The Fix is in

"There are no jokes. The truth is the funniest joke of all."
Muhammad Ali

I realise now that once Justice G A Smith, Justice Hrabinsky, Justice Dovell, Brent Gough and Audrey Brent high-jacked the court procedure there was no way that I would be treated fairly in the Court of Queen’s Bench. The fix is in judges. Even accused criminals have the right to due process of law. It is not just politicians that can “fix” the outcome of trials and appeals in Saskatchewan. It is done in criminal cases and civil cases.

Saskatchewan Justice conducts secret courts where the public and the media are not allowed in the court. The evidence known to the public before a publication ban and gag order may not be enough to conclude that someone is guilty. When the court issues a gag order and the evidence is secret it is clear that it is the secrecy that is the determining factor in issuing the gag order.

When I reported Nicolas Stooshinoff and the manager of Windsor Plywood, David Hilash to the Saskatoon Police I should have realised when Justice G A Smith protected a corrupt lawyer and when the police officer sent the file with a recommendation to lay charges to the prosecutors office instead of laying charges that the system was corrupt.

The first lawyer I had, James Rugg, had no choice but to go along with railroading me to a pre-trial hearing. He was not the first lawyer fearful of reprisals. Ben Mah had no choice but to refer Stooshinoff’s and Hilash’s scam victim to Brent Gough. I believe this had a lot to do with the judgement of Justice Wimmer when he refused to dismiss the motion filed by Stooshinoff’s victim in chambers. Justice Wimmer was the last judge not involved in the cover-up protecting Stooshinoff that would see any of the evidence.

Once justice G A Smith, Dovell, Hrabinsky, Brent Gough and the prosecutors office high-jacked the proceeding there was no chance of another judge seeing or hearing anything to do with the cases. The fix was in.

The well organized operation to protect Mr Stooshinoff was not put in place to protect a corrupt lawyer over $9000.00 worth of building supplies. When I search the internet and found the Ross, Ross and White preliminary inquiry, trial and appeal and the Klassen preliminary and the Peter Klassen, and Lucas cases the fix in the Stooshinoff case was minor. A lot of the information concerning the cases and how and who was involved in the fix did not fit into place until after the Baynton Judgement. It had been a long time coming, the Baynton Judgement restored some of the publics trust in the court and I think it was a good thing after reading the judgement that Justice Baynton was limited to the issues before the court. I would question why a judge would blame two 8 year old girls for what clearly started and continued as a result of the court and government covering up the Ross, Ross and White preliminary inquiry and trial.

The lack of evidence, tapes, documents and reasons for judgement by Justice Batten in the R. R. & White case were being fixed around the appeal court judgement to protect the court and Saskatchewan Justice and social services. The lower court and politicians were being protected by the appeal court judgement.

There have been hysterias in the past but nothing on the scale of what happened in one small area of Saskatchewan with the satanic child abuse cases. The story of Richard Klassen’s fight for justice is nothing in comparison to the lives that were destroyed by the administration of justice, judges and the government of Saskatchewan. Once the cover-up started there was no stopping it. It continues to this day. The story would make a good Monty Python movie if were not for there being real people involved.

I had a good look at the R v Lucas case and I had a lot of questions about like why would a justice of the court of appeal tell his lawyer at the start of the appeal proceedings to “sit down, shut up and do not say another word“. There was very little or nothing as far as a reason for judgement. Nothing about justice Wright’s judgement on July 6, 1995 (R. V. KLASSEN). Justice Vancise said: “While it is not necessary for the resolution of this matter to comment” and then he went into a detailed written discussion about a matter that had nothing to do with the case before the court. When one reads all of material and judgements involving the Ross children and the Lucas case before the Baynton Judgement there is so much information and smoke that it is difficult to understand the who, what and why of the previous cases. After the Baynton Judgement those engaged in the cover-up and the who, what and why of defending the administration of justice is so transparent that it takes only a puff or two to blow the smoke away.

The lawyer who represented at the same time the Ross children and the police officer named in their Statement of Claim as a Defendant by the very fact of his doing this implies that he and the defendant police officer believed that the court was so corrupted that it would allow them to get away with it.

Based on the Baynton judgement and what the court, prosecutors and police were allowed to get away with as a result of the court cover-up its clear why they expect Saskatchewan Justice to take care of them by appealing the Baynton Judgement.

It's in the court’s best interest to make sure no one is left wondering if the fix is in.
One does not have to wonder any longer. Canadians expect that the court will be above suspicions that the fix is in and that decisions are being based on something other then lie and deceive. This can not be achieved when justice Hrabinsky’s conduct is at the core of what must be judged. The evidence and facts in the Lucas trial was being fixed around the need to protect Saskatchewan justice, social services and the self interests of the legal community by justice Hrabinsky and the prosecutor.

John Lucas was charged just before the Baynton judgement. Seven of the eight charges were tossed, withdrawn, or stayed as a result of justice Baynton blowing the smoke away. The only remaining charge is defaming justice Hrabinsky. I find it unbelievable that the judges of the court of Queen’s Bench would do nothing about politicians and the chief justice and a hand full of judges destroying not only the lives of children and innocent people but the careers of police officers, prosecutors, doctors, social workers and the many others slandered in the Baynton Judgement as a result of the actions of a few politicians and judges like Hrabinsky, G A Smith, Dovell and Kyle and all because Saskatchewan Justice fixed the Ross, Ross and White appeal. There is something dead, smelling and walking in the Court of Queen‘s Bench.

If John Lucas is found guilty, again, then clearly a guilty verdict isn’t what it used to be before gag orders and secret courts. He is waiting for his fixed obligatory show trial to protect Justice Hrabinsky and Saskatchewan Justice. The blatant injustice of John Lucas’s situation is disturbing because we never know who may fall victim to it next because of gag orders like Justice Kyle’s.

The Baynton judgement must have been a eye opener for John Lucas. With the resent disclosure and the Baynton judgement his past proceeding would be a lot clearer. It explains the hug and mug judgements of justice Dovell in regards to Richard Klassen and why Justice Vancise went on about the secret R. R. & White evidence and his lawyer being told to sit down and shut up.

Where is the justice?