John Lucas: Justice Kyle’s gag order.

This gag order is not only an abuse of the process of the court it is an embarrassment for the other judges in the Court of Queen’s Bench who believe in fairness, charter rights and equal justice for all.

The Honourable Justice L. A. Kyle’s January 8th 2004, CONDITIONS;

The Judicial Persecution of John Lucas Continues

The John Lucas jury trial is set for October, 2006 in the Court of Queen‘s Bench in Saskatoon. Johanna and John Lucas were jailed in 1995 by Justice Paul Hrabinsky in corrupt court proceedings to protect Saskatchewan Justice from embarrassment as a result of the Ross, Ross and White ritual child abuse trial.

All the judges involved along with Brian Dueck, Saskatoon Police Service, Saskatchewan Justice and Social Services left two 8 year old girls to be raped for four years.

John and Johanna Lucas were again arrested after John picketed the Court of Queen’s Bench during the KVELLO V. MIAZGA civil trial in Saskatoon. He had a few choice words to say about Justice Hrabinsky, Brian Dueck and the Chief Justice and the other religious nut cases who left 8 year old girls to be raped in Saskatchewan.

You want to hear about corrupt sick judges, a 12 year persecution and conspiracy to defraud the public by Saskatchewan Justice stay tuned. It is time the public heard the truth about Justice Hrabinsky and his religious nut case pals in the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal.

Johanna Lucas with the help of her family have a web site. saskatchewanjustice.ca Gunn & Quinney

saskatchewanjustice.ca

John Lucas’s plea of justification is below.

NJ 7 of 2004
IN THE COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH FOR SASKATCHEWAN
JUDICIAL CENTRE OF SASKATOON

BETWEEN:
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
-and-
JOHN DAVID LUCAS

A PLEA OF JUSTIFICATION

In reply to the following INDICTMENT & all parts of Information: 44911275, upon which it was based, the accused John David Lucas, is entering this written PLEA OF JUSTIFICATION, as provided for under Section 611, of the CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA.

INDICTMENT BEFORE THE COURT

JOHN DAVID LUCAS, of the City of Saskatoon, in the Province of Saskatchewan, stands charged that:

(1) Between the 8th day of September, A.D. 2003 and the 15th day of September, A.D. 2003 at or near SASKATOON, SASKATCHEWAN, did

PUBLISH MATTER WITHOUT LAWFUL JUSTIFICATION OR EXCUSE THAT WAS LIKELY TO INJURE THE REPUTATION OF JUSTICE PAUL HRABINSKY BY EXPOSING HIM TO HATRED, CONTEMPT OR RIDICULE, OR THAT WAS DESIGNED TO INSULT JUSTICE PAUL HRABINSKY KNOWING THAT THE MATTER WAS FALSE AND DID THEREBY COMMIT AN OFFENCE, CONTRARY TO SECTION 300 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE.

Dated at the City of Regina, in the province of Saskatchewan, this 25th day of May, A.D. 2005.
__________________________________________
JEFF KALMAKOFF
AGENT OF THE ATORNEY GENERAL
FOR THE PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN

1. In order to comply with Section 611(3), the accused claims without any qualification, that it is always in the “public good” to expose corruption within the justice system.

2. Before making any allegation regarding Mr. Justice Hrabinsky public, the accused spent more than 3,000 hours investigating the related case (cases).
3. Before using the truth to inflame the public, the accused made all of his concerns known to the authorities.

4. Before actually postering the allegations, the accused made sure that Mr. Justice Hrabinsky was given a chance to obtain an interim injunction from the Court of Queen’s Bench, in case he wanted to dispute the truth and or, avoid any of the associated embarrassment.

5. The originating Indictment read as follows:

IN THE COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH, CRIMINAL JURY
JUDICIAL CENTRE OF SASKATOON
Information: 44911275
CANADA
PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
-against-
JOHN DAVID LUCAS

INDICTMENT
JOHN DAVID LUCAS, of the City of Saskatoon, in the Province of Saskatchewan, stands charged that:

(1) Between the 8th day of September, A.D. 2003 and the 15th day of September, A.D. 2003 at or near SASKATOON, SASKATCHEWAN, did

COMMIT A CONTEMPT OF COURT BY CAUSING POSTERS TO BE DISPLAYED WHICH WERE CONTEMPTUOUS OF JUSTICE PAUL HRABINSKY, A JUDGE OF THE COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH FOR SASKATCHEWAN CONTRARY TO LAW.

(2) Between the 8th day of September, A.D. 2003 and the 15th day of September, A.D. 2003 at or near SASKATOON, SASKATCHEWAN, did

PUBLISH MATTER WITHOUT LAWFUL JUSTIFICATION OR EXCUSE THAT WAS LIKELY TO INJURE THE REPUTATION OF JUSTICE PAUL HRABINSKY BY EXPOSING HIM TO HATRED, CONTEMPT OR RIDICULE, OR THAT WAS DESIGNED TO INSULT JUSTICE PAUL HRABINSKY KNOWING THAT THE MATTER WAS FALSE AND DID THEREBY COMMIT AN OFFENCE, CONTRARY TO SECTION 300 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE.

(3) Between the 8th day of September, A.D. 2003 and the 15th day of September, A.D. 2003 at or near SASKATOON, SASKATCHEWAN, did

PUBLISH MATTER WITHOUT LAWFUL JUSTIFICATION OR EXCUSE THAT WAS LIKELY TO INJURE THE REPUTATION OF SUPERINTENDENT BRIAN DUECK, A PEACE OFFICE BY EXPOSING HIM TO HATRED, CONTEMPT OR RIDICULE, OR THAT WAS DESIGNED TO INSULT SUPERINTENDENT BRIAN DUECK KNOWING THAT THE MATTER WAS FALSE AND DID THEREBY COMMIT AN OFFENCE, CONTRARY TO SECTION 300 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE.

(4) On or about the 15th day of September, A.D. 2003 at or near SASKATOON, SASKATCHEWAN did

PUBLISH MATTER WITHOUT LAWFUL JUSTIFICATION OR EXCUSE THAT WAS LIKELY TO INJURE THE REPUTATION OF ROD DONLEVY BY EXPOSING HIM TO HATRED, CONTEMPT OR RIDICULE, OR THAT WAS DESIGNED TO INSULT ROD DONLEVY KNOWING THAT THE MATTER WAS FALSE AND DID THEREBY COMMIT AN OFFENCE CONTRARY TO SECTION 300 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE.

DATED AT the City of Saskatoon, in the Province of Saskatchewan, this 12 day of February, 2004.
__________________________

THOMAS B. MACNAB
AGENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
FOR THE PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN
6. Please Note:

The police also used Information # 44911275 to charge my wife, Johanna Erna Lucas. Her charges were withdrawn without any explanation, before the preliminary hearing.

7. The accused is confident that it will take the jury less than 5% of the 3,000 hours mentioned, in order to become fully conversant with those parts of the case that are relevant to the remaining charge before the court.

8. While it is alleged that the relevant dates occurred, “Between the 8th day of September, A.D. 2003 and the 15th day of September, A.D. 2003 at or near SASKATOON, SASKATCHEWAN”, the jury should be aware that Mr. Justice Hrabinsky apparently felt that I was a threat to his family. The following was taken from a Saskatoon Police Service Report.

(a) “April 17/02 1415 hrs I was requested by D/C Wiks to attend for a meeting in his office. D/C Wiks advised he had got a call from Justice Ted Malone and advised at that time he was told that Malone had received a call from Justice Paul Hrabinsky. Justice Hrabinsky apparently feared for the safety of his family as he is named in one of the pamphlets. Justice Hrabinsky convicted John and Johanna Lucas previously with defamatory libel and incarcerated them.

I phoned Justice Hrabinsky and spoke to him re: this file. He advised me he would not and could not get involved by leaving any sort of statement. Justice Hrabinsky advised he feared for the safety of his wife, Johanna. He also divulged that they were well aware of what Lucas’ and his associates looked like. He requested vehicle descriptions and associated license plates for the vehicles so that they would be aware if some happened to drive onto his cul-de-sac. I at that time told Justice Hrabinsky that I would not and could not give him vehicle plate numbers and descriptions. I explained that it was not done and would be added ammunition for the Lucas/Klassen clan if they learned that that had happened. Justice Hrabinsky advised he understood and did not push the issue.”

(b) Though the accused was not aware of the specifics of the April-November, (2002) investigation, regarding the above, he was given a small clip of a police surveillance video dealing with the “Lucas file”, from April 17th, 2002, by Mr. Klassen. After my arrest in September 2003, I was informed by more than one source that it was important that I obtain a full disclosure. By March (2005) one of my informants was getting panicky and I informed the Court of Queen’s Bench that I was taking over the job of obtaining disclosure from my lawyer, Mr. Roe. That made it impossible from Mr. Roe’s point of view to continue, so he withdrew. He was neither fired, or forced out. Within a week, Mr. Kalmakoff the prosecutor, informed the accused that he had a short conversation with the Chief Justice of Queen’s Bench, about this case (back in February), that he did not instigate. Shortly after that, Sergeant Faber, from the Saskatoon City Police Service, provided the prosecutor with the above 217 word disclosure… Towards the end of April, I was told that Mr. Justice Malone was given the job of “trial judge”, by the Chief Justice. The prosecutor requested that I try and have him recuse himself because of his involvement. I refused and told him to do his own “dirty work”. Without my informant, it is obvious I would not have received any of the disclosure. Without my informant, it is obvious that Mr. Justice Malone had every intention to handle this case. This is a text book example of how a member of the judiciary can corrupt a proceeding. When another justice found out about the attempt, he went to the Chief Justice with the approval of yet another, to request that Queen’s Bench not deal with this issue. That request was turned down by both the Chief Justice of the Court of Appeal & the Chief Justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench, after consultation.

(c) In Mr. Justice Ball’s Fiat of May 4th, 2006, he finds no basis for calling either Deputy Chief Wiks, or Mr. Justice Malone, as witnesses. The fact that an attempt was made by more than one member of the judiciary to have this case “handled”, is one thing, but it goes much further than that. An allegation was made by a justice to the police, that I was a threat to his family and or wife. That can’t be allowed to stand without some sort of hearing. How can I expect to get any sort of fair trial with that allegation, even if the jury is not informed. To make my point, I want to go back to January 8, 2003. Mr. Thomas B. Macnab, was the prosecutor at the time and he had decided after consulting with Regina, that I did not pose a serious threat to the community if I was released. Mr. Justice Kyle, vehemently took the opposite position, obviously acting on information that the accused didn’t know about. It would be ludicrous to now claim that this has no relevance. It would also be ludicrous for anyone to assume that I would receive a fair sentence, if I was found guilty.

(d) We are also left dealing with another little fairy tale. Sergeant Faber has informed Mr. Kalmakoff, that Deputy Chief Wiks, kept NO NOTES of his conversation with Mr. Justice Malone. That is absolutely preposterous.

9. While it was my intention to attach a list of the material that I wanted entered with this “Plea Of Justification”, the “Justice Malone Affair”, makes it impossible. Now that the Q.B. 271 matter was heard by the Court of Appeal, I want the entire file returned to Saskatoon. Mr. Kalmakoff and I could work our way quickly through it in a few hours and set aside any documents that we can’t agree on. I will also be including several items that prove beyond any doubt that the Court of Queen’s Bench, as an institution, are fully aware that Dueck, misled Saskatchewan Justice. While I fully understand why Mr. Justice Kyle & Mr. Justice Malone, acted as they did, that does not make it right. The innuendo that I was planning to do anything other than expose Mr. Justice Hrabinsky, makes this matter impossible for me to defend, unless I am given an opportunity prior my trial to deal with all of these issues in Queen’s Bench, with a few of the witnesses, under oath.
10. This document should be considered my “Plea Of Justification” in full, if Queen’s Bench decides that Mr. Justice Malone & Deputy Chief Wiks, will not be called as witnesses. This accused never threatened to kill or maim any member of the judiciary, justice, or the constabulary, period.

Dated at Macrorie, Saskatchewan, this 10th day of May, 2006.
______________________________
Applicant: John David Lucas
J. Lucas
Box 92, Macrorie, Saskatchewan S0L 2E0
Tel./Fax: (306) 243-4812
starchamber@sasktel.net

Miazga/Klassen Appeal: Lies and cover-up continue from the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal.

Reported by James Wood of The StarPhoenix

“There were 16 people charged in 1991 with more than 70 counts of sexual assault involving foster children. In 1993, all the charges were stayed just before criminal trials were set to begin when Peter Klassen pleaded guilty to four sexual assault charges. Peter Klassen was the father of several of the accused, including the most high-profile, Richard Klassen.”

The above is not true. This so called newspaper has been lying and deceiving the public for over 15 years in Saskatchewan. This is not true, “all the charges were stayed just before criminal trials were set to begin“.

Three of the 16 people charged were jailed in Saskatchewan based on nothing more then the ranting of sick religious nut case judges and officers of the court.

From the Baynton Judgement.
[32] As I noted previously, the criminal proceedings involved four individuals who are not plaintiffs in this civil action. These four individuals were also charged in connection with alleged assaults on some of the same children who had made false allegations against the plaintiffs. Three of these individuals are the natural father and mother and a boyfriend of the mother of the [R.] children (the three children who testified in the case before me). These three individuals were prosecuted by means of a separate preliminary inquiry and trial. They were convicted and sentenced at trial, their convictions were upheld by a majority decision of the Court of Appeal but those convictions were overturned by the Supreme Court of Canada. The boyfriend was acquitted and a new trial was directed respecting the father and mother. The Crown did not proceed with the new trial or take any further action against these three individuals. I will refer to the criminal proceedings involving them as the "[R.], [R.] and White" proceedings.

The "[R.], [R.] and White" proceedings in Saskatchewan have been sealed, gagged and otherwise buried by Saskatchewan Justice and Saskatchewan’s religious extremist judges.

From the Baynton Judgement paragraph [1]:

[1] In July 1991, 16 individuals were arrested and charged with over 70 counts of sexual assault against eight foster children. Many of the children's allegations of sexual abuse were bizarre and revolting because they involved group and ritualistic sex with satanic overtones, the sexual abuse and killing of babies and animals, the ingestion of human flesh, feces, urine, blood and other horrible, perverted and incredible acts.

The above was the evidence at the "[R.], [R.] and White" trial. Don’t bother looking for the case law. It has been gagged and sealed.

The Saskatchewan Appeal was heard by The Honourable Mr. Justice Cameron, The Honourable Mr. Justice Vancise and The Honourable Madame Justice Gerwing.

The Appeal was nothing more then a way to further gag and seal by Saskatchewan Justice. The descending judgement by Justice Cameron was to open the door to the Supreme Court of Canada and have the case returned to the Court of Queen’s Bench where Saskatchewan Justice could stay the proceedings and continue to gag and seal the truth.

This sealing and gagging continued with the Lucas case by justice Hrabinsky. The Lucas’s were jailed by Justice Hrabinsky because they were telling the truth about what happened to the Ross children. The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal judges who heard the Lucas Appeal were: The Honourable Mr. Justice Tallis, The Honourable Mr. Justice Vancise and The Honourable Mr. Justice Lane.

The StarPhoenix reported: “Holgate said Bunko-Ruys was involved with the case from the very start, but he came under sharp questioning from Justice Nicholas Sherstobitoff over where the evidence was to support that contention. “

What is this judge talking about. The evidence that Bunko-Ruys was involved with the case from the very start can not be disputed. The evidence was gagged and sealed by a succession of corrupt Saskatchewan Judges including Justice Sherstobitoff.

How many times are judges in this sick court going to take advantage of Edwards Holgate’s disability. Mr Holgate will start stuttering when he is treated like a piece of garbage to be verbally abused by sick angry idiot judges. It was done to Mr Holgate at the Lucas Appeal. He was told to “sit down, shut up, and do not say another word.” It is done deliberately by angry judges who for over 15 years have been lying and slandering anyone that tells the truth about Saskatchewan’s Christian religious nut cases judges, the Ross, Ross & White case or what happened to the Ross children.

Justice Gary Lane, Justice Vancise and Nicholas Sherstobitoff will be cooking up another corrupt judgement from the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal. What are they protecting? Keep the public from finding out about the Ross, Ross & White case, the jailing of Johanna and John Lucas by a corrupt justice Hrabinsky and the rape of two 8 year old girls. This is sick justice.

Hathway: Application dismissed.

Mr. Hathway’s application is dismissed in its entirety. The secrecy continues.

Accordingly, there will be an order that the “Brief” and “Tabs 1 - 54" be sealed in an envelope, pending further order of this court.

April 27, 2006 Hathway pdf

AIDWYC:Gordon Folland

On January 27, 2005, the Court of Appeal of Ontario granted Gordon Folland the right to sue his trial lawyer for negligently defending him.

Lucas: Queen’s Bench Justice Paul Hrabinsky will testify for the Crown.

The jury trial in the Saskatoon Court of Queen’s Bench is set for October 2nd, to 13th 2006.

John Lucas is charged with defaming justice Hrabinsky. Mr Lucas has been charged with a criminal offence for truthful saying what everyone with knowledge of the cases knows to be true. It may be Mr Lucas who goes to jail, it is not Mr Lucas who is on trial, its Justice Hrabinsky and his sick judicial pals.

Johanna and John Lucas were charged and jailed in 1995 by Justice Hrabinsky, Brian Dueck and corrupt prosecutors in corrupt court proceeding. This was in an attempt to keep the public from finding out a pack of delusional religious devil worshiping nut case politicians, judges, social workers, police officers and prosecutors had jailed innocent people because they were members of a cult that was sexually assaulting children, sacrificing babies and barbecuing them.

Welcome to Saskatchewan. If you come to visit you should be white, Christen, have a bible, a strong belief in the devil, a hatred for Aboriginals, gays and lesbians. You can publish in the local newspapers any hateful trash targeting anyone that you believe is not a Christian. As long as you have a radical belief in the bible, and the devil, you can leave children to be raped in Saskatoon.

If you are considering opening a business in Saskatchewan you will find the friendliest people in Canada to work for you. If your business may become involved in court proceeding you will find the courts to be fair as long as the court case does not involve freedom of speech, or an established Saskatchewan corporation involved in mining, forestry or farming. If the court case may involve racism, religion or hate issues then a Saskatchewan court will welcome you if you are a member of the KKK, or some hate group. You don’t have to bring your white sheet to Saskatchewan, bring a judicial robe.

If you are thinking of moving to Saskatchewan and have children who have unusual or medical problems that are in any way sexual related you will risk having your children apprehended in Saskatchewan. If you are into raping children you will have no problem, as long as they are Aboriginal children or women.

The Lucas trial in October is the closest the people of Saskatoon will get to an inquiry into Justice Hrabinsky’s corrupt court. The truth about what happened to the Ross twins in Saskatchewan and why Saskatchewan Justice left the twins to be raped is well documented. It was not documented by John Lucas, it was documented by Saskatchewan Justice. The Lucas case needs to go to trial, the people have a right to hear the truth about this piece of judicial crap.

CHIEF JUSTICE McLACHLIN AS A SPIN DOCTOR

When researching the Canadian Judicial Counsel and its leader who I referred to as a spin doctor in one of my Lucas posts (A Criminal Waste of Time and Money) I came across a web site that also quoted Pierre Trudeau and his speech about the Supreme Court of Canada.

There is a good article about Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin on Real Women of Canada. This world famous spin doctor has been lying and deceiving Canadians in her speeches about the courts in Canada for years. If she keeps it up she may start believing her own lies, or is she past the point of no return.

CHIEF JUSTICE McLACHLIN AS A SPIN DOCTOR

Real Women of Canada home page
http://www.realwomenca.com/index.html