How many people in Saskatoon who have taken the time to read the Baynton Judgement believe that Michael Cardamone is guilty? How many people in Saskatoon that have taken the time to read the Batten Judgement and the descending written judgement of Mr. Justice Vancise believe that Mr Cardamone is guilty? How many people who watched the Fifth Estate program “Scandal of the Century” and the Ross twins recant their testimony believe that Michael Cardamone is guilty? How many people know this was not the first time one of the Ross children recanted? The Ross children are victims, it took courage, guts and a belief in doing what was right to come forward, the Ross twins did this on their own with no pressure from anyone.
The age of the child in the Cardamone story that started the hunt was 7 years. The age of the Ross twins when the hunt first started in Saskatoon was 5. I will repeat that for the people who seem to think that these children are liars, perverts in the making, have not taken responsibility for their lies, are responsible for destroying lives and the other crap on the internet about these children that has left them with guilt and apologizing. They were between 5 and 10 years old! They were manipulated and used, not only by the people in charge of their care, but by doctors, lawyers and judges, and now they are insulted by posts on the internet. What is more important, the image of a court, or the rape of a child?
The three Ross children had no one to care for them, they were three fetal-alcohol damaged dysfunction children who for years were left in the control of people who believed in "brood mares", sacrificing and eating babies. Every judge that heard the cases knew the twins were being raped and assaulted, the lawyers, government officials, everyone knew, and did nothing. When five people picketed to let the public know they were arrested and placed under gag orders. For over ten years three judges of the Court of Queen’s Bench sealed documents, issued gag orders, secret orders, publication bans and to top it off after over ten years a judge said, “The children realize the enormity of the tragedy that has been suffered by the plaintiffs as a result of their false allegations. Although they are to be commended for their courage in admitting the wrongs that they committed, I am not convinced that they yet accept responsibility for them.”
The children are not responsible. Read the judgement of Madam Justice Batten and then read the descending judgement of Justice Vancise. It is clear who is responsible, it is also clear who is responsible for the over ten year cover-up nightmare suffered by innocent people charged and the persecution and gag order of John Lucas who tried to help two twin girls who were left for 43 months, between May 29th 1990 & January, 1994 to be raped and assaulted.
Mr Lucas’s gag order not only prevents him from contacting his own children, it isolates and prevents him from defending himself. Their telephone conversations and internet connections are monitored. His wife had a heart attack shortly after she was arrested the last time, she was held in jail for two days so their home could be ransacked. The July 6th, 2004 order amending the gag order was to allow Mr Lucas to accompany his wife to the hospital. It is time for the gag order to be removed, he has no need to picket, let the truth be heard at his jury trial in October 2005, until then take the gag order off, stop blaming the children and let people testify on behalf of Mr Lucas concerning the credibility of his accusers.
Justice Baynton said in his judgement: “the defendants focused on the minute detail and never stood back to view the case in full perspective. Had any of them done so, I would not be giving judgment in this case.”
If any of the parents in the Cardamone case left their children alone with people who in the article By Christy Gutowski Daily Herald Legal Affairs Writer, March 12, 2005 made statements like: “a serial child molester who methodically manipulated his gymnasts so that the young girls endured repeated abuse rather than betray him.” - "This defendant violated the trust of these children and their parents," - "To betray that trust and violate the innocence of a child is matched by only one offense, and that's murder." - “a pickpocket whose masterful thievery went undetected until his arrest in late 2002.”. These parents need to stand back and view the case in full perspective, read the Baynton Judgement. Justice Baynton’s Judgement should be required reading in all social work classes and Law Schools.
The article by Christy Gutowski also said: “They did not have forensics, solid witnesses or his confession to support their words. In fact, many coaches, gymnasts and parents called them liars.” The children are not “liars.” If any of the parents were to take their child to a qualified doctor not connected to the case, he or she could explain to them what it is. If they do not take their child to a doctor in about 10 years time their children will be victims, ask the Ross twins what it is like to be victims.
The charges could not have proceeded without the supporting testimony of a doctor. There was a time when people had respect for and trusted doctors. This ended when medical associations started protecting doctors instead of protecting the public. Removing the licence or disciplining incompetent doctors ended when court judgements against incompetent doctors resulted in large court settlements and higher insurance costs for doctors. Excellent qualified doctors had to stop doing some procedures as a result of high insurance costs. The doctors would have found themselves in the same boat as churches across Canada. The churches were looking at having to sell the churches to pay the settlements as a result of Canadians turning a blind eye to years of people claiming to be Christians raping and assaulting children. The incompetent doctors are protected by the medical associations, the information is kept private, the tactics the doctors insurance companies use leave it imposable for people to afford the legal costs of a court action. The result is doctors who kill people, drug dealers, doctors who have decided themselves that they are experts and other low life’s unheard of in the profession in the past.
The same can be said of the legal profession and Law Societies. There was a time when people had respect for and trusted police officers, social workers, judges, and believe it or not, lawyers.
It will take more than the wild ranting of a prosecutor and a doctor claiming to be an expert to convince me that Mr Cardamone is guilty. Mr Cardamone is not the only victim.
Tuesday, March 22, 2005
Thursday, March 17, 2005
Sheila Steele - Richard Klassen MLA? - John Lucas Trial
Post From Injusticebusters BlogSaskatchewan: Culture-of-injustice
Excellent post Sheila. What I'd really like to see is you or Mr. Klassen contest the next election as an independent candidate in Frank Quennell's riding. Imho, he has been a complete disappointment as injustice minister.
Go find your own candidates for Frank Quennell’s riding. We need Sheila or Richard Klassen to run in Riversdale. We are not going to put up with this attempt to entice them to run in City Park. I encouraged Mr Klassen to run in the next provincial election in Riversdale in my post on January 16 and I think that he will not take this underhanded dirty politics lightly. All kidding aside I agree with you Jacob, Sheila and Mr Klassen should run in the next election, a guaranteed win. A vote for Mr Quennell, Mr Morgan or Mr Calvert is a vote for injustice.
Frank Quennell’s riding will be an easy win for an independent candidate. One of his supporters in the last election refused to attend his Christmas party saying that he would not attend unless Mr Quennell invited the Sterling family, Klassen Family and John Lucas and his wife. Had Mr Quennell appealed the Judgement of Justice Baynton before the last election he would have been looking for a job like the federal NDP candidates who had the misfortune of being associated with the Saskatchewan NDP. Hopefully, Mr Quennell will see the writing on the wall and resign like his predecessor.
If there was a lawyer in Saskatchewan with morals, integrity and above reproach willing to run in the next provincial election to replace Mr Quennell, their good name would be dishonoured by the letterhead, Saskatchewan Justice.
The Premier of Saskatchewan Lorne Calvert, from the time that Tommy Douglas was voted the Greatest Canadian, has been referring to Mr Douglas at every opportunity in his speeches, making a movie and pointing out that they both have a religious background as church ministers. This is an insult to the memory of Tommy Douglas. The Saskatchewan legacy of Mr Romano and Lorne Calvert’s government is nothing short of a disaster and association with Tommy Douglas will not change that, or get Mr Calvert re-elected. Mr Calvert seems to be hanging on to the coat tail of Tommy Douglas and the Premier of Newfoundland who obtained billions for the people of Newfoundland because of his competence, Mr Calvert may be limited as a result of reaching his level of incompetence.
The movie being made about Tommy Douglas should be about Mr Douglas, not the NDP. The NDP legacy is well documented in Fifth Estate documentary’s, the satanic child abuse case law, Justice Baynton’s Judgement, the separation and removal from the province by social services of two twin girls named Ross, the persuasion of John Lucas and his wife and the lawyers fairytale movie being made about Richard Klassen’s 10 plus year struggle for justice. Mr Calvert’s legacy is overwhelming, Mr Douglas’s legacy is above reproach and enjoyed by all Canadians.
John Lucas is going to trial in October 2005. It is going to be a jury trial. If the crown does not pad the jury, withhold evidence or any of its other known tricks Mr Lucas should receive a fair trial this time. Assuming that Mr Lucas will have the right to question his accusers, the crown may have a dilemma in selecting jury members who have not had access to a computer or newspapers for over 10 years and would be willing to give any credibility to the testimony of Justice Hrabinsky.
The thought of Sheila and Richard Klassen being elected in Saskatchewan results in a smile on my face. Think of the fun they could have, an independent trusted voice of the people is desperately needed. An independent voice is better than no voice. The first order of business could be to find out why two twin girl victims of Saskatchewan Justice and Social Services were separated and dumped in BC like they were Saskatchewan damaged goods. That should not have happened, the reason could be the same as why no one was held accountable as a result of Justice Baynton’s Judgement, why John Lucas has a gag order, why the girls former foster parents have disappeared and why it is very unlikely that Justice Hrabinsky will testify and John Lucas will not receive a fair trial, again.
Excellent post Sheila. What I'd really like to see is you or Mr. Klassen contest the next election as an independent candidate in Frank Quennell's riding. Imho, he has been a complete disappointment as injustice minister.
Go find your own candidates for Frank Quennell’s riding. We need Sheila or Richard Klassen to run in Riversdale. We are not going to put up with this attempt to entice them to run in City Park. I encouraged Mr Klassen to run in the next provincial election in Riversdale in my post on January 16 and I think that he will not take this underhanded dirty politics lightly. All kidding aside I agree with you Jacob, Sheila and Mr Klassen should run in the next election, a guaranteed win. A vote for Mr Quennell, Mr Morgan or Mr Calvert is a vote for injustice.
Frank Quennell’s riding will be an easy win for an independent candidate. One of his supporters in the last election refused to attend his Christmas party saying that he would not attend unless Mr Quennell invited the Sterling family, Klassen Family and John Lucas and his wife. Had Mr Quennell appealed the Judgement of Justice Baynton before the last election he would have been looking for a job like the federal NDP candidates who had the misfortune of being associated with the Saskatchewan NDP. Hopefully, Mr Quennell will see the writing on the wall and resign like his predecessor.
If there was a lawyer in Saskatchewan with morals, integrity and above reproach willing to run in the next provincial election to replace Mr Quennell, their good name would be dishonoured by the letterhead, Saskatchewan Justice.
The Premier of Saskatchewan Lorne Calvert, from the time that Tommy Douglas was voted the Greatest Canadian, has been referring to Mr Douglas at every opportunity in his speeches, making a movie and pointing out that they both have a religious background as church ministers. This is an insult to the memory of Tommy Douglas. The Saskatchewan legacy of Mr Romano and Lorne Calvert’s government is nothing short of a disaster and association with Tommy Douglas will not change that, or get Mr Calvert re-elected. Mr Calvert seems to be hanging on to the coat tail of Tommy Douglas and the Premier of Newfoundland who obtained billions for the people of Newfoundland because of his competence, Mr Calvert may be limited as a result of reaching his level of incompetence.
The movie being made about Tommy Douglas should be about Mr Douglas, not the NDP. The NDP legacy is well documented in Fifth Estate documentary’s, the satanic child abuse case law, Justice Baynton’s Judgement, the separation and removal from the province by social services of two twin girls named Ross, the persuasion of John Lucas and his wife and the lawyers fairytale movie being made about Richard Klassen’s 10 plus year struggle for justice. Mr Calvert’s legacy is overwhelming, Mr Douglas’s legacy is above reproach and enjoyed by all Canadians.
John Lucas is going to trial in October 2005. It is going to be a jury trial. If the crown does not pad the jury, withhold evidence or any of its other known tricks Mr Lucas should receive a fair trial this time. Assuming that Mr Lucas will have the right to question his accusers, the crown may have a dilemma in selecting jury members who have not had access to a computer or newspapers for over 10 years and would be willing to give any credibility to the testimony of Justice Hrabinsky.
The thought of Sheila and Richard Klassen being elected in Saskatchewan results in a smile on my face. Think of the fun they could have, an independent trusted voice of the people is desperately needed. An independent voice is better than no voice. The first order of business could be to find out why two twin girl victims of Saskatchewan Justice and Social Services were separated and dumped in BC like they were Saskatchewan damaged goods. That should not have happened, the reason could be the same as why no one was held accountable as a result of Justice Baynton’s Judgement, why John Lucas has a gag order, why the girls former foster parents have disappeared and why it is very unlikely that Justice Hrabinsky will testify and John Lucas will not receive a fair trial, again.
Wednesday, March 09, 2005
My responce to Red Deer post on injusticebusters Blog
Hello to Red Deer
The court in Red Deer sounds like the Court of Queen’s Bench in Saskatoon. I helped a friend represent himself when a lawyer placed a false claim of lien on his property under The Builders Lien Act. I reported this lawyer and others to the police and the prosecutors reason for not laying charges was that it was a civil matter. The moment cash sales receipts were copied on to charge invoices and used by a lawyer to file a false Statement of Claim and caveat based on forged documents it became a criminal matter.
His first Notice of Motion filed to obtain an order for documents was heard by a judge who would have put this lawyer in jail if he had known that the lawyer was lying to him. There are excellent lawyers, police officers and judges, they are in the same boat as you and many other Canadians including myself. There is no procedure to deal with corruption within the administration of justice, courts and prosecutors office. He tried to hire a lawyer but all the lawyers he talked to referred him to a Bencher with the Saskatchewan Law Society. He could not afford a $5000.00 retainer and $300.00 per hour.
His second Notice of Motion detailed the scam in his affidavit, the judge ignored its contents and a warning from his doctor, he was rushed to the hospital in serious condition three hours after court..
His wife then tried to hire a lawyer, she was referred to another Bencher with the Saskatchewan Law Society. When she got to his office he told her that the lawyer her husband was referred to was waiting in his office for her. When she parked her car in front of this Bencher’s office building the lawyer who filed the false claim was waiting for her on the sidewalk. There is no question that the Benchers with the Saskatchewan Law Society were protecting a corrupt lawyer. There are many lawyer scams, this one involves employees of a major building supplier, contractors and lawyers who would claim that building materials were not paid for, using false documents the lawyer would place a caveat on a homeowners property and blackmail the homeowner. If the homeowner tries to represent himself one of “The whole judicial system is at issue -- it's worth more than one person” judge will hear the case and along with the prosecutors office and the Law Society they will protect the blackmailers. The homeowner had no choice but to pay up. He would have been put into the hospital again as there is no way that he could have his case heard by one of the many excellent judges in the Court of Queen’s Bench.
When my wife filed for a divorce her lawyer was a former law partner of the lawyer I reported to the police and the judge who heard the case was also a former law partner.
I am disabled with a rare movement disorder that effects my muscles and I have a degenerated spine. I borrowed money for a lawyer and was railroaded to a pre-trial. My lawyer refused to contact my doctors. My lawyer was surprised to find that the divorce file was not in the family court registry, it was in the Queen’s Bench registry. It was the personal property of Justice Hrabinsky. My lawyer filed a pre-trial brief without letting me see it that contained old medical information. When my wife moved out she took all my personal papers including medical documents. He could have only obtained this information from my wife’s lawyer. I told this lawyer that I had a problem with a past employer and my wife’s lawyer claimed that I worked under the table for this employer. They were trying to discredit me by claiming my claimed income was low, not because I am disabled, but because I worked for cash and cheated on my income tax.
The court ignored a letter from my doctor that said that my attending the pre-trial would have a serious effect on my health. Justice Hrabinsky at the pre-trial told me to get a job and was prepared to put me and my disabled mother out on the street. I ended up in the hospital. When I searched for his name on the internet I found a detailed record of his years of stomping on the Charter Rights of people and jailing innocent people. The truth was on the internet detailing his behaviour for the world to see. He could not hide from the truth.
When I received the file from my lawyer he had made reference in his notes to a third Bencher with the Law Society. Lucky me, I had three benchers with the Saskatchewan Law Society overseeing my case. A friend hired another lawyer who made an application to the court to delay the trial date, I was being railroaded to a trial. This lawyer discovered my wife and obtained undertaking for documents. He withdrew before he obtained them. My legal bill was over $6000.00 and he did not file one document on my behalf and again this lawyer did not contact my doctors.
I attended court without a lawyer and ended up on the floor by the family court registry flopping around like a fish out of water. I received a letter from the court a few days later that said if I again decided not to attend in court on the next trial date the trial would proceed without me. A few days before the trial date I receiver a letter from my wife’s lawyer saying the trial had been postponed and based on this information I did not go to court. I then received a court order. The judge was my wife‘s former law partner for five years Justice Dovell. She is also the former law partner of the lawyer I reported to the police. The order again said that if I again failed to attend in court the trial would proceed without me. It also said that the next trial date was final and read like the court would not continue to put up with my not attending court.
I again searched the internet for justice Dovell. What I found sickened me. Not only were these judges destroying lives they were protecting people who stood by and did nothing about the rape and torture of two 8 year old girls for 43 months, between May 29th 1990 & January, 1994. There was a man speaking on behalf of the children. He was jailed and is to this day being persecuted. Justice Hrabinsky and Dovell have been stomping on the Charter Rights of innocent people with gag orders, sealing documents, secret courts, just like one would expect in the former USSR. He has a gag order that prevents him from speaking that clearly has only one purpose, hide the truth.
He is being discredited because of his way of proceeding is seen as being unacceptable, after over ten years of being persecuted it may not be acceptable, but it is understandable. For over ten years he has being telling the truth. He can not put his story on the internet as he has a court gag order crammed down his throat. His name is John Lucas. I read on the injusticebusters web site that Richard Klassen was at one time so distraught that he was going to drive his car into the front door of the police station. This would not be acceptable, but it would have been understandable. I am glad he did not do that, Mr Klassen exposed the people responsible for destroying his family in spite of the combined efforts by judges, lawyers and the government of Saskatchewan to hide the truth.
My friend has my power of attorney, this is because I can have life treating adverse reactions to small amounts of prescribed medications. I am unable to direct a doctor if I am hospitalised or taken to emergency. I live in a city that is know for its caring people who help the disabled. There is no other city in Canada that is known for its volunteers like Saskatoon is. I have caring medical professional help just a phone call away. I pay 4% of the cost of my medications. I have a friendly volunteer deliver a hot meal for myself and my mother, she is completely dependant on me for her care. If I end up in the hospital a health care professional checks on my mother and sees that she is cared for. For over 20 years I have managed to keep myself off welfare by taking odd jobs. A car accident left me unable to work for five years and I sold my house and used the money to live on. I lived on peanut butter sandwiches and mended my false teeth by using glue and a patch of cloth. Without the help of volunteers and having my medical needs taken care of I would have lost my independence years ago. I bought my house with the money I received from the court judgement and my mother paid one third of its cost. I found out the hard way that lonely medicated disabled men with assets that are paid for are easy pray for women.
My friend had my doctors write letters for the court and he attached them to his affidavit and filed them before the trial. I told him that he needed to help me to get out of the court if the judge started in on me again like Justice Hrabinsky did. Justice Dovell ignored my doctors letters and it was a repeat of the pre-trial. Without his help to get me into my wheelchair and out of the court and home I would have ended up back in the hospital.
My mother found me unconscious on the bathroom floor that night, I was laying in a pool of yellow slime that I had vomited up, I was unable to move my head, my neck muscles were seized from my shoulder to the base of my skull with my head twisted up and to the left, I could not straighten out my legs as my calf muscles would seize up, my left foot was twisted in at 90 degrees and 100mg of morphine was having little effect except to sicken and leave me nauseated. I was reduced to a barnyard animal. I was unable to get into my wheelchair. I was unable to find my shoe phone and I knocked my computer key board on the floor and I sent an email for help. There was no point in my going to the hospital, there is no cure for Dystonia, all they could do would be to give me an injection of morphine and send me home again. I needed food placed in the bottom of the fridge for my mother where I could reach it and the telephone on the floor and a mattress on the living room floor. I crawled for three days in pain unable to get into my wheelchair or eat and vomiting up a yellow slime.
I read a speech by Senator Anne C. Cools about the “suicide of a 34 year old man from British Columbia named Darrin Bruce White. He had been, as had his ex-wife, a railroad locomotive engineer. He was on disability with a disposable income of about $1,000 per month. On March 1, 2000, the court ordered him to pay his ex-wife a total of $2, 071 per month, being $1,07l in child support plus $1,000.00 for spousal support for herself, with the first payment due immediately. He was ordered to pay twice his real income on disability. He disappeared a few days later and was found dead in the woods shortly thereafter. He had hanged himself. --- This man’s feelings, like many men’s feelings, were not received by the system, as money they do not have is extracted and gouged out of them. His voice is silent.” I came very close to being just another dead disabled victim of injustice that night on the bathroom floor. My voice is not silent.
My friend wrote a letter to Justice Dovell, I was very concerned when he did this as I knew what she was capable of. Her order was expected, she ordered me to continue making payments on my camping trailer until spring and then it was to be sold and half of the money given to my wife, if not for a registered caveat protecting my mothers right to live in her house it would have been ordered sold and my mother and I would have been out on the street. She ordered my house to be listed for sale within one month of the passing of my mother. She went on at great length how I did not bother to appear for court and made reference to the letter from the court saying that the trial would proceed if I failed to attend. She included the court order and made it sound like some other judge had ordered this as I had failed to attend at trial. She made no mention that she was the judge that made the order or that I did not attend because I was told the trial was postponed by her former law partner. She dismissed my doctors letters as hearsay. She went on about how I worked for cash under the table and took every opportunity to discredit me. There was not one word about my being in a wheelchair, disabled or the reasons for my disability that my doctors listed in their letters.
I started being harassed by the sheriff shortly after court. There was nothing in the order that I was required to pay until the spring when the trailer was ordered sold. This left me on the floor again. My friend arranged for a bank loan and he is making the monthly payments. He hired another lawyer paying $6000.00 and the lawyer got the sheriff off my back and filed an appeal. This lawyer has again failed to contact my doctors. This is understandable because if he proceeds with the appeal he will beaten him into the ground, he has said that he does not want Justice Dovell after him.
I do not think it fair to the owner of an internet site to include names in my posts but there is nothing that I could say about Justice Hrabinsky or Madam Justice Dovell that has not already been said. Nothing that I could say could be any worse then what is detailed about them on the internet. They are a disgrace to their profession and not only have they disgraced themselves and the court they drag the names of honest honourable lawyers and judges through the muck with them. I have included the names on my blog as there is one thing that they will never stop me from doing, telling the truth.
Red Deer could not come close to the corruption within the administration of justice in Saskatchewan. There are many people who have had their lives destroyed in Saskatchewan by corruption, dishonest lawyers and judges. I picketed the Court of Queen’s Bench the winter before last, once I got past the first hour of feeling like a goof and people stopped to talk and ask questions it became a lot easer. Justice Baynton said about Richard Klassen picketing the court that it was not wise for him to be picketing. I agree with him, not only does it show a deserving disrespect for Justice Hrabinsky’s and Dovell’s court, it is disrespectful of Justice Baynton’s court. If Justice Baynton accepts the international disgrace of his court detailed on the internet as a result of the actions of Justice Hrabinsky and Dovell then he is deserving of any disrespect for his court without my help.
My doctors have been asking for a letter from a lawyer directing them about what to include in a legal medical report. They now know the reason that a lawyer has not contacted them for over three years. They also know that I can be left crawling on the floor in pain with no way to defend myself and hospitalised again without their help. My family doctor has told my friend that I have a rare movement disorder and it is unlikely that there is anyone else in Saskatoon with a similar movement disorder or a doctor qualified to write the medical report. He said that it is difficult to have the health care pay for an out of province doctor qualified to write a report. I have been diagnosed with a movement disorder that is likely Torsion Dystonia and because it is rare the only doctor who could properly diagnose the disorder would be in the USA or Vancouver.
Justice Hrabinsky and Dovell have the power to obscure and obfuscate the truth. They have the power to dismiss my doctors letters, fabricate court orders and put me into the hospital. The one thing they can not do is hide from the truth. If this Albert Redecop and judge Crowe have done as you say then write up the truth, support it with documents and evidence and post it on the internet with your name on it. Justice Hrabinsky and Dovell have a 10 year history of hiding the truth that is detailed on the internet. Justice Dovell was appointed to the bench after people started serving Statements of Claim in regards to the Satanic child abuse cases. Her appointment to the bench is an affront to the ancient standard of honour, integrity and ethics. Her order that a conversation between a police officer and a prosecutor was subject to client lawyer privilege was a continuation of hide the truth. It was unlikely that any of the cases would make it to trial and with the sealing of documents, secret court orders, publication bans and gag orders the truth would be hidden forever. Their tunnel vision view prevented them from seeing the truth on the internet. The Baynton Judgement did not only uncovered the truth, it clearly showed the way of exposing injustice and corruption is not in a court room, it is posting the truth on the internet.
To my knowledge only one member of the legal community in Saskatoon has spoken out, he is a law professor, he said about a judgement by Justice Dovell that it was “unusual”. That was the understatement of the year. Canadians need a timely, credible and affordable way to expose these judges, lawyers and end the process of political patronage appointments to the bench.
If there was a credibly body to take complaints about Justice Hrabinsky and Dovell they would have been shown the door years ago and they would not have been allowed to abuse their power and continue to destroy lives. The Canadian Justice Review Board has asked Sheila Fraser, Auditor General of Canada to take a hard look at how the Canadian Judicial Counsel conducts its business. I have a complaint about Justice Paul Hrabinsky and Madam Justice Dovell and like so many other Canadians I have found out they are the untouchable elite. A suggestion to take my complaint to the Canadian Judicial Counsel is an insult as is a suggestion to take a complaint to the Law Society.
The Canadian Justice Review Board’s letter to Sheila Fraser could be the start of a timely and affordable way for Canadians to have corrupt judges removed from the bench. Judges hearing complaints about judges and lawyers hearing complaints about lawyers is no different than gangsters hearing complaints about gangsters. Until there is a credible way for Canadians to have their complaints heard about corrupt judges and lawyers the best way to proceed is by posting the truth on the internet. The Red Deer justice system can not possibly be worse then the detailed atrocities of corruption within the administration of justice in Saskatchewan and Saskatoon. Your post about justice Crowe may be true but without your name on your post it has no credibility. With any luck the Canadian Justice Review Board and Sheila Fraser, Auditor General of Canada will expose the Canadian Judicial Counsel for what it is, useless.
You are not dealing with overly intelligent people. They openly abuse their power in a complete vacuum of any accountability. This has been shown to be true, not one of the people found to be responsible for destroying Richard Klassen’s family are being held accountable. You are dealing with grade six bullies who are accountable to no one.
The injusticebusters web site details the injustice of wrongful convictions, Sheila Steele and Richard Klassen have shown the way, there are now web and blog pages detailing injustice and corruption from Newfoundland to Vancouver island. The power of stating the truth and putting a signature on it on the web can be seen in Justice Baynton’s Judgement. They can not hide from the truth.
James Hunter
The court in Red Deer sounds like the Court of Queen’s Bench in Saskatoon. I helped a friend represent himself when a lawyer placed a false claim of lien on his property under The Builders Lien Act. I reported this lawyer and others to the police and the prosecutors reason for not laying charges was that it was a civil matter. The moment cash sales receipts were copied on to charge invoices and used by a lawyer to file a false Statement of Claim and caveat based on forged documents it became a criminal matter.
His first Notice of Motion filed to obtain an order for documents was heard by a judge who would have put this lawyer in jail if he had known that the lawyer was lying to him. There are excellent lawyers, police officers and judges, they are in the same boat as you and many other Canadians including myself. There is no procedure to deal with corruption within the administration of justice, courts and prosecutors office. He tried to hire a lawyer but all the lawyers he talked to referred him to a Bencher with the Saskatchewan Law Society. He could not afford a $5000.00 retainer and $300.00 per hour.
His second Notice of Motion detailed the scam in his affidavit, the judge ignored its contents and a warning from his doctor, he was rushed to the hospital in serious condition three hours after court..
His wife then tried to hire a lawyer, she was referred to another Bencher with the Saskatchewan Law Society. When she got to his office he told her that the lawyer her husband was referred to was waiting in his office for her. When she parked her car in front of this Bencher’s office building the lawyer who filed the false claim was waiting for her on the sidewalk. There is no question that the Benchers with the Saskatchewan Law Society were protecting a corrupt lawyer. There are many lawyer scams, this one involves employees of a major building supplier, contractors and lawyers who would claim that building materials were not paid for, using false documents the lawyer would place a caveat on a homeowners property and blackmail the homeowner. If the homeowner tries to represent himself one of “The whole judicial system is at issue -- it's worth more than one person” judge will hear the case and along with the prosecutors office and the Law Society they will protect the blackmailers. The homeowner had no choice but to pay up. He would have been put into the hospital again as there is no way that he could have his case heard by one of the many excellent judges in the Court of Queen’s Bench.
When my wife filed for a divorce her lawyer was a former law partner of the lawyer I reported to the police and the judge who heard the case was also a former law partner.
I am disabled with a rare movement disorder that effects my muscles and I have a degenerated spine. I borrowed money for a lawyer and was railroaded to a pre-trial. My lawyer refused to contact my doctors. My lawyer was surprised to find that the divorce file was not in the family court registry, it was in the Queen’s Bench registry. It was the personal property of Justice Hrabinsky. My lawyer filed a pre-trial brief without letting me see it that contained old medical information. When my wife moved out she took all my personal papers including medical documents. He could have only obtained this information from my wife’s lawyer. I told this lawyer that I had a problem with a past employer and my wife’s lawyer claimed that I worked under the table for this employer. They were trying to discredit me by claiming my claimed income was low, not because I am disabled, but because I worked for cash and cheated on my income tax.
The court ignored a letter from my doctor that said that my attending the pre-trial would have a serious effect on my health. Justice Hrabinsky at the pre-trial told me to get a job and was prepared to put me and my disabled mother out on the street. I ended up in the hospital. When I searched for his name on the internet I found a detailed record of his years of stomping on the Charter Rights of people and jailing innocent people. The truth was on the internet detailing his behaviour for the world to see. He could not hide from the truth.
When I received the file from my lawyer he had made reference in his notes to a third Bencher with the Law Society. Lucky me, I had three benchers with the Saskatchewan Law Society overseeing my case. A friend hired another lawyer who made an application to the court to delay the trial date, I was being railroaded to a trial. This lawyer discovered my wife and obtained undertaking for documents. He withdrew before he obtained them. My legal bill was over $6000.00 and he did not file one document on my behalf and again this lawyer did not contact my doctors.
I attended court without a lawyer and ended up on the floor by the family court registry flopping around like a fish out of water. I received a letter from the court a few days later that said if I again decided not to attend in court on the next trial date the trial would proceed without me. A few days before the trial date I receiver a letter from my wife’s lawyer saying the trial had been postponed and based on this information I did not go to court. I then received a court order. The judge was my wife‘s former law partner for five years Justice Dovell. She is also the former law partner of the lawyer I reported to the police. The order again said that if I again failed to attend in court the trial would proceed without me. It also said that the next trial date was final and read like the court would not continue to put up with my not attending court.
I again searched the internet for justice Dovell. What I found sickened me. Not only were these judges destroying lives they were protecting people who stood by and did nothing about the rape and torture of two 8 year old girls for 43 months, between May 29th 1990 & January, 1994. There was a man speaking on behalf of the children. He was jailed and is to this day being persecuted. Justice Hrabinsky and Dovell have been stomping on the Charter Rights of innocent people with gag orders, sealing documents, secret courts, just like one would expect in the former USSR. He has a gag order that prevents him from speaking that clearly has only one purpose, hide the truth.
He is being discredited because of his way of proceeding is seen as being unacceptable, after over ten years of being persecuted it may not be acceptable, but it is understandable. For over ten years he has being telling the truth. He can not put his story on the internet as he has a court gag order crammed down his throat. His name is John Lucas. I read on the injusticebusters web site that Richard Klassen was at one time so distraught that he was going to drive his car into the front door of the police station. This would not be acceptable, but it would have been understandable. I am glad he did not do that, Mr Klassen exposed the people responsible for destroying his family in spite of the combined efforts by judges, lawyers and the government of Saskatchewan to hide the truth.
My friend has my power of attorney, this is because I can have life treating adverse reactions to small amounts of prescribed medications. I am unable to direct a doctor if I am hospitalised or taken to emergency. I live in a city that is know for its caring people who help the disabled. There is no other city in Canada that is known for its volunteers like Saskatoon is. I have caring medical professional help just a phone call away. I pay 4% of the cost of my medications. I have a friendly volunteer deliver a hot meal for myself and my mother, she is completely dependant on me for her care. If I end up in the hospital a health care professional checks on my mother and sees that she is cared for. For over 20 years I have managed to keep myself off welfare by taking odd jobs. A car accident left me unable to work for five years and I sold my house and used the money to live on. I lived on peanut butter sandwiches and mended my false teeth by using glue and a patch of cloth. Without the help of volunteers and having my medical needs taken care of I would have lost my independence years ago. I bought my house with the money I received from the court judgement and my mother paid one third of its cost. I found out the hard way that lonely medicated disabled men with assets that are paid for are easy pray for women.
My friend had my doctors write letters for the court and he attached them to his affidavit and filed them before the trial. I told him that he needed to help me to get out of the court if the judge started in on me again like Justice Hrabinsky did. Justice Dovell ignored my doctors letters and it was a repeat of the pre-trial. Without his help to get me into my wheelchair and out of the court and home I would have ended up back in the hospital.
My mother found me unconscious on the bathroom floor that night, I was laying in a pool of yellow slime that I had vomited up, I was unable to move my head, my neck muscles were seized from my shoulder to the base of my skull with my head twisted up and to the left, I could not straighten out my legs as my calf muscles would seize up, my left foot was twisted in at 90 degrees and 100mg of morphine was having little effect except to sicken and leave me nauseated. I was reduced to a barnyard animal. I was unable to get into my wheelchair. I was unable to find my shoe phone and I knocked my computer key board on the floor and I sent an email for help. There was no point in my going to the hospital, there is no cure for Dystonia, all they could do would be to give me an injection of morphine and send me home again. I needed food placed in the bottom of the fridge for my mother where I could reach it and the telephone on the floor and a mattress on the living room floor. I crawled for three days in pain unable to get into my wheelchair or eat and vomiting up a yellow slime.
I read a speech by Senator Anne C. Cools about the “suicide of a 34 year old man from British Columbia named Darrin Bruce White. He had been, as had his ex-wife, a railroad locomotive engineer. He was on disability with a disposable income of about $1,000 per month. On March 1, 2000, the court ordered him to pay his ex-wife a total of $2, 071 per month, being $1,07l in child support plus $1,000.00 for spousal support for herself, with the first payment due immediately. He was ordered to pay twice his real income on disability. He disappeared a few days later and was found dead in the woods shortly thereafter. He had hanged himself. --- This man’s feelings, like many men’s feelings, were not received by the system, as money they do not have is extracted and gouged out of them. His voice is silent.” I came very close to being just another dead disabled victim of injustice that night on the bathroom floor. My voice is not silent.
My friend wrote a letter to Justice Dovell, I was very concerned when he did this as I knew what she was capable of. Her order was expected, she ordered me to continue making payments on my camping trailer until spring and then it was to be sold and half of the money given to my wife, if not for a registered caveat protecting my mothers right to live in her house it would have been ordered sold and my mother and I would have been out on the street. She ordered my house to be listed for sale within one month of the passing of my mother. She went on at great length how I did not bother to appear for court and made reference to the letter from the court saying that the trial would proceed if I failed to attend. She included the court order and made it sound like some other judge had ordered this as I had failed to attend at trial. She made no mention that she was the judge that made the order or that I did not attend because I was told the trial was postponed by her former law partner. She dismissed my doctors letters as hearsay. She went on about how I worked for cash under the table and took every opportunity to discredit me. There was not one word about my being in a wheelchair, disabled or the reasons for my disability that my doctors listed in their letters.
I started being harassed by the sheriff shortly after court. There was nothing in the order that I was required to pay until the spring when the trailer was ordered sold. This left me on the floor again. My friend arranged for a bank loan and he is making the monthly payments. He hired another lawyer paying $6000.00 and the lawyer got the sheriff off my back and filed an appeal. This lawyer has again failed to contact my doctors. This is understandable because if he proceeds with the appeal he will beaten him into the ground, he has said that he does not want Justice Dovell after him.
I do not think it fair to the owner of an internet site to include names in my posts but there is nothing that I could say about Justice Hrabinsky or Madam Justice Dovell that has not already been said. Nothing that I could say could be any worse then what is detailed about them on the internet. They are a disgrace to their profession and not only have they disgraced themselves and the court they drag the names of honest honourable lawyers and judges through the muck with them. I have included the names on my blog as there is one thing that they will never stop me from doing, telling the truth.
Red Deer could not come close to the corruption within the administration of justice in Saskatchewan. There are many people who have had their lives destroyed in Saskatchewan by corruption, dishonest lawyers and judges. I picketed the Court of Queen’s Bench the winter before last, once I got past the first hour of feeling like a goof and people stopped to talk and ask questions it became a lot easer. Justice Baynton said about Richard Klassen picketing the court that it was not wise for him to be picketing. I agree with him, not only does it show a deserving disrespect for Justice Hrabinsky’s and Dovell’s court, it is disrespectful of Justice Baynton’s court. If Justice Baynton accepts the international disgrace of his court detailed on the internet as a result of the actions of Justice Hrabinsky and Dovell then he is deserving of any disrespect for his court without my help.
My doctors have been asking for a letter from a lawyer directing them about what to include in a legal medical report. They now know the reason that a lawyer has not contacted them for over three years. They also know that I can be left crawling on the floor in pain with no way to defend myself and hospitalised again without their help. My family doctor has told my friend that I have a rare movement disorder and it is unlikely that there is anyone else in Saskatoon with a similar movement disorder or a doctor qualified to write the medical report. He said that it is difficult to have the health care pay for an out of province doctor qualified to write a report. I have been diagnosed with a movement disorder that is likely Torsion Dystonia and because it is rare the only doctor who could properly diagnose the disorder would be in the USA or Vancouver.
Justice Hrabinsky and Dovell have the power to obscure and obfuscate the truth. They have the power to dismiss my doctors letters, fabricate court orders and put me into the hospital. The one thing they can not do is hide from the truth. If this Albert Redecop and judge Crowe have done as you say then write up the truth, support it with documents and evidence and post it on the internet with your name on it. Justice Hrabinsky and Dovell have a 10 year history of hiding the truth that is detailed on the internet. Justice Dovell was appointed to the bench after people started serving Statements of Claim in regards to the Satanic child abuse cases. Her appointment to the bench is an affront to the ancient standard of honour, integrity and ethics. Her order that a conversation between a police officer and a prosecutor was subject to client lawyer privilege was a continuation of hide the truth. It was unlikely that any of the cases would make it to trial and with the sealing of documents, secret court orders, publication bans and gag orders the truth would be hidden forever. Their tunnel vision view prevented them from seeing the truth on the internet. The Baynton Judgement did not only uncovered the truth, it clearly showed the way of exposing injustice and corruption is not in a court room, it is posting the truth on the internet.
To my knowledge only one member of the legal community in Saskatoon has spoken out, he is a law professor, he said about a judgement by Justice Dovell that it was “unusual”. That was the understatement of the year. Canadians need a timely, credible and affordable way to expose these judges, lawyers and end the process of political patronage appointments to the bench.
If there was a credibly body to take complaints about Justice Hrabinsky and Dovell they would have been shown the door years ago and they would not have been allowed to abuse their power and continue to destroy lives. The Canadian Justice Review Board has asked Sheila Fraser, Auditor General of Canada to take a hard look at how the Canadian Judicial Counsel conducts its business. I have a complaint about Justice Paul Hrabinsky and Madam Justice Dovell and like so many other Canadians I have found out they are the untouchable elite. A suggestion to take my complaint to the Canadian Judicial Counsel is an insult as is a suggestion to take a complaint to the Law Society.
The Canadian Justice Review Board’s letter to Sheila Fraser could be the start of a timely and affordable way for Canadians to have corrupt judges removed from the bench. Judges hearing complaints about judges and lawyers hearing complaints about lawyers is no different than gangsters hearing complaints about gangsters. Until there is a credible way for Canadians to have their complaints heard about corrupt judges and lawyers the best way to proceed is by posting the truth on the internet. The Red Deer justice system can not possibly be worse then the detailed atrocities of corruption within the administration of justice in Saskatchewan and Saskatoon. Your post about justice Crowe may be true but without your name on your post it has no credibility. With any luck the Canadian Justice Review Board and Sheila Fraser, Auditor General of Canada will expose the Canadian Judicial Counsel for what it is, useless.
You are not dealing with overly intelligent people. They openly abuse their power in a complete vacuum of any accountability. This has been shown to be true, not one of the people found to be responsible for destroying Richard Klassen’s family are being held accountable. You are dealing with grade six bullies who are accountable to no one.
The injusticebusters web site details the injustice of wrongful convictions, Sheila Steele and Richard Klassen have shown the way, there are now web and blog pages detailing injustice and corruption from Newfoundland to Vancouver island. The power of stating the truth and putting a signature on it on the web can be seen in Justice Baynton’s Judgement. They can not hide from the truth.
James Hunter
Tuesday, March 08, 2005
The last will and testament of A.T. Renouf
The following is the last will and testament of A.T. Renouf. He joined the growing list of Canadian victims of injustice in Canada who believe that the only solution is suicide and that some how the publication of his last will and testament will make a difference. There is not a Canadian in this country that would not have helped Mr Renouf. If you find yourself in this situation for any reason talk to someone. You are not alone, join the thousands of Canadians just like you who are fighting injustice in Canada. Do it before the anger and depression results in destructive behaviour. Use that last bit of gas in your car and put it to good use, drive yourself to emergency, you will not have to explain what has been done to you, they have seen it many times and they can help, your voice is needed.
To Whom It May Concern
Last friday (13-October) my bank account was garnisheed. I was left with a total of $00.43 in the bank.
At this time I have rent and bill's to pay which would come to somewhere approaching $1500.00 to $1800.00.
Since my last pay was also direct deposited on friday I now have no way of supporting myself. I have no money for food or for gas for my car to enable me to work. My employer also tells me that they will only pay me by direct deposit. I therefore no longer have a job, since the money would not reach me.
I have tried talking to the Family Support people at 1916 Dundas St. E. their answer was:-" we have a court order." repeated several times.
I have tried talking to the welfare people in Markham. Since I earned over $520.00 last month I am not eligible for assistance.
I have had no contact with my daughter in approx. 4 year's. I do not even know if she is alive and well. I have tried to keep her informed of my current telephone number but she has never bothered to call.
I have no family and no friend's, very little food, no viable job and very poor future prospects. I have therefore decided that there is no further point in continuing my life. It is my intention to drive to a secluded area, near my home, feed the car exhaust into the car, take some sleeping pills and use the remaining gas in the car to end my life.
I would have prefered to die with more dignity.
It is my last will and testament that this letter be published for all to see and read.
Signed
A.T. Renouf
To Whom It May Concern
Last friday (13-October) my bank account was garnisheed. I was left with a total of $00.43 in the bank.
At this time I have rent and bill's to pay which would come to somewhere approaching $1500.00 to $1800.00.
Since my last pay was also direct deposited on friday I now have no way of supporting myself. I have no money for food or for gas for my car to enable me to work. My employer also tells me that they will only pay me by direct deposit. I therefore no longer have a job, since the money would not reach me.
I have tried talking to the Family Support people at 1916 Dundas St. E. their answer was:-" we have a court order." repeated several times.
I have tried talking to the welfare people in Markham. Since I earned over $520.00 last month I am not eligible for assistance.
I have had no contact with my daughter in approx. 4 year's. I do not even know if she is alive and well. I have tried to keep her informed of my current telephone number but she has never bothered to call.
I have no family and no friend's, very little food, no viable job and very poor future prospects. I have therefore decided that there is no further point in continuing my life. It is my intention to drive to a secluded area, near my home, feed the car exhaust into the car, take some sleeping pills and use the remaining gas in the car to end my life.
I would have prefered to die with more dignity.
It is my last will and testament that this letter be published for all to see and read.
Signed
A.T. Renouf
Wednesday, February 23, 2005
What to do?
All of the people in Saskatchewan who have had their lives destroyed by corruption need to get together with family and friends and protest in Saskatoon this spring while the Milgaard Inquiry is proceeding. A peaceful protest in the park across the street from the court house and demand justice. Obtaining justice in Saskatchewan is not possible, this has been detailed for years on the internet many time over. Demand action by the federal government and march from the park to our federal MP’s offices and let them know we will be back the next election if they continue to do nothing. The corruption in Saskatchewan is to entrenched in the courts, legal community and government. There will not be any action taken within Saskatchewan, we could protest until the cows come home and nothing would change. Pick a date.
Wednesday, February 16, 2005
You are in a lot of trouble boy
Years ago a lawyer told me that a judge in Saskatchewan who was in the news for removing door knobs from the court house in Prince Albert had nothing to do with the door knobs, he told me that it was because the judge was “not toeing the line”. I dismissed this, who would believe that a justice of The Court of Queen’s Bench in Saskatchewan had to “toe the line”. I was wrong to dismiss what this lawyer said, not only do the judges have to “toe the line”, if they, or anyone else including lawyers, newspaper editors and writers or ordinary citizens say anything publicly about injustice in Saskatchewan, they will be pounced on by Saskatchewan Justice, and the Saskatchewan Law Society.
I believe that injustice in the smaller provinces in Canada like Saskatchewan and Newfoundland has resulted in a far greater problem then in the larger populated provinces. Saskatchewan has the added disadvantage of having with the exception of a few years, the same political party in power and for years one newspaper with different names. Canada as a whole has this same weakness of having the same political party in power. Canadians keep electing the same politicians and they continue to ignore the greatest injustice in Canada, a failed justice system. This needs to be an election issue in Canada, not the issues created by politicians just before an election.
The college of law in Saskatchewan has been dispensing a steady yearly supply of incompetent lawyers year after year. This is a documented fact, not only in Saskatchewan, it is all across Canada. Judges put up with them day after day. The result is a Justice of the Court of Appeal in Saskatchewan yelling at one of these incompetence fools, ”sit down and shut up!”. These incompetent fools are being appointed to the bench.
It was not law schools that shaped Canada’s past top judges, it was a volunteer army in two world wars, it was sound judgements that resulted in their being placed on a pinnacle. The young solders did not fight for our future Constitution, Charter Rights or a Maple Leaf Flag, they fought to protect what we already had, Freedom and the Red Ensign. Freedom has been lost in Canada to a morass of case law that is cloaked in the language of law after the signing of the Constitution. This case law is what governs Canadians, not the elected law makers or the Constitution and Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This case law is not the result of judicial error, it is the result of judicial incompetence, political patronage, bias, corruption and in Saskatchewan racism and radical religious views.
Canadians did not only lose brave volunteer solders in a two day battle for our Freedoms at Vimy Ridge, future generations of great Canadian leaders died with them. Compare the written judgements of distinguished Canadian war Veterans federally appointed to the bench to the written judgements of political hacks now being appointed. Compare the distinguished political carers of Veterans to the Canadian who rode a motorcycle with a Nazi Swastika on his helmet in Montreal during the last great war.
The Red Ensign was not only draped over the coffins of our protectors of Freedom, for over forty years it has been draped over the Human Rights of Canadians. There is a growing number of Canadians who are raising and displaying the Red Ensign in protest and as a sign of unity for Freedom, I am one of them.
I received responses to my pleads for help from pass the buck, toe the party line politicians. They stand behind the autonomy of the court system and claim an inability to intervene. This is a sad system we have when elected officials can shrug their shoulders and wash their hands of the plight of common citizens. The corruption and decay characterizing the Saskatchewan justice system (from the police to the judges) has been clearly revealed during the last fifteen years. It is such a sad state of affairs it makes one ashamed to be a part of this province. The police are corrupt, the prosecutors and judges operate in a state of unaccountable vacuum, and the lawyers practise within an old-boys network that makes sure their respective palms are well greased. The crime rates in Saskatoon and Regina are the highest in Canada. These musings are not speculation. Everyone alive in this province knows it. Read the paper. Watch the news. The people of Saskatchewan live in a state that is closer in comparison to the former U.S.S.R. than it is to a supposedly respected nation.
The Attorney General of Saskatchewan, Frank Quennell, had the ability to begin a restoration of public confidence in the justice system by coming clean and admitting the grave mistakes it made with Klassen, John Lucas and his wife, et al. But no, he continues to be dragged, kicking and screaming to the truth. He will appeal and feed the cancer rather than remove it. Instead of beginning a healing process he steadfastly stands in protection of the disease. This is one of the high profile travesties. Countless other low profile legal abominations occur in this province every day.
I was referred to a number of federal administrative tribunals and agencies, rights tribunals, regulatory agencies, government agencies and others with court-like powers that had no power to enforce their own decisions. They were managed by judicial incompetence, political patronage, bias, corruption and in Saskatchewan racism and radical religious views. I was right back where I started.
I was looking for justice, all I found was years of injustice and government corruption that was spreading like a cancer across Canada. I changed my internet search words from injustice, corruption and the like as I could not read another horror story posted by a fellow Canadian. I dredged getting another email from a Canadian desperate for help. I had no way to help them.
The Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin, Chief Justice of Canada is exploiting the trust of Canadians. She is singing the praises of the Canadian Justice System and the importance of an independent judiciary, she does this knowing that what she is saying is not true. There is only one country that has independent judges, they are U.S. Federal Administrative Law Judges. There is not a competent lawyer or judge in Canada that does not know this.
It is not Canadians who have the protection of their Constitution, it is federal appointed judges, they protect this power and money with the Judges Act and by using fear and intimidation in a manner similar to the gangsters of the twenties. Judges who protect the Charter Rights of Canadians are dragged before the Judicial Counsel, lawyers who speak out about our inept administration of justice are dragged before the Law Societies. The law societies are being used to intimidate and silence lawyers.
I discovered that there were many people in Canada who are in a position to make changes, they are speaking out for Canadians. They are not being supported by Canadians mainly because Canadians do not know about them. We hear about the judges dragged before the Judicial Counsel and lawyers dragged before the Law Societies but the news media pays little attention to anything that does not sell newspapers. I am a ex disabled truck driver with a limited education and I can not do anything about what has happened to me and a disabled homeowner in Saskatoon.
I like a lot of other Canadians have found out that I have no Charter Rights. Canadians find this out in a court or before some government administrative tribunal with court-like powers. We did not gain with the signing of the Constitution Act in 1982, we lost our Freedom. I not only found out I have no Charter Rights, I never had them. We have our blog and web pages, it is like a large fragmented hard drive. We could learn a thing or two from the people of the Ukraine who this past Christmas united by the thousands in a peaceful protest for Freedom. Canadians need to unite against government corruption, this corruption is being protected by the Constitution, Judges Act and the Canadian Judicial Council.
About two years ago I pleaded for help on the internet. I was sure that all I had to do was let my fellow Canadians know what had been done to two disabled men in Saskatoon and Canadians would come to our aid like the cavalry in an old western movie. I discovered that I did not live in the times of the old west, I lived in the times of southern US states and “you are in a lot of trouble boy”.
We are ruled by a corrupt judicial establishment. Is anyone else interested in discussing ways to unite and support the many Canadian judges, lawyers, politicians, doctors, Senators, law professors, writers, editors, and other Canadians who are fighting for our Freedoms. Drowning all the politicians and lawyers at birth is not going to work.
James Hunter
I believe that injustice in the smaller provinces in Canada like Saskatchewan and Newfoundland has resulted in a far greater problem then in the larger populated provinces. Saskatchewan has the added disadvantage of having with the exception of a few years, the same political party in power and for years one newspaper with different names. Canada as a whole has this same weakness of having the same political party in power. Canadians keep electing the same politicians and they continue to ignore the greatest injustice in Canada, a failed justice system. This needs to be an election issue in Canada, not the issues created by politicians just before an election.
The college of law in Saskatchewan has been dispensing a steady yearly supply of incompetent lawyers year after year. This is a documented fact, not only in Saskatchewan, it is all across Canada. Judges put up with them day after day. The result is a Justice of the Court of Appeal in Saskatchewan yelling at one of these incompetence fools, ”sit down and shut up!”. These incompetent fools are being appointed to the bench.
It was not law schools that shaped Canada’s past top judges, it was a volunteer army in two world wars, it was sound judgements that resulted in their being placed on a pinnacle. The young solders did not fight for our future Constitution, Charter Rights or a Maple Leaf Flag, they fought to protect what we already had, Freedom and the Red Ensign. Freedom has been lost in Canada to a morass of case law that is cloaked in the language of law after the signing of the Constitution. This case law is what governs Canadians, not the elected law makers or the Constitution and Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This case law is not the result of judicial error, it is the result of judicial incompetence, political patronage, bias, corruption and in Saskatchewan racism and radical religious views.
Canadians did not only lose brave volunteer solders in a two day battle for our Freedoms at Vimy Ridge, future generations of great Canadian leaders died with them. Compare the written judgements of distinguished Canadian war Veterans federally appointed to the bench to the written judgements of political hacks now being appointed. Compare the distinguished political carers of Veterans to the Canadian who rode a motorcycle with a Nazi Swastika on his helmet in Montreal during the last great war.
The Red Ensign was not only draped over the coffins of our protectors of Freedom, for over forty years it has been draped over the Human Rights of Canadians. There is a growing number of Canadians who are raising and displaying the Red Ensign in protest and as a sign of unity for Freedom, I am one of them.
I received responses to my pleads for help from pass the buck, toe the party line politicians. They stand behind the autonomy of the court system and claim an inability to intervene. This is a sad system we have when elected officials can shrug their shoulders and wash their hands of the plight of common citizens. The corruption and decay characterizing the Saskatchewan justice system (from the police to the judges) has been clearly revealed during the last fifteen years. It is such a sad state of affairs it makes one ashamed to be a part of this province. The police are corrupt, the prosecutors and judges operate in a state of unaccountable vacuum, and the lawyers practise within an old-boys network that makes sure their respective palms are well greased. The crime rates in Saskatoon and Regina are the highest in Canada. These musings are not speculation. Everyone alive in this province knows it. Read the paper. Watch the news. The people of Saskatchewan live in a state that is closer in comparison to the former U.S.S.R. than it is to a supposedly respected nation.
The Attorney General of Saskatchewan, Frank Quennell, had the ability to begin a restoration of public confidence in the justice system by coming clean and admitting the grave mistakes it made with Klassen, John Lucas and his wife, et al. But no, he continues to be dragged, kicking and screaming to the truth. He will appeal and feed the cancer rather than remove it. Instead of beginning a healing process he steadfastly stands in protection of the disease. This is one of the high profile travesties. Countless other low profile legal abominations occur in this province every day.
I was referred to a number of federal administrative tribunals and agencies, rights tribunals, regulatory agencies, government agencies and others with court-like powers that had no power to enforce their own decisions. They were managed by judicial incompetence, political patronage, bias, corruption and in Saskatchewan racism and radical religious views. I was right back where I started.
I was looking for justice, all I found was years of injustice and government corruption that was spreading like a cancer across Canada. I changed my internet search words from injustice, corruption and the like as I could not read another horror story posted by a fellow Canadian. I dredged getting another email from a Canadian desperate for help. I had no way to help them.
The Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin, Chief Justice of Canada is exploiting the trust of Canadians. She is singing the praises of the Canadian Justice System and the importance of an independent judiciary, she does this knowing that what she is saying is not true. There is only one country that has independent judges, they are U.S. Federal Administrative Law Judges. There is not a competent lawyer or judge in Canada that does not know this.
It is not Canadians who have the protection of their Constitution, it is federal appointed judges, they protect this power and money with the Judges Act and by using fear and intimidation in a manner similar to the gangsters of the twenties. Judges who protect the Charter Rights of Canadians are dragged before the Judicial Counsel, lawyers who speak out about our inept administration of justice are dragged before the Law Societies. The law societies are being used to intimidate and silence lawyers.
I discovered that there were many people in Canada who are in a position to make changes, they are speaking out for Canadians. They are not being supported by Canadians mainly because Canadians do not know about them. We hear about the judges dragged before the Judicial Counsel and lawyers dragged before the Law Societies but the news media pays little attention to anything that does not sell newspapers. I am a ex disabled truck driver with a limited education and I can not do anything about what has happened to me and a disabled homeowner in Saskatoon.
I like a lot of other Canadians have found out that I have no Charter Rights. Canadians find this out in a court or before some government administrative tribunal with court-like powers. We did not gain with the signing of the Constitution Act in 1982, we lost our Freedom. I not only found out I have no Charter Rights, I never had them. We have our blog and web pages, it is like a large fragmented hard drive. We could learn a thing or two from the people of the Ukraine who this past Christmas united by the thousands in a peaceful protest for Freedom. Canadians need to unite against government corruption, this corruption is being protected by the Constitution, Judges Act and the Canadian Judicial Council.
About two years ago I pleaded for help on the internet. I was sure that all I had to do was let my fellow Canadians know what had been done to two disabled men in Saskatoon and Canadians would come to our aid like the cavalry in an old western movie. I discovered that I did not live in the times of the old west, I lived in the times of southern US states and “you are in a lot of trouble boy”.
We are ruled by a corrupt judicial establishment. Is anyone else interested in discussing ways to unite and support the many Canadian judges, lawyers, politicians, doctors, Senators, law professors, writers, editors, and other Canadians who are fighting for our Freedoms. Drowning all the politicians and lawyers at birth is not going to work.
James Hunter
Tuesday, February 08, 2005
The Canadian Justice Review Board - PRESS RELEASE
Visit: www.CanadianJusticeReviewBoard.ca
PRESS RELEASE
February 4, 2005
After reviewing the Canadian Judicial Council (CJC) annual report, The Canadian Justice Review Board (CJRB) has sent a letter to Sheila Fraser, Auditor General of Canada. In the letter, the CJRB suggests that the Auditor General take a hard look at how the CJC conducts its business. The annual report from the CJC is normally released in August, but did not surface this year it until December 2004. Unlike the standard professional format employed over the past 30-years, the informal 2003-2004 publication abounds with abstract photography but lacks substance, says the CJRB. In particular, this year’s report omits any financial statement.
In addition to bringing the omission of a financial statement to the attention of the Auditor General, the CJRB letter includes exhibits that suggests that CJC Executive Director Norman Sabourin does not follow the rules. Written into its mandate, the CJC states that even if a complaint is without foundation, so long as it is in writing and names a specific judge the Council will investigate the matter. Therefore Mr. Sabourin’s notion that a complaint is “an abuse of the complaints process” is untenable. More importantly, by failing to record a complaint as such, Mr. Sabourin can skew the statistics and grossly overstate the level of public satisfaction with our judiciary.
Since the CJC consists of many of the same people as in the Superior Court Judges Association (comprised of judges of the superior court), current CJRB chairman David Kahn says “ If the superior court rules in favour of Justice Cosgrove (and the Association) and finds that the CJC stifles judicial independence with its doctrine of conformity to political correctness or if it finds that the CJC cannot constitutionally investigate judges, it would logically suggest that the CJC has become redundant. Inevitably, the suspicion arises that the CJC is manoeuvring to stealthily carve out some sort of new mandate for itself”.
In September 2003, the CJRB expressed public concern that the CJC is far too secretive. "The judges are paid out of the public purse and they are performing a public function in a public place. Given those things, people have a right to know what is going on within the judiciary. One thing that we think is important is to let judges and other people in the judicial system know that they are being looked at and scrutinized " said then-CJRB chairman and UWO law professor Robert Martin.
The full text of the Canadian Justice Review Board letter to Sheila Fraser dated February 1, 2005 is available in pdf format at: http://www.canadianjusticereviewboard.ca/Auditor%20General%20Sheila%20Fraser.pdf
The exhibits ‘A’ thru ‘G’ to the letter are available in pdf format
For further information contact:
David A. Kahn (chairman) davidakahn@CanadianJusticeReviewCouncil.ca
Lynne Cohen (vice-chairman) lynnecohen@CanadianJusticeReviewCouncil.ca
Gwen Landolt (secretary treasurer) gwen@CanadianJusticeReviewCouncil.ca
Robert Martin (past chairman) rm@CanadianJusticeReviewCouncil.ca
PRESS RELEASE
February 4, 2005
After reviewing the Canadian Judicial Council (CJC) annual report, The Canadian Justice Review Board (CJRB) has sent a letter to Sheila Fraser, Auditor General of Canada. In the letter, the CJRB suggests that the Auditor General take a hard look at how the CJC conducts its business. The annual report from the CJC is normally released in August, but did not surface this year it until December 2004. Unlike the standard professional format employed over the past 30-years, the informal 2003-2004 publication abounds with abstract photography but lacks substance, says the CJRB. In particular, this year’s report omits any financial statement.
In addition to bringing the omission of a financial statement to the attention of the Auditor General, the CJRB letter includes exhibits that suggests that CJC Executive Director Norman Sabourin does not follow the rules. Written into its mandate, the CJC states that even if a complaint is without foundation, so long as it is in writing and names a specific judge the Council will investigate the matter. Therefore Mr. Sabourin’s notion that a complaint is “an abuse of the complaints process” is untenable. More importantly, by failing to record a complaint as such, Mr. Sabourin can skew the statistics and grossly overstate the level of public satisfaction with our judiciary.
Since the CJC consists of many of the same people as in the Superior Court Judges Association (comprised of judges of the superior court), current CJRB chairman David Kahn says “ If the superior court rules in favour of Justice Cosgrove (and the Association) and finds that the CJC stifles judicial independence with its doctrine of conformity to political correctness or if it finds that the CJC cannot constitutionally investigate judges, it would logically suggest that the CJC has become redundant. Inevitably, the suspicion arises that the CJC is manoeuvring to stealthily carve out some sort of new mandate for itself”.
In September 2003, the CJRB expressed public concern that the CJC is far too secretive. "The judges are paid out of the public purse and they are performing a public function in a public place. Given those things, people have a right to know what is going on within the judiciary. One thing that we think is important is to let judges and other people in the judicial system know that they are being looked at and scrutinized " said then-CJRB chairman and UWO law professor Robert Martin.
The full text of the Canadian Justice Review Board letter to Sheila Fraser dated February 1, 2005 is available in pdf format at: http://www.canadianjusticereviewboard.ca/Auditor%20General%20Sheila%20Fraser.pdf
The exhibits ‘A’ thru ‘G’ to the letter are available in pdf format
For further information contact:
David A. Kahn (chairman) davidakahn@CanadianJusticeReviewCouncil.ca
Lynne Cohen (vice-chairman) lynnecohen@CanadianJusticeReviewCouncil.ca
Gwen Landolt (secretary treasurer) gwen@CanadianJusticeReviewCouncil.ca
Robert Martin (past chairman) rm@CanadianJusticeReviewCouncil.ca
Monday, February 07, 2005
Michell's child is apprehended.
This is Michell and Kathleen Ross's post to the injusticerbustersblog.
Injustice has been done here in BC. On Feb 3rd 2005 michell mimi ross was set up by the deparment of social services . they told her they were pickin her up for a metting and 2 hrs later 2 cops and a bodygurad and the worker showed up to take they baby. they came and took her less then one month son from her claimin her sisters house kathleen Ross is a unsafe house to be in .They told her she is not allowed to live with her sister but could vist. now they sayin she not allowed to vist. she goes to court on this thurs feb 10/005. she has seen her child one since they took him and gets to see him again on monday. this is injustice and has to be stopped. we have pictures of them takin the baby if anyone wants them please feel free to email us at kathyross_155@hotmail.com or mishka43@hotmail.com. any help would be apperiated. thanks michell and kathleen ross
Injustice has been done here in BC. On Feb 3rd 2005 michell mimi ross was set up by the deparment of social services . they told her they were pickin her up for a metting and 2 hrs later 2 cops and a bodygurad and the worker showed up to take they baby. they came and took her less then one month son from her claimin her sisters house kathleen Ross is a unsafe house to be in .They told her she is not allowed to live with her sister but could vist. now they sayin she not allowed to vist. she goes to court on this thurs feb 10/005. she has seen her child one since they took him and gets to see him again on monday. this is injustice and has to be stopped. we have pictures of them takin the baby if anyone wants them please feel free to email us at kathyross_155@hotmail.com or mishka43@hotmail.com. any help would be apperiated. thanks michell and kathleen ross
Friday, February 04, 2005
Honourable Senator Anne C. Cools Act to amend the Criminal Code
This is the Honourable Senator Anne C. Cools Act to amend the Criminal Code (abuse of process). If this Act would have become law in Canada Madam Justice Dovell, Audrey Brent and Nicholas Stooshinoff would be in jail where they belong. They are above the law, they have the Canadian Judicial Council, Justice critic Don Morgan, Brent Gough and the Law Society of Saskatchewan protecting their illegal acts.
NOW, THEREFORE, Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of Canada, enacts as follows:
1. The Criminal Code is amended by adding immediately after section 134 the following:
135. (1) Every person who, while acting or purporting to act as counsel in respect of any anticipated, current or completed judicial proceedings, makes any public statement of facts in relation to the judicial proceedings out of the presence of the tribunal or body authorized by law to conduct the proceedings
(a) knowing that some or all of the facts asserted in the statement are not true,
(b) having no reasonable grounds for believing that the facts asserted in the statement are true, or
(c) having failed to take reasonable measures before making the statement to ascertain the truth of the facts asserted in the statement,
is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.
(2) For the purpose of subsection (1), a statement of facts in relation to the judicial proceedings includes a reading from or an express reference to documents
(a) deposited or filed with or intended to be deposited or filed with the tribunal or body authorized by law to conduct the proceedings, or
(b) deposited or filed in any other judicial proceedings.
135.1 (1) Every person is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years who, as counsel in any judicial proceedings, institutes or prosecutes proceedings that he or she knows are brought primarily for the purpose of intimidating or injuring another person.
(2) Every person is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years who, as counsel in any judicial proceedings,
(a) wilfully deceives or knowingly participates in deceiving the tribunal or other body legally authorized to conduct the proceedings, or
(b) wilfully presents or knowingly relies upon a false, deceptive, exaggerated or inflammatory document, whether or not under oath.
The Honourable Senator Anne C. Cools - Home Page
http://sen.parl.gc.ca/acools/
NOW, THEREFORE, Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of Canada, enacts as follows:
1. The Criminal Code is amended by adding immediately after section 134 the following:
135. (1) Every person who, while acting or purporting to act as counsel in respect of any anticipated, current or completed judicial proceedings, makes any public statement of facts in relation to the judicial proceedings out of the presence of the tribunal or body authorized by law to conduct the proceedings
(a) knowing that some or all of the facts asserted in the statement are not true,
(b) having no reasonable grounds for believing that the facts asserted in the statement are true, or
(c) having failed to take reasonable measures before making the statement to ascertain the truth of the facts asserted in the statement,
is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.
(2) For the purpose of subsection (1), a statement of facts in relation to the judicial proceedings includes a reading from or an express reference to documents
(a) deposited or filed with or intended to be deposited or filed with the tribunal or body authorized by law to conduct the proceedings, or
(b) deposited or filed in any other judicial proceedings.
135.1 (1) Every person is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years who, as counsel in any judicial proceedings, institutes or prosecutes proceedings that he or she knows are brought primarily for the purpose of intimidating or injuring another person.
(2) Every person is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years who, as counsel in any judicial proceedings,
(a) wilfully deceives or knowingly participates in deceiving the tribunal or other body legally authorized to conduct the proceedings, or
(b) wilfully presents or knowingly relies upon a false, deceptive, exaggerated or inflammatory document, whether or not under oath.
The Honourable Senator Anne C. Cools - Home Page
http://sen.parl.gc.ca/acools/
Tuesday, February 01, 2005
Windsor Plywood Builders Lien Scam Documents
Windsor Plywood Builders Lien Scam Documents.
Sorry, I had to move this post as it did not post properly. Click the above link please.
This post has the first and second Statements as to Documents and the 8 false charge invoices. You can also find them on the index page listed separately.
Sorry, I had to move this post as it did not post properly. Click the above link please.
This post has the first and second Statements as to Documents and the 8 false charge invoices. You can also find them on the index page listed separately.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)