price for the break down of the administration of justice. The StarPhoenix, in an article on the front page wanted to know what the settlement amount was in the Klassen case. I would like to know what it cost the tax payers for the court proceedings, the cover up, the jailing of innocent people, the medical costs to treat these people, their children and future medical costs.
The attorney general had no problem telling the people what the lawyer was paid in the Sterling settlement. Why is he not telling the tax payers what it cost them to starve these people into a settlement? Saskatoon police officers are saying that they are paying the price for a dysfunction administration of justice. The StarPhoenix is selling papers again, just like the editors did at the start of the satanic child abuse nightmare. Have a good look in the mirror, do you remember the devils church?
Before anyone judges the two police officers might it be best to hear them out. They have appealed their dismissals. It is my understanding that the hearings are independent from the Court of Queen’s Bench. They are entitled to due process just like anyone else in this country. Receiving due process in the Court of Queen’s Bench is next to impossible, not just for a police officer, but anyone. I do not understand why a report by any justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench would have any credibility with anyone. The international disgrace of this court is well known and documented. A march to the police station in support of the mayor and chief of police will not change anything. The rule of law has collapsed in Saskatoon. Officers of the Saskatoon Police Service are not responsible. If you are going to march, then march to the Court of Queen’s Bench and demand a public inquiry into the administration of justice.
Justice Wright recommended that the police hire more native officers. Any young native man or women that said that they were interested in joining the Saskatoon Police Service would have family and friends calling 911 and rushing them off to the nearest hospital. The same thing would happen to anyone that said they were going to open a foster home in Saskatchewan.
Next up, The Milgaard Inquiry. The commissioner is an Alberta judge. It is clear that a report by a Saskatchewan judge would have no credibility. David Milgaard was wrongly convicted 36 years ago and spent 23 years in jail. What about Travis Sterling and all the others wrongly convicted. This inquiry will not change anything in Saskatoon. Include the Milgaard Inquiry with a full public inquiry into the Saskatoon Court of Queen‘s Bench. Restore the credibility of this court and the rule of law. Until this is done the citizens of Saskatoon will continue to be subjected to Justice Hrabinsky’s and Madam Justice Dovell’s law.
In Saskatoon if you picket the court, report a lawyer to the police or say anything about a corrupt justice system you will be assaulted, jailed, hospitalised or put into a wheelchair. That’s Saskatchewan Justice.
Nothing is going to change in Saskatoon until the rot is removed from the Court of Queens Bench. Once the rot is removed from the court, lawyers will be able to remove the rot from their Law Society. The RCMP do not leave a officer in one community for any length of time. This prevents corruption from getting a foothold. Corruption in the legal community in Saskatoon has a solid foothold. Saskatoon police officers need a working environment where they can speak out about corruption within the police service without fear of reprisals. Lawyers in Saskatoon need to be able to speak out about corruption in the legal community without fear of reprisals from their law society or a justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench.
At the bottom of editorials in the StarPhoenix is a quote: “Democracy cannot be maintained without its foundation: Free public opinion and free discussion throughout the nation of all matters affecting the state within the limits set by the criminal code and the common law”. The Saskatoon StarPhoenix is a dismal failure, “all maters affecting the state” includes people unjustly charged and jailed by the state. It includes people who have had their lives destroyed by a dysfunction administration of justice. It includes homeowners blackmailed by lawyers using The Builders Lien Act. It includes a disabled man put into a wheelchair by the actions of the justices of the court of Queen’s Bench. You will not read about it in the StarPhoenix.
In the November 11, 2004 post by Sheila Steele she says: “It is not that we want credit or glory”. They deserve the respect of everyone that believes in a democratic state and free speech. If not for Sheila Steele and injusticebusters the atrocities of Saskatchewan justice would have been swept under the rug. The movie being made should not be a work of fiction. It is saddening to read on the web site about the differences developed over the years between people who once stood with a common goal. It shows the importance of stating the truth and putting ones signature on it.
James Hunter
Two officers paid the price and were jailed for a starlight ride that most, if not all police departments across Canada had been doing for years. I would think that the starlight rides have ended across Canada, lives have been saved as a result of a Saskatoon police officer taking a report that resulted in the two officers being charged. Do any of you know his name?
A police officer, therapist and prosecutor were found guilty of malicious prosecution. They are still receiving their pay cheques and the tax payers have again paid the price for the break down of the administration of justice. The StarPhoenix, in an article on the front page wanted to know what the settlement amount was in the Klassen case. I would like to know what it cost the tax payers for the court proceedings, the cover up, the jailing of innocent people, the medical costs to treat these people, their children and future medical costs.
The attorney general had no problem telling the people what the lawyer was paid in the Sterling settlement. Why is he not telling the tax payers what it cost them to starve these people into a settlement? Saskatoon police officers are saying that they are paying the price for a dysfunction administration of justice. The StarPhoenix is selling papers again, just like the editors did at the start of the satanic child abuse nightmare. Have a good look in the mirror, do you remember the devils church?
Before anyone judges the two police officers might it be best to hear them out. They have appealed their dismissals. It is my understanding that the hearings are independent from the Court of Queen’s Bench. They are entitled to due process just like anyone else in this country. Receiving due process in the Court of Queen’s Bench is next to impossible, not just for a police officer, but anyone. I do not understand why a report by any justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench would have any credibility with anyone. The international disgrace of this court is well known and documented. A march to the police station in support of the mayor and chief of police will not change anything. The rule of law has collapsed in Saskatoon. Officers of the Saskatoon Police Service are not responsible. If you are going to march, then march to the Court of Queen’s Bench and demand a public inquiry into the administration of justice.
Justice Wright recommended that the police hire more native officers. Any young native man or women that said that they were interested in joining the Saskatoon Police Service would have family and friends calling 911 and rushing them off to the nearest hospital. The same thing would happen to anyone that said they were going to open a foster home in Saskatchewan.
Next up, The Milgaard Inquiry. The commissioner is an Alberta judge. It is clear that a report by a Saskatchewan judge would have no credibility. David Milgaard was wrongly convicted 36 years ago and spent 23 years in jail. What about Travis Sterling and all the others wrongly convicted. This inquiry will not change anything in Saskatoon. Include the Milgaard Inquiry with a full public inquiry into the Saskatoon Court of Queen‘s Bench. Restore the credibility of this court and the rule of law. Until this is done the citizens of Saskatoon will continue to be subjected to Justice Hrabinsky’s and Madam Justice Dovell’s law.
In Saskatoon if you picket the court, report a lawyer to the police or say anything about a corrupt justice system you will be assaulted, jailed, hospitalised or put into a wheelchair. That’s Saskatchewan Justice.
Nothing is going to change in Saskatoon until the rot is removed from the Court of Queens Bench. Once the rot is removed from the court, lawyers will be able to remove the rot from their Law Society. The RCMP do not leave a officer in one community for any length of time. This prevents corruption from getting a foothold. Corruption in the legal community in Saskatoon has a solid foothold. Saskatoon police officers need a working environment where they can speak out about corruption within the police service without fear of reprisals. Lawyers in Saskatoon need to be able to speak out about corruption in the legal community without fear of reprisals from their law society or a justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench.
At the bottom of editorials in the StarPhoenix is a quote: “Democracy cannot be maintained without its foundation: Free public opinion and free discussion throughout the nation of all matters affecting the state within the limits set by the criminal code and the common law”. The Saskatoon StarPhoenix is a dismal failure, “all maters affecting the state” includes people unjustly charged and jailed by the state. It includes people who have had their lives destroyed by a dysfunction administration of justice. It includes homeowners blackmailed by lawyers using The Builders Lien Act. It includes a disabled man put into a wheelchair by the actions of the justices of the court of Queen’s Bench. You will not read about it in the StarPhoenix.
In the November 11, 2004 post by Sheila Steele she says: “It is not that we want credit or glory”. They deserve the respect of everyone that believes in a democratic state and free speech. If not for Sheila Steele and injusticebusters the atrocities of Saskatchewan justice would have been swept under the rug. The movie being made should not be a work of fiction. It is saddening to read on the web site about the differences developed over the years between people who once stood with a common goal. It shows the importance of stating the truth and putting ones signature on it.
James Hunter
Wednesday, October 20, 2004
What is this anger?
What is this anger? Justice Dovell turns it on and off like turning a light switch on and off. Audrey Brent is the same way and her law partner Lynne Greenhorn. My X wife is the same way and so is her mother and daughter. Is it inherited, it seems to runs in her family. I have been told that the anger is their way of keeping control.
In the late sixties I read a book by an Irish author and play right. He said in his book that men within the church in Ireland were gay and that this was known by the people and accepted. Gay men had found a safe haven within the churches in Ireland.
In Canada children were being raped in the churches across the country, wards of the court were warehoused on the third floor of the YMCA and selling themselves on the streets in Vancouver. It was and still is legal to rape a fourteen year old child in Canada. This seemed to be accepted by the people in Canada. It was not gay men that found a safe haven in the churches in Canada, it was pedophiles.
Family courts, social services and other agencies changed in Canada in the fifties and sixties. At that time men worked in family court registries, social services and other agencies. How many men work in family court registries and social services and other family based agencies now? There are no men in the family court registry in Saskatoon except for the registrar whose name appears on the form letters signed by a women. There are no male social workers in Saskatoon. There is only one male counsellor at family services in Saskatoon.
I look on the internet and the casualties of the family courts in Canada and around the world are waging a war. The courts have damaged and scared for life not just men, or women, but children, grandparents, brothers, sisters and other family members. I have looked a family law Acts and I have to ask, what is wrong with the laws that we have now? Why is Canada rewriting family laws? Is it because the law is not being applied equality? How is rewriting them going to help?
Most women know that there are women who have this anger about men. Men and women can not work with them. If they do they are in constant fear of being stabbed in the back. Excellent caring men and women have left the court registries, social services and other family based agencies. Those that have stayed live in fear of reprisals if they speak out about these angry women. Anyone that has lived with a Border Line Personality Disorder women will know what it is like. The anger is a means of control and they will go to any lengths to maintain that control.
I have many comments like this from women about Justice Dovell: “It's people like the female judge who make me very disappointed in our sex at times. Women are supposed to be smarter and more compassionate than this”.
I do not think it is just Border Line Personality Disorder. I think it is heterophobia. het·er·o·pho·bi·a -- n. The fear of straight people. Another definition is Heterophobia- Fear of the opposite sex. (Sexophobia). I believe that these sick women have found a safe haven in the family courts, social services and other family based services. Would it not be wise to get these angry sick women away from families and out of places where they can abuse their power and put disabled men into hospitals and wheelchairs? The biggest deception of all in Justice Dovell’s court is that it is said that the interests of the children comes first.
In the late sixties I read a book by an Irish author and play right. He said in his book that men within the church in Ireland were gay and that this was known by the people and accepted. Gay men had found a safe haven within the churches in Ireland.
In Canada children were being raped in the churches across the country, wards of the court were warehoused on the third floor of the YMCA and selling themselves on the streets in Vancouver. It was and still is legal to rape a fourteen year old child in Canada. This seemed to be accepted by the people in Canada. It was not gay men that found a safe haven in the churches in Canada, it was pedophiles.
Family courts, social services and other agencies changed in Canada in the fifties and sixties. At that time men worked in family court registries, social services and other agencies. How many men work in family court registries and social services and other family based agencies now? There are no men in the family court registry in Saskatoon except for the registrar whose name appears on the form letters signed by a women. There are no male social workers in Saskatoon. There is only one male counsellor at family services in Saskatoon.
I look on the internet and the casualties of the family courts in Canada and around the world are waging a war. The courts have damaged and scared for life not just men, or women, but children, grandparents, brothers, sisters and other family members. I have looked a family law Acts and I have to ask, what is wrong with the laws that we have now? Why is Canada rewriting family laws? Is it because the law is not being applied equality? How is rewriting them going to help?
Most women know that there are women who have this anger about men. Men and women can not work with them. If they do they are in constant fear of being stabbed in the back. Excellent caring men and women have left the court registries, social services and other family based agencies. Those that have stayed live in fear of reprisals if they speak out about these angry women. Anyone that has lived with a Border Line Personality Disorder women will know what it is like. The anger is a means of control and they will go to any lengths to maintain that control.
I have many comments like this from women about Justice Dovell: “It's people like the female judge who make me very disappointed in our sex at times. Women are supposed to be smarter and more compassionate than this”.
I do not think it is just Border Line Personality Disorder. I think it is heterophobia. het·er·o·pho·bi·a -- n. The fear of straight people. Another definition is Heterophobia- Fear of the opposite sex. (Sexophobia). I believe that these sick women have found a safe haven in the family courts, social services and other family based services. Would it not be wise to get these angry sick women away from families and out of places where they can abuse their power and put disabled men into hospitals and wheelchairs? The biggest deception of all in Justice Dovell’s court is that it is said that the interests of the children comes first.
Tuesday, October 19, 2004
The essential difference between rule of law and rule by law
“There is an essential difference between rule of law and rule by law. Countries with no real claim to democracy may have rule by law. One person - or a select group of people - may make the law according to their whim. They may do so arbitrarily, or without announcing the laws beforehand, meting out sanctions when people fail to obey. Rule of law is different. Rule of law means that all exercise of power - whether by the Prime Minister and executive, the elected members of Parliament, or by the most minor functionary - must be authorized by and fall within the bounds prescribed by the law.”
The Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin
The Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin
How extensive is the corruption within the Court of Queen’s Bench?
Justice Hrabinsky and Justice Dovell have used the law and The Court of Queen’s Bench to assault a disabled man and steal his assets. The independence of the judiciary means nothing to them. What is the going price for Justice Dovell to cook up a court order for Audrey Brent? Is it because they enjoy assaulting men or is it because they think they can get away with assaulting a disabled man? Is Justice Dovell being blackmailed by Audrey Brent? Do Justice Dovell and Audrey Brent have an agreement and if so what percentage of the blackmail money goes into Justice Dovell’s pocket? Is it just two angry man hating women getting their jollies? How many times have they done this? How many court orders has Justice Dovell cooked up in her time as a justice of the court? Is it just Justice Hrabinsky that helps her or do the other justices of the court engage in blackmail scams with Justice Dovell and Audrey Brent? Is it just her former law partners or can anyone have Justice Dovell cook up a court order for them? If Audrey Brent can have Justice Dovell cook up a court order has the attorney general or a police officer had her cook up a court order for them? How extensive is the corruption within the Court of Queen’s Bench? These questions and more need to be answered by a public inquiry. The damage done to people as a result of the actions of Justice Hrabinsky and Dovell is calculable, the damage to the court itself is incalculable.
Monday, October 18, 2004
This is not rule of law, it is rule by law.
I received the letter from the court dated February 24, 2004 after I collapsed in the court house. I was on the floor just by the court registry for twenty minutes. This resulted in a morphine injection at emergency. This is what can happen to men in family court who have a neurological movement disorder and are required to represent themselves. This was after a letter from my doctor was ignored by the court that said, “The court events before the treatments will seriously affect his health and must be delayed". The court proceedings were not delayed, again resulting in a morphine injection at emergency.
I received the letter dated May 10, 2004 from Audrey Brent. I did not attend at the trial three days later as I was told it had been adjourned.
I received the court order made by Justice Dovell on May 13, 2004. There was no application under Section 193 of the rules: “when a trial date has been assigned to any proceedings, it shall only be adjourned on the order of a judge upon application by a party and supported by affidavit. R. 193, Gaz. Jan. 18/91.
The order says "BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE M.L. DOVELL AT PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE"
"UPON this action coming before a Trial before Madam Justice M.L. Dovell"
The court order committed Justice Dovell as the trial judge under Queen’s Bench Act section 18 (b): all proceedings in an action or matter that are subsequent to a hearing or trial, down to and including the final judgement or order, shell be heard, determined and disposed of before the judge before whom the trial or hearing took place.
There was no pre-trial or trial, I was being set-up by Justice Dovell and Audrey Brent. This is not rule of law, it is rule by law. Audrey Brent’s and Justice Dovell’s law.
These two sick angry women have conspired to assault and blackmail a disabled man. It gives a new meaning to “working for women”. This is in retaliation for reporting two lawyers to the Saskatoon police for filling a false claim of lien under The Builders Lien Act. Audrey Brent and Justice Dovell were law partners for years in the late eighties. The lawyer I reported to the police joined the firm in 1990.
I helped a homeowner with a Motion to have a lien removed from his property. He detailed the scam in his affidavit. The chambers judge and lawyer verbally attacked the homeowner in chambers and he was rushed to the hospital in serious condition three hours later, he was in the hospital for three weeks.
Lawyers are using The Builders Lien Act to blackmail home owners in Saskatoon. They do it with the protection of the justices of the Court of Queen’s Bench. This is not just corruption, it is a perverted idea of justice.
James Hunter
I received the letter dated May 10, 2004 from Audrey Brent. I did not attend at the trial three days later as I was told it had been adjourned.
I received the court order made by Justice Dovell on May 13, 2004. There was no application under Section 193 of the rules: “when a trial date has been assigned to any proceedings, it shall only be adjourned on the order of a judge upon application by a party and supported by affidavit. R. 193, Gaz. Jan. 18/91.
The order says "BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE M.L. DOVELL AT PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE"
"UPON this action coming before a Trial before Madam Justice M.L. Dovell"
The court order committed Justice Dovell as the trial judge under Queen’s Bench Act section 18 (b): all proceedings in an action or matter that are subsequent to a hearing or trial, down to and including the final judgement or order, shell be heard, determined and disposed of before the judge before whom the trial or hearing took place.
There was no pre-trial or trial, I was being set-up by Justice Dovell and Audrey Brent. This is not rule of law, it is rule by law. Audrey Brent’s and Justice Dovell’s law.
These two sick angry women have conspired to assault and blackmail a disabled man. It gives a new meaning to “working for women”. This is in retaliation for reporting two lawyers to the Saskatoon police for filling a false claim of lien under The Builders Lien Act. Audrey Brent and Justice Dovell were law partners for years in the late eighties. The lawyer I reported to the police joined the firm in 1990.
I helped a homeowner with a Motion to have a lien removed from his property. He detailed the scam in his affidavit. The chambers judge and lawyer verbally attacked the homeowner in chambers and he was rushed to the hospital in serious condition three hours later, he was in the hospital for three weeks.
Lawyers are using The Builders Lien Act to blackmail home owners in Saskatoon. They do it with the protection of the justices of the Court of Queen’s Bench. This is not just corruption, it is a perverted idea of justice.
James Hunter
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)