The Court of Queen’s Bench is a Sick Joke

Everyone is equal before the Law. What a load of crap. John Lucas has withdrawn his Motion to have been heard February 16, 2006. Mr Lucas has been unable to obtain disclosure from the Crown. There is no point in asking when the recommendations of million dollar inquires into wrongful convictions will be implemented in Canada. The inquires are nothing more then another method to deceive the public. Nothing will change as long as corrupt judges and prosecutors are in charge of the courts and allowed to get their hands into the public purse to finance the high costs of protecting themselves.

In Saskatoon if there is a withholding of documentation by the Crown there is nothing that can be done. It would be pointless to file a motion requesting an order for disclosure of documents in a Saskatchewan court. The documentation would show the jury members the corruption within Saskatchewan Justice. The judges and prosecutors involved in the malicious prosecution of Johanna Lucas are not going to allow a prosecutor to disclose documents to Mr Lucas that would expose justice Hrabinsky for what he is, a corrupt judge.

There is no one in charge of the administration of justice in Saskatchewan. Brent Gough, a bencher with the Saskatchewan Law Society protected a corrupt lawyer, Nicolas Stooshinoff. Madam Justice G A Smith, Justice Dovell and Justice Hrabinsky abused the process of the court by protecting Nicholas Stooshinoff and conspired to retaliate against me for reporting Nicholas Stooshinoff to the Saskatoon Police. Court of Appeal Judges Nicholas Sherstobitoff, Justice Vancise and Justice Richard protect corrupt lower court judges.

Justice Nicholas Sherstobitoff, Justice Hrabinsky and Justice Vancise have a lot of experience over the past 15 years protecting a corrupt administration of justice in Saskatchewan. Doctored up case law by Justice Sherstobitoff with respect to section 173 of the rules of court and Justice Vancise and Justice Hrabinsky doctored up case law with respect to section 300 of the criminal code was not done to protect a prosecutor, social worker and police officer found guilty of malicious prosecution by Justice Baynton. These judges are protecting lawyers and judges in a corrupt court with a history of malicious prosecution and persecuting innocent people who expose them for what they are, corrupt, blackmailers and thieves.

Mr Lucas has been charged with defaming justice Paul Hrabinsky, the wrong person has been charged, it is justice Hrabinsky and Brian Dueck who should have been charged. Mr Lucas has been offered a deal with no jail time. Mr Lucas is being blackmailed, shut-up about Justice Hrabinsky or you will go to jail. Mr Lucas has a gag order that has silenced him for over two years. He is being maliciously prosecuted by Saskatchewan Justice, Justice Hrabinsky and his higher and lower court gang of corrupt friends.

Mr Lucas is receiving special treatment by Saskatchewan Justice. He is denied a full disclosure from the Crown as required by law. He has a gag order that protects Justice Hrabinsky, Saskatchewan Justice and Social Services. Justice Ted Malone removed himself as the trial judge after the exposure of circumstances that would have been seen as being corrupt by anyone with a belief in fairness and justice. The rules of court do not apply to John Lucas. Justice Malone provided Mr Lucas with a memorandum of Special Rules on how his “Trial By Judge & Jury”, will be conducted in Queen’s Bench. Justice Malone and his Court of Queen’s Bench Special Rules are an affront to justice as was the request to have a Court of Appeal Justice appointed as the lower court trial judge. Mr Lucas can not receive a fair trial in a corrupt court.

One of Justice Malone’s “special rules” was that Crown counsel will subpoena any witness Mr Lucas wished to call. Mr Lucas has been requesting the Crown subpoena witness’s and now its, no documents, + no witness’s, + no accuser, = no justice. Its not hard to do the math, this is another malicious prosecution.

Mr Lucas has notified the court that he will attend court from this point on, only when he is notified. The Crown has been a playing a two year + game of hide the documents and now hide the witnesses and corrupt trial judges removing themselves there is nothing to be gained by Mr Lucas continuing to request witnesses be subpoenaed and a disclosure of documents or attempting to protect himself from corrupt judges and prosecutors in a kangaroo court.