Hathway: Corruption and Malice

Reading the injusticebusters web site today has me remembering Saskatoon back in the 90’s. A women named Johanna Lucas picketed the Saskatoon Police Station after receiving no help for three children who were wards of the court. Two 8 year old girls were being raped by their older brother and no one in Saskatoon would help her or the children.

Johanna Lucas was arrested, gagged by court order and jailed. Her husband John, was arrested the following day, gagged by court order and jailed. They claimed a Saskatoon Police Officer knowingly left the girls to be raped. This happened during the Saskatchewan Justice cover-up of the satanic child abuse hysteria court cases in Saskatoon and surrounding area.

Some families are on welfare all their lives, their children, and their children are on welfare, it has become a family tradition and way of life in Canada.

The administration of justice in Saskatchewan is similar, family connections can be traced back for years along with the political connections. Political patronage appointments to the courts and family members appointed to high places within the government of Saskatchewan can be traced back for years. The public has been very outspoken about this practice in the past.

This has resulted in problems appointing friends and family members so the party members mutually agree not to oppose each others patronage appointments. They will be quick to point out in rare occasions when someone from a different party is appointed and this is nothing more then, you scratch my back, and I will scratch yours.

The administration of justice in Saskatchewan is corrupt, not in the sense as organized corruption to defraud money from the public, it was more of a corruption that protects incompetent and corrupt officers of the court. This has resulted in people who have been responsible for corruption and one judicial travesty after travesty in Saskatchewan being promoted and advancing into higher positions.

An example is reporting a former president of the progressive conservative party Nicholas Stooshinoff, to the Saskatoon Police for blackmailing a Saskatoon homeowner. If you do something like that in Saskatoon you will have Justice J A Smith, Audrey Brent, Justice Hrabinsky and Justice Dovell beat the homeowner and you into the ground and steal your money and your home. You will hire lawyers in an attempt to protect yourself and the bunch of them will steal your money and the money and assets of an 88 year old family member.

The above enlisted the help of Brent Gough, Don Morgan, Shelley Sutherland and Terrance S. Chinn for help to protect a corrupt administration of justice by creating diversions, lying, perjuring themselves and falsifying court documents. One would think that after all the millions paid out in damages Saskatchewan Justice and the City of Saskatoon would start cleaning out the rot.

The greatest protector of corruption in Saskatchewan is Justice Hrabinsky. Johanna and John Lucas were jailed in what has to be one of the most outrages sick court travesties ever in Canada. Jail Johanna and John Lucas and leave two 8 year old girls to be raped for four years.

When Justice Hrabinsky was unable to silence by jailing and gagging the media Justice Dovell and G A Smith were appointed to the Court of Queens Bench. Hrabinsky needed help covering up the atrocities, the rape of 8 year old girls and protect the people responsible for jailing and maliciously prosecuting innocent people. Its been called strange justice, leaving children to be raped is sick justice.

The injusticebusters web site exposed the corruption in Saskatoon by defying court gag orders and publishing the story of the malicious prosecutions of innocent people charged by a police officer who left children to be raped.

The injusticebusters web site has again published allegations about a Saskatoon Police Officer. It is being claimed that this police officer tampered with evidence and gave perjured testimony during Hathway's preliminary inquiry. The information has been on the web site for weeks. In the past Saskatchewan Justice has ignored the truth. The rape of 8 year old girls was ignored. This is done because getting a court order to have it removed from the site would draw the attention of the media from outside of Saskatchewan. Like we seen with the Scandal of the Century broadcast by the Fifth Estate in the Richard Klassen travesty of justice, the outside media publishes before the Saskatoon StarPhoenix will publish the story.

A man recently stood in a Saskatchewan court room and told the judge that the court was corrupt and the judge and prosecutor were silent. Not one word, dead silence. Try doing that standing in a court room before one of the many outstanding honest judges in the Court of Queens Bench and see what happens. You had better be able to prove it, or bring your tooth brush. It would be a light sentence in Saskatoon, one known corrupt judge in the court would tarnish the rest of them and draw the attention of the media to them all if your ears were ordered removed. Star Chamber.

Justice Hrabinsky and Dovell are corrupt judges.

There are also allegations about a Saskatoon prosecutor just published on injusticebusters. It is claimed that Mr Hathway “provided Queen's Bench Judge Allisen Rothery with enough evidence not only to have Brent Klause removed from his file but to have him exchange places with Hathway --”. “Hathway spoke for almost an hour, pointing the judge to the precise pages in the Crown's disclosure files which show that Klause deliberately and maliciously interfered with his right to a fair trial.” Also published was a, “allegation that the Saskatoon Police Service has acted improperly and that evidence which the Saskatoon Police should have investigated was instead given to the Crown.”

Saskatchewan Justice will first stay silent, then order a media ban, claim the people who are making the allegations are nuts, leave it to the StarPhoenix and preliminary proceedings to create the public image of guilt and require innocent people to drag Saskatchewan Justice kicking and screaming to the truth for over 10 years.

Queen's Bench Judge Allisen Rothery has this information and can not ignore it. There has been no attempt to have the information removed from injusticebusters. I find this to be a great concern. Saskatchewan Justice has no credibility. Thanks to injusticebusters a Saskatoon prosecutor and police officer were found guilty of malice. They were both allowed to continue on as if nothing happened.

If Saskatchewan Justice refuses to deal with this atrocity then the evidence must be published before we have yet another case of perverted justice in Saskatchewan. End the secrecy in Saskatchewan courts by standing in solidarity with Mr Hathway demanding justice, the truth and a fair trial.

Their can be no justice in Saskatchewan without justice for Johanna Lucas and the Ross Children. Clean the stink and the rot out of Saskatchewan Justice.

Mr Hathway needs a lawyer from outside of Saskatchewan? He needs a court and a trial judge from outside of Saskatchewan.

Sexual Assault Awareness Month

Saskatchewan's Shame
Let the World Know What Happened to The Eight Year Old Ross Twins In Saskatchewan.

Hathway: Saskatoon’s ongoing legal folly’s.

Mr Hathway was back in a Saskatoon court room on Friday.

He has been incarcerated for two years in the Saskatoon correction Centre. After two years and three lawyers one could assume from the media reports that this man has a screw loose. The ban imposed by the court has left the media reporting on a slanted view of the proceedings that has the effect of portraying Mr Hathway, over and over, as the killer of his 84 year old landlord. Mr Hathway is innocent until proven guilty in a competent court of law. Elements that are sadly lacking in Saskatoon. Innocent until proven guilty, a competent court and third, competent legal representation.

Mr Hathway is presumed to be guilty, the court is corrupt, the administration of justice is corrupt, he will not find a lawyer in Saskatchewan willing to risk his career by representing him and no one in Saskatoon could give a damn.

The law requires a full disclosure by the Crown. One would think after two years of yelling for justice that Mr Hathway would have full disclosure. When Mr Hathway files a motion requesting a full disclosure the Crown pushes his buttons by allowing the Saskatchewan Law Society and Chief Justice Robert Laing to high jack his last motion.

The Chief Justice had some difficulty with Mr Hathway’s last motion. He was unable to control his dislike for members of Mr Hathway’s defence team. They are not lawyers, but, and a big but, they know and have experience dealing with Saskatoon’s culture of injustice. There is no reverse onus requiring Mr Hathway to file motion, after motion, requesting the Crown provide a full disclosure.

This is a fact in Saskatchewan, it is supported by injustice after injustice. As long as Mr Hathway has a Saskatchewan lawyer he will not receive a full disclosure from the Crown. If this is another Saskatchewan Justice malicious prosecution he will only get a corrupt Saskatchewan lawyer approved by the law society to represent him.

The University of Saskatchewan College of Law has a serious ethics problem. This is nothing new, it has been known for years.

Integrated Plan 2003-2007 College of Law
University of Saskatchewan

“What we do not currently have is an introduction to the legal profession and limited exploration of professional ethics, except to a very limited extent in some first year courses.”

It is a lack of accountability, not professional ethics that is the cause of the judicial and legal corruption in Saskatoon. The College of Law is a recognized accredited institution of learning that has failed to maintain standards requisite for its graduates to achieve credentials for professional practice. Why the College of Law recognizes that it has a serious ethics problem is clear, graduates lacking in ethics have been appointed to the bench for years in Saskatchewan. It is the judgements and lack of judicial ethics of a hand full of judges and corrupt lawyers that is jeopardizing the credentials and ethics of the future graduates of the Saskatoon College of Law. The College has a fundamental duty to impart these values and ethics through the teaching of law to maintain its standing as a reputable accredited institution. Accredited, by who, the graduates?

I see Mr Hathway's hand full of motions as a desperate attempt by a man who knows he is dealing with a corrupt administration of justice. I am tired of reading about all the nutty things attributed to Mr Hathway over, and over, and over. Enough already.

He is asking for a full disclosure, write about all the other wrongful convictions and malicious prosecutions in Saskatoon and Saskatchewan attributed to withholding evidence and documents by the Crown. We read about the injustice of the Martinsville and Klassen cases in the StarPhoenix as if they were the only cases where innocent people were persecuted by Saskatchewan Justice, charged and jailed in Saskatoon’s media fuelled witch hunt hysteria.

Why is it that the people of Saskatoon never read about Ross, Ross and White, Johanna Lucas, John Lucas, two 8 year old twin girls left to be raped for four years, the judges and officers of the court who allowed this travesty of justice and the judges who abused their power to cover-up this atrocity. A lawyer who dared to question the jailing of Johanna Lucas was told to “shut up, sit down & don’t say another word". Do the people not have a right to know what Justice of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal is responsible for this display of judicial arrogance and stupidly. Would someone please ask the Globe and Mail to send a reporter to Saskatoon and report on the Hathway case?

Here is a fact that is becoming clearer in a Saskatoon court room. It is becoming harder and harder for known corrupt judges in Saskatoon to get away with their corrupt court proceedings. This was very clear when Justice Malone was asked by the Crown to remove himself as the trial judge in the John Lucas case. I see no difference in Mr Hathway asking that a prosecutor be replaced, the secret court does not allow the public to know the details of the accusations by Mr Hathway because of the publication ban but the history of the court and the Saskatoon prosecutors office in Saskatoon is well known and speaks for itself.

The Crown has objected to the motions and requested that the motions be heard by a trial judge. Why, is justice Rothery not capable of hearing Mr Hathway’s motions and making a sound judgement. Who would pick the trial judge, the Chief Justice? Who picked him? The former Chief Justice picked Justice Malone to hear the Lucas case and then they tried to fix the outcome of his jury trial. Only in Saskatchewan. Could this happen to Mr Hathway? It is happening to Mr Hathway. He is in a corrupt court.

How about appointing justice Hrabinsky or Dovell, or one of the other judicial corrupt misfits lacking in ethics and brains who graduated from the Saskatoon College of Law.

We need a newspaper in Saskatoon.

News at saskatchewanjustice.ca
The Offbeat
BACK TO HATHWAY

Hathway: The games people will play.

The duties of a prosecutor changed in Canada after the Charter.

“The role of the prosecutor excludes any notion of winning or losing; his function is a matter of public duty than which in civil life there can be none charged with a greater personal responsibility.” “Great care must be taken to ensure that the independent role of the prosecutor is preserved when working in a police environment.” Justice Canada

http://www.justice.gc.ca/en/dept/pub/jc/vol1/no2/index.html

A prosecutor who continues with charges that he knows to be untrue is guilty of a criminal offence. A judge that knowingly allows a prosecutor to continue in his/her court with charges that are known to be false is guilty of a criminal offence.

The Court of Queen’s Bench must stop the game playing with Mr. Klause's and Mr Hathway’s life. Appoint a lawyer to represent Mr Hathway, now!

News at saskatchewanjustice.ca
Who Represents Mr. Bruce Crawford?
http://www.saskatchewanjustice.ca/html/news.html

Je Me Souviens

You two don’t look guilty. You look pissed off.

A powerful statement that adds a personal touch to over twelve years of persecution by Saskatchewan Justice. Jail the innocent and leave two 8 year old girls to be raped.

Je Me Souviens Saskatchewanjustice.ca

Incarcerate and Destroy, welcome to Saskatchewan.

"The whole judicial system is at issue"

The Ross Children were apprehended in February, of 1987 and placed into the care and control of the people of Saskatchewan by way of Social Services and Saskatchewan Justice. Twin girls aged 5 and their brother aged 8. Seriously dysfunctional children in need of medical help for the documented symptoms of FASD.

Saskatchewan Social Services advertised for a “special” foster home for the boy. He was separated from his sisters and moved into the Thompson foster home run by two seriously dysfunctional religious lunatics. The sexual abuse of his sisters ended and the shameful sick abuse of the Ross Children by the people of Saskatchewan started.

The people of Saskatchewan placed the children into the care and control of seriously dysfunction employees of Saskatchewan Justice and Social Services. The abnormal sexual behaviour of the children was considered to be the result of their being sexually abused by members of a Satanic Cult consisting of their parents, foster parents and most of the people known to the children up until that time.

The twins were placed into the Thompson foster home with their brother. The twins brother was allowed to rape, sodomize, and torture his sisters for 43 months between May 29th, 1990 and January 1994.

The children’s parents and a friend were the first to be subjected to the perverted justice at a preliminary inquiry in Saskatchewan. This is when the cover-up by Saskatchewan justice started. This is when the cover-up by the director of public prosecutions started. This is when the cover-up by Saskatchewan Social Services started. This is when the cover-up by the City of Saskatoon and Saskatoon Police Service started.

The separate cover-ups was there down fall. Had there been trust, ethics and honour there would not have been a judgement by Justice Baynton over ten years later that protected the guilty by sacrificing the Ross Children, a police officer, Crown prosecutor and a child therapist.

Had there been trust, ethics and honour the 8 year old Ross twins would not have been left to be raped for four years in Saskatchewan. Saskatchewan’s Shame.

There is not a lawyer or judge in Canada that did not understand the meaning of the statement by Serge Kujawa, the Crown prosecutor in the David Milgaard case.

“The whole judicial system is at issue -- it's worth more than one person . . . .”

Justice for the Ross Children, Johanna and John Lucas. “The whole judicial system is at issue”. It is worth more then a hand full of Saskatchewan Judicial Rot

To the editors: The Sheaf

Cambridge International Dictionary of English

cartoon (DRAWING) noun [C]

1 a drawing, especially in a newspaper or magazine, that tells a joke or makes an amusing political criticism.

Conservative priorities: Court appointments

Harper to Politicize Supreme Court Appointments. - Liberal.ca - Liberal Party of Canada

“Harper to Politicize Supreme Court Appointments”.

Rubbish, the courts are a political arm of government, provincial and federal. A political arm of Revenue Canada. Family courts are a political arm of Social Services. Appellant courts are a political arm of government corruption.. Look at the junk judgements in Saskatchewan.

“Minister of Justice Toews has repeatedly shown a lack of respect for Canada’s highest judicial body when the court’s decisions do not coincide with his own views.”

"We have seen these radical liberal judges who have their own social agenda coming to the bench and forgetting that their responsibility is to interpret the law and not to make law. And so we are very, very concerned about that." Vic Toews

Its about time, a politician who is willing to tell Canadians what they already know. Appointments to the bench in Canada is a political process that is flawed and corrupt. It is a corrupted administration of justice and its political appointed members who are claiming that the process of appointing judges in Canada is not a political process. I do not know one Canadian that believes that appointment to the bench in Canada are not political patronage.

Political patronage appointments have changed over the years, everyone wants to be a judge. It is the only way left for government to avoid the criticism of Canadians. The result, corrupt judges and a decline over the years of the quality of Canadian judges.

What upstanding man or women with values would run for elected office in Canada, federal or provincial. In 1988, Jack Wolfe, a man with outstanding character and values was elected to the Saskatchewan legislature, he was a country veterinarian and a political idealist.

In 1995 he left a note for his wife.

"I love you all too much to have you bear the pain of having my name and reputation destroyed because of the partisan political interests of others."

He then shot himself.

CBC link: From politics to prison in Saskatchewan

He was a honest, outstanding family man, who was not involved with the corruption that characterized the progressive conservative party of Grant Devine. The party was defeated in Saskatchewan, the political trash appointed to the Saskatchewan courts and the political patronage appointments of the Devine government have contributed over the years to Saskatchewan’s deserving reputation of corruption.

We have been witness to a historic event in Canada. Elected Members of Parliament have questioned a nominee for the Supreme Court of Canada. Smoke and mirrors, but a start.

The Harper government needs to quickly, before the next election end the political motivated federal appointments to the courts in Canada. We can not have a process like in the USA. We can not get honourable men and women to run for elected office in Canada now. We will not get honourable men and women within the legal community to subject themselves to questioning by a bunch of self-serving politicians who know nothing about the law, the importance of an independent judiciary or the separation of church and state.

Why not let all the members of the Bar across Canada, except judges and law society benchers vote for the best of the top five on the Prime Ministers short list. Provincial appointments could be voted on by all provincial members of the Bar independently of the provincial law societies. Keep the law societies and the judges out of the process until the rot is removed. If a member of the Bar refused to vote, take his/her licence away, Canadians screwed by lawyers would enjoy that.

Do the same for the members of the Canadian Judicial Council. Get the spin doctors out of the process.

Conservative priorities: Children

A key Conservative priority is to raise the age of protection from 14 to 16, with a "close in age" exemption, said Toews, adding: "We don't want to criminalize conduct between youths." Its about time. The change would mean criminal charges for adults who have sex with girls or boys under the age of 16.

How about doing something to help the thousands of children in Canada who have dead brain cells as a result of years of racism that left them with no hope and inhaling chemicals out of a plastic bag. These children are prostituting themselves on streets across Canada. Get the pedophiles off the streets, what about the children?

Lucas & Hathway: Lawyers Needed in Saskatchewan.

Mr Hathway has been incarcerated for over two years at the Saskatoon Correction Centre. He was charged in the 1998 stabbing death of his landlord.

Mr Hathway was subjected to the RCMP Mr Big Sting. This sting is used to obtain a confession when there is no credible evidence of guilt. It is used to obtain a confession after a profile discloses a weakness in character, alcohol, past criminal convictions, drug abuse or the violability of youth.

In Mr Hathway’s case it was his past alcohol abuse. Get him off the wagon, out of school, get him drunk, engage him in illegal activities, lead him down the gardener path with no way out but a confession.

The evidence at the preliminary hearing was banned from publication, this is normal, what is not normal is the extent of the publication ban that relies on new terrorism legislation enacted after 9/11.

The preliminary hearing was turned into a court procedure resembling Abbott and Costello famous "Who's on first" radio skit.

Mr Hathway is not a threat to Canada’s national security. Withholding full disclosure by the Crown to Mr Hathway can not be justified as being a threat to Canada’s national security.

Mr Hathway’s Motion for a full disclosure was high jacked by Mr. Justice Laing, the Saskatchewan Law Society and the federal justice department.

It was a failed attempt to further add to the growing number of laws written by judges in Canada. Judges writing laws in secret courts needs to end in Canada. Elected members of government write laws, after an open debate in public and the press. If the politicians get it wrong in Canada’s vote splitting minority rules form of government then it is freedom of speech, and the press, that protect the Constitution and Mr Hathway’s right to a fair, and just trial.

From the news media:

“charged in the 1998 stabbing death of his 84-year-old landlord”

I don’t like people who would do that to a 84 year old.

“He shouted at Klause on occasion and once stood up in the prisoner's box prepared to fight. He also called a police witness a liar.”

I don’t like people who have no respect for the court and police officers.

“Klause has suggested information may have been misplaced by Hathway's two previous lawyers (both of whom were fired by Hathway).”

This guy must be unstable, firing two “real lawyers”.

“His previous lawyer, Robert Borden, withdrew from the case in mid-January.”

Must be guilty, his lawyer quit on him.

Do not prejudge Mr Hathway.

The Crown was ordered to provide Mr Hathway with disclosure material in the Saskatoon Correction Centre. Mr Hathway is not represented by a lawyer. The CTV’s W-Five has been refused entry into the Correction Centre to interview Mr Hathway. The news media is not going to take directions from non-lawyers, a lawyer will not take directions from a non-lawyer.

Mr Hathway would have been just another victim of the administration of justice in Saskatchewan had he not received the help of non-lawyers with a working understanding of the history of corruption within Saskatchewan Justice and the Saskatoon Police Service. This is the only reason for the news coverage at his otherwise secret preliminary hearing.

Mr Hathway will not receive a fair trial in a corrupt Saskatchewan court.

The Crown requested that John Lucas, who is charged with defaming Justice Paul Hrabinsky make application to the court for the removal of Justice Malone as the trial judge at his upcoming October, 2006 jury trial. Mr Lucas told the Crown prosecutor to do his own dirty work and upon hearing the request of the Crown a justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench stopped the court proceedings.

A request was made by the judge/judges to both Saskatchewan Chief Justices to have a Court of Appeal Judge hear the lower court jury trial. It was clear that a justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench was concerned that Mr Lucas would not receive a fair trial in Court of Queen’s Bench under the control of corrupt judges.

The request was denied, justice Malone removed himself as the trial judge and the same judges that appointed Justice Malone appointed Queen’s Bench Justice Ball as the new trial judge. This is a good example of how Saskatchewan Justice suckers an honest judge into protecting a corrupt court and corrupt judges.

There is no question that Mr Lucas is being maliciously prosecuted by corrupt judges in corrupted court proceedings.

Mr Hathway is in the same court and he is claiming that he is being maliciously prosecuted.

Mr Lucas has a gag order that prevents him from talking about his case. Mr Hathway is locked up with his disclosure documents. They both need legal representation that is not available in Saskatchewan. There is not a hope in hell of them having a Saskatchewan lawyer represent them.

It is time that the Parliament of Canada and elected representatives started protecting the Charter Rights of Canadians. The federal justice department must protect Canadians when the provincial government of Saskatchewan refuses to act when there is a clear history of judicial corruption within the courts and Saskatchewan Justice.

Order a judicial stay of proceedings in the Lucas case or appoint a lawyer of his choice from outside Saskatchewan. Take the self-serving gag order, wipe and flush it along with the stink from Saskatchewan Justice.

Let Mr Hathway out on bail. He has Charter Rights, locking him up in remand for over two years is cruel and unusual punishment.

Keeping Mr Hathway locked up in a cell with boxes full of disclosure that he is responsible for without his having legal representation is an invitation to a disaster. Get the disclosure properly organised on CD’s. a computer in his cell or give him access to one of the jail computers without any keyboard jackoff mess.

The Government of Canada can not continue to ignore the corruption in Saskatchewan. A full public inquiry into the administration of justice would have helped over ten years ago. It would have saved the tax payers of Saskatchewan the millions that have been paid out in damages and on corrupt court proceeding.

Clean out the judicial rot from Saskatchewan Justice before the next appointment to the Supreme Court of Canada.