KVELLO V. MIAZGA APPEAL

In response to the post on injusticebusters web site.

Give me a break. Look at the Supreme Court of Canada judgement in the Ross, Ross and White case with emphasis on the descending judgement in the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal. Look at your case Richard and the descending judgement in the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal.

Three judges of the Supreme Court of Canada look at the material filed and decide if leave to appeal is granted or denied. They are under no obligation to state their reasons. The Coram was : McLachlin / Fish / Rothstein. The Chief Justice was involved in the Ross, Ross and White Appeal. The other two judges joined the court after and have not been involved in the past judgements of The Supreme Court of Canada involving ritual child abuse, Brian Dueck and its related case R. v. Lucas.

Many people believe, myself included that The Supreme Court of Canada was just as involved in the cover-up of the ritual satanic child abuse cases in Saskatchewan as was Saskatchewan Justice and the judges of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal. When McLachlin (R v Lucas) said that John Lucas himself said that the Thompson Papers were unbelievable, freedom of speech as I knew it, ended.

The Marlin Thompson Papers are the written disclosure of the Ross children that resulted in charges against the 16 people in the Baynton judgement. Ross, Ross and White was the first case heard in The Supreme Court of Canada involving the Saskatchewan Government/Justice self created scandal of sex with children.

The Thompson Papers are unbelievable. Detailing ritual child abuse in a manner that was sick, disgusting and not believable by anyone in their right mind. Marlin Thompson believed, Dueck believed, Miazga believed and sadly so did a large percentage of the people in Saskatoon and area. John Lucas did not.

I find the most disgusting details in the Thompson Papers is the rape of two 8 year old twin girls in the Thompson Foster home by their 10 year old Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder brother. The authorities must have been blinded by their flying cum resulting from their sick stories of sex with children. They knowingly left the Ross Twins in the Thompson home of horrors to be raped for four years and then this sick pack of nut cases blamed it all on a ten 10 year old child. The twin's brother was not the only one in need of medical help.

Is The Supreme Court of Canada going to ignore their past judgements? Chief Justice McLachlin will again place the court into disrepute in the eyes of the public if she does not excuse herself from the Dennis Kvello/Miazga appeal.

Miazga has his licence to practice law and has continued to prosecute cases in Saskatchewan with the blessing of Saskatchewan’s new government. The only licence he should have is a fishing licence. He may wish that he changed his defence to the truth, I was only following orders. We need another Sheila Steele.

Two angry sick old men

I have to ask. Why has Saskatchewan Justice decided to have a new trial for David Ahenakew?

I have read the comments about Jews made by Mr Ahenakew published in the news media and the internet.

I have read the history of Justice Paul Hrabinsky in the news and the internet. I feel sorry for him. A sick angry old man.

I do not feel sorry for David Ahenakew. Racism is the disease.

A new trial for Mr Ahenakew is not the answer. Free speech is a two-way street that is protected by the truth.

A new trial will result in two angry sick old men.

How did a respected First Nations leader acquire such a sick angry view of Jews? The same way that Canadians acquired their sick angry views of First Nations people.

KVELLO V. MIAZGA APPEAL

Updates on the Appeal at saskatchewanjustice.ca

KVELLO V. MIAZGA APPEAL

Supreme Court of Canada
Case Summary 32208

Docket 32208

GRANTED

Estate of Dennis Kvello (by his personal representative, Diane Kvello), et al. v. Carole Bunko‑Ruys, et al. (Sask.) (Civil) (By Leave) (32208)

The motions for leave to intervene by Canadian Association of Crown Counsel and Director of Public Prosecutions of Canada are dismissed. The application by Estate of Dennis Kvello (by his personal representative, Diane Kvello) et al. for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan, Number 884, 2007 SKCA 57, dated May 30, 2007, is dismissed. The application by Matthew Miazga for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan, Number 877, 2007 SKCA 57, dated May 30, 2007, is granted.

Coram: McLachlin / Fish / Rothstein

KVELLO V. MIAZGA APPEAL

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA JUDGMENTS TO BE RENDERED IN LEAVE APPLICATIONS

OTTAWA, 2008-02-04. THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA ANNOUNCED TODAY THAT JUDGMENT IN THE FOLLOWING APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL WILL BE DELIVERED AT 9:45 A.M. EST ON THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 2008.

Supreme Court of Canada
Case Summary 32208

Docket 32208

KVELLO V. MIAZGA APPEAL

Supreme Court of Canada

KVELLO V. MIAZGA APPEAL

February 2008: Update on the Appeal at saskatchewanjustice.ca

Supreme Court of Canada
Case Summary 32208

Docket 32208