There will be no Nativity Scene in Ottawa this year!

The Supreme Court has ruled that there cannot be a Nativity Scene in Canada's, capital this Christmas season.

This isn't for any religious reason, they simply have not been able to find Three Wise Men in the Nation's capitol, nor could they find a virgin.

There was no problem, however, finding enough asses to fill the stable.

Matthew Miazga v. Estate of Dennis Kvello

Supreme Court of Canada
Hearing Date: December 12, 2008

Hathway sentenced in killing of landlord

Hathway sentenced in killing of landlord
Lengthy remand time shortens stint behind bars
By Lori Coolican

November 29, 2008

Wilfred Hathway gets 11-and-a-half year prison sentence

Wilfred Hathway gets 11-and-a-half year prison sentence
Was charged in 2004 in the stabbing death of 84-year-old landlord Denver Crawford
TheStarPhoenix.com
Published: Friday, November 28, 2008

Richard Klassen and Angela Geworsky appeared in Regina Provincial Court

Law Society of Sask. takes two to court
Heather Polischuk, Leader-Post
Published: Monday, November 24, 2008

Hathway to be sentenced November 28

Hathway on "a bender" the night of killing
Betty Ann Adam, The StarPhoenix.com
Published: Thursday, November 13, 2008

Wilfred Gordon Hathway pleads guilty to manslaughter

TheStarPhoenix.com
Published: Monday, November 03, 2008

CBC News and comments

Scrappy accused's guilty plea a stunning twist
Les MacPherson, The StarPhoenix
Published: Thursday, November 06, 2008

The Inquiry.ca

Detailed information about the Cornwall Public Inquiry into allegations of sexual abuse

http://www.theinquiry.ca/

News July 5, 2008: Morgentaler Lucien Larre

My congratulations to Dr Morgentaler. A member of the Order of Canada can be removed if they have been subjected to an official sanction by an adjudicating body, professional association, or other organization. Official sanctions can include fines, reprimands, or disbarment.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/sc/07/04/2007bcsc0416.htm
Dr. Lucien Larre v. College of Psychologists of British Columbia

“Counsel for the College noted that the powers of section 35(1) must be used sparingly and rarely exercised where the result would be to effectively deprive a person of the ability to carry on his or her profession, but that it is a power that should be used when it is demonstrably necessary to provide maximum protection to the public. He argued that there was sufficient material before the panel establishing a strong prima facie case and that also established that there is a real and serious threat to the safety of clients entrusted to the respondent's care if he continues to practice.”

Dr. Larre’s clients are children. He has returned his order of Canada before it is taken from him. The Governor General of Canada should not accept it, take it from him.

My concern is for the children of Coquitlam BC and that the Archdiocese of Vancouver will move this disgraced priest to another unsuspecting community in Canada, or back to Saskatchewan.

News: July 4, 2008. Colleen Leduc

Colleen Leduc can be thankful she does not live in Saskatchewan

Hathway Trial

Wilfred Hathway

Jury selection postponed in Hathway murder trial until first week of November, 2008.

Wilfred Hathway:

A new trial date is to be set Friday

Justice Lang knows there is no accountability.

Who picked Robert Lang, Chief Justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench as the chambers judge in Holgate v. Kari Klassen. Was it Don McKillop, Crown Counsel Civil Law Division, Saskatchewan Justice?

The word is that the Holgate v Kari Klassen matter has been adjourned at the request of Kari Klassen and consented to by Holgate. I did not read anything in Kari Klassen’s letter asking for a adjournment. The motion has not been adjourned, it will have to be reheard by a different judge. Who is going to pick the new judge, Robert Lang?

Kari Klassen clearly asked Robert Lang to step down, after he heard the motion and reserved judgement. Robert Lang has a obligation, a duty to withdrawn from hearing the matter when he has a conflict of interest. Justice Lang did not do this.

Kari Klassen did not just accuse Robert Lang of being biased. She detailed an example of his bias in her letter. It was not the rule of law on Robert Lang’s mind. He was so involved in conducting his corrupt court proceedings that he was unable to see who was in his court. It was not Angie Geworsky, it was Kari Klassen.

Justice Lang is not very good at conducting corrupt court proceedings. It is understandable why he would want to hear the Holgate v Kari Klassen matter after Wilfred Hathway, with help from Richard Klassen and Angie Geworsky made him and Robert Kennedy look like the fools they are at the Hathway hearing.

Robert Lang knows the lawyers will stay silent. The last time that Edward Holgate tried to say that the court was a travesty of justice he was told by a court of appeal judge, “sit down, shut-up, and do not say another word”. This happened during the Johanna Lucas appeal of the judgement of the undisputed master of corrupt court proceeding, common thief and blackmailer, Justice Paul Hrabinsky.

A further complaint to the Canadian Judicial Council would be a waste of time and money. Justice Lang knows there is no accountability.

Wilfred Hathway: Jury selection postponed

Jury selection postponed in Hathway murder trial
Chris Purdy, TheStarPhoenix.com
Published: Monday, March 31, 2008
SASKATOON - The first-degree murder trial of Wilfrid Hathway has been postponed to next Monday. Court of Queen's Bench Justice Gerald Albright sent potential jurors who had arrived for jury selection Monday morning home and told them to return again next week. Hathway, 48, is accused in the 1998 stabbing death of his 84-year-old rooming house landlord, Denver Crawford, in Saskatoon. Hathway was arrested by Kamloops RCMP in 2004.

chpurdy@sp.canwest.com

Hathway’s lawyer is sick. On Friday March 28, 2008 at 2 PM there was a meeting in chambers. The trial was to start on March 3, 2008. Jury selection has been postponed until Monday April 7, 2008. I will post the new trial date after it is announced.

Kari Klassen’s letter requesting Justice Lang step down.

Click image to enlarge

Chief Justice Lang should resign, now.

Why is everyone so silent about Justice Robert Lang taking charge of the Holgate v. Klassen hearing? Mr Lang can not deny that he had a serious conflict of interest. Everyone knows that. Kari Klassen’s husband reported justice Lang to the Canadian Judicial Council. It looks like he intended to get even with her husband Richard Klassen and Angie Geworsky. Before being appointed to the bench, Robert Lang, represented Edward Holgate, at the request of the Law Society after one of Mr Holgate’s former clients sued him. Is he still representing Mr Holgate?

More news at starchamberproceedings.ca: Chief Justice Lang should resign, now.

Robert Lang: Holgate v. Kari Klassen

Holgate v. Kari Klassen
News at starchamberproceedings.ca: Robert Lang, Chief Justice of the Court of Queens Bench is dragging his court through the mud again.

Dystonia: More RCMP Taser Abuse in Canada

Just like many other people in Canada who have been witness to police brutality, Mr Dempsey, was arrested after he intervened when the RCMP arrested his friend Gene Lyne. A sad fact in Canada is that you will be arrested and charged if you are a victim of police misconduct. Intervening in a case of police misconduct is considered by the police to be a criminal offence in Canada.

Mr Dempsey had Torsion Dystonia, deep brain stimulator and was taking medication to control his shaking.

Deep brain stimulator is a surgical treatment where electrodes are implanted into the brain. A brain pacemaker sends electrical impulses to the implanted electrodes in the brain. The therapeutic benefits for people with Parkinson’s and Dystonia is well documented.

What is not well documented is the effect of being Tasered would have on someone with implanted electrodes in the brain. The deep brain stimulator was destroyed by the Taser. Mr Dempsey walked into traffic on one of BC’s main highways shortly after. What else was destroyed by the Taser?

All the charges against both men were later stayed or dismissed in court. Was this a result of a Crown prosecutor viewing the video tape?

Jamie Ashby, a lawyer filed a claim for damages on behalf of Gene Lyne and John Dempsey. Mr Ashby is reported as saying: "He's passed away so the case dies with him,"
Mr Ashby is continuing with the claim for Gene Lyne.

The law in Canada protects disclosure. Mr Ashby is now trying to prevent the distribution of the video tape that he gave to the press. This law may be good for lawyers who can use the disclosure as leverage to obtain a out of court settlement where the disclosure is sealed by the court. Pay out large sums of the tax payers money and allow the RCMP to continue abusing their power in Canada. This is not good for the RCMP’s next victim of abuse.

Where are Mr Dempsey’s relatives? Where are all the people who claim to speak for the disabled in Canada? The police in Canada are only allowed to use a Taser when their lives are in danger or the lives of others. How could a disabled man that was handcuffed be considered a threat?

Justice for John Dempsey. Distribute the link to the tape posted on starchamberproceedings.ca

YouTube - CTV: RCMP using Taser on disabled man.

Robert Latimer

Robert Latimer
NATIONAL PAROLE BOARD
APPEAL DIVISION
DECISION

The B.C. Civil Liberties Association

News: The Women's Court

News: The Women's Court
Why not just rename the family court?

KVELLO V. MIAZGA APPEAL

In response to the post on injusticebusters web site.

Give me a break. Look at the Supreme Court of Canada judgement in the Ross, Ross and White case with emphasis on the descending judgement in the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal. Look at your case Richard and the descending judgement in the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal.

Three judges of the Supreme Court of Canada look at the material filed and decide if leave to appeal is granted or denied. They are under no obligation to state their reasons. The Coram was : McLachlin / Fish / Rothstein. The Chief Justice was involved in the Ross, Ross and White Appeal. The other two judges joined the court after and have not been involved in the past judgements of The Supreme Court of Canada involving ritual child abuse, Brian Dueck and its related case R. v. Lucas.

Many people believe, myself included that The Supreme Court of Canada was just as involved in the cover-up of the ritual satanic child abuse cases in Saskatchewan as was Saskatchewan Justice and the judges of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal. When McLachlin (R v Lucas) said that John Lucas himself said that the Thompson Papers were unbelievable, freedom of speech as I knew it, ended.

The Marlin Thompson Papers are the written disclosure of the Ross children that resulted in charges against the 16 people in the Baynton judgement. Ross, Ross and White was the first case heard in The Supreme Court of Canada involving the Saskatchewan Government/Justice self created scandal of sex with children.

The Thompson Papers are unbelievable. Detailing ritual child abuse in a manner that was sick, disgusting and not believable by anyone in their right mind. Marlin Thompson believed, Dueck believed, Miazga believed and sadly so did a large percentage of the people in Saskatoon and area. John Lucas did not.

I find the most disgusting details in the Thompson Papers is the rape of two 8 year old twin girls in the Thompson Foster home by their 10 year old Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder brother. The authorities must have been blinded by their flying cum resulting from their sick stories of sex with children. They knowingly left the Ross Twins in the Thompson home of horrors to be raped for four years and then this sick pack of nut cases blamed it all on a ten 10 year old child. The twin's brother was not the only one in need of medical help.

Is The Supreme Court of Canada going to ignore their past judgements? Chief Justice McLachlin will again place the court into disrepute in the eyes of the public if she does not excuse herself from the Dennis Kvello/Miazga appeal.

Miazga has his licence to practice law and has continued to prosecute cases in Saskatchewan with the blessing of Saskatchewan’s new government. The only licence he should have is a fishing licence. He may wish that he changed his defence to the truth, I was only following orders. We need another Sheila Steele.

Two angry sick old men

I have to ask. Why has Saskatchewan Justice decided to have a new trial for David Ahenakew?

I have read the comments about Jews made by Mr Ahenakew published in the news media and the internet.

I have read the history of Justice Paul Hrabinsky in the news and the internet. I feel sorry for him. A sick angry old man.

I do not feel sorry for David Ahenakew. Racism is the disease.

A new trial for Mr Ahenakew is not the answer. Free speech is a two-way street that is protected by the truth.

A new trial will result in two angry sick old men.

How did a respected First Nations leader acquire such a sick angry view of Jews? The same way that Canadians acquired their sick angry views of First Nations people.

KVELLO V. MIAZGA APPEAL

Updates on the Appeal at saskatchewanjustice.ca

KVELLO V. MIAZGA APPEAL

Supreme Court of Canada
Case Summary 32208

Docket 32208

GRANTED

Estate of Dennis Kvello (by his personal representative, Diane Kvello), et al. v. Carole Bunko‑Ruys, et al. (Sask.) (Civil) (By Leave) (32208)

The motions for leave to intervene by Canadian Association of Crown Counsel and Director of Public Prosecutions of Canada are dismissed. The application by Estate of Dennis Kvello (by his personal representative, Diane Kvello) et al. for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan, Number 884, 2007 SKCA 57, dated May 30, 2007, is dismissed. The application by Matthew Miazga for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan, Number 877, 2007 SKCA 57, dated May 30, 2007, is granted.

Coram: McLachlin / Fish / Rothstein

KVELLO V. MIAZGA APPEAL

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA JUDGMENTS TO BE RENDERED IN LEAVE APPLICATIONS

OTTAWA, 2008-02-04. THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA ANNOUNCED TODAY THAT JUDGMENT IN THE FOLLOWING APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL WILL BE DELIVERED AT 9:45 A.M. EST ON THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 2008.

Supreme Court of Canada
Case Summary 32208

Docket 32208

KVELLO V. MIAZGA APPEAL

Supreme Court of Canada

KVELLO V. MIAZGA APPEAL

February 2008: Update on the Appeal at saskatchewanjustice.ca

Supreme Court of Canada
Case Summary 32208

Docket 32208

Malicious Prosecution

Malicious Prosecution
Couple's suit claims malicious prosecution
Had been critical of Klassen, Kvello sex abuse case
Betty Ann Adam, The StarPhoenix
Published: Wednesday, January 30, 2008

News at Star Chamber Proceedings. Q.B. No. 616, 2007. Lucas v. Faber

The Persecution of John and Johanna Lucas 1993 - 2005

Saskatchewan Law Society. Web Site

Jonathan Pollard

URGENT! FAX PRESIDENT BUSH FOR POLLARD NOW!
J4JPnews - January 9, 2008


KING DAVID HOTEL [JERUSALEM] FAX NUMBER:
02-6208882

FROM OVERSEAS: 011-972-2-620-8882

The Committee to Bring Jonathan Pollard Home and J4JP urgently request that EVERYONE take a minute to send a fax to President Bush at the King David Hotel in Jerusalem (02-6208882) for the immediate release of Jonathan Pollard. Our goal is to inundate Mr. Bush with faxes repeating the same message over and over and over again:

Mr. Bush, Free Jonathan Pollard NOW!

FOR READY-MADE FAX MESSAGE CLICK HERE:
http://www.jonathanpollard.org/pics/2008/010208/01.pdf

SEND TO FAX NUMBER: 02-6208882

From overseas dial: 011-972-2-620-8882


Add your own personal message, if you wish, or just send the PDF message. It's easy! It takes just a few minutes. And best of all, King David Hotel staff assure us that all faxes received are delivered to Mr. Bush. Fax now! Fax often! Fax everyday for the duration of the Bush visit to Israel.

PLEASE FORWARD, RECYCLE, RECIRCULATE, AND REPRINT THIS MESSAGE!
--


--
JUSTICE FOR JONATHAN POLLARD
Website: http://www.JonathanPollard.org