There is a rotten stink in Saskatoon coming from the south west. Many people in Saskatchewan will remember this stink. The smell is similar to the smell that was coming from the Saskatoon Police Service for over four years and continued on at the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal and Supreme Court of Canada for another 15 years.
In the late eighties a small group of religious nut cases in Saskatoon created a sick story of sex with children. Three Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder children were in a special foster home for child victims of ritual abuse in Saskatoon. Their parents and a war hero were jailed in Saskatchewan’s first ritual satanic child abuse case. Gag and seal was the order of the day in Saskatchewan courts. People who tried to help the children were arrested and charged with criminal offences. This was the only way that the administration of justice could keep the public from finding out what was happening in the courts and the foster home.
The rule of law became, rule by law. The abuse of process could have ended as quickly as it started if someone within Saskatchewan Justice or the Supreme Court of Canada did what they get paid to do. Protect the public and the children.
The rotten stink will never go away in Saskatoon. You can smell it when walking past Justice Paul Hrabinsky’s Court of Queens Bench and Brian Dueck’s Saskatoon Police Service.
The rotten stink is coming from Calgary, Alberta this time.
John Kelly from Calgary has a web site that reminds me of injusticebusters.com. The RCMP have charged Mr Kelly under the criminal code with libel and defamation. This reminds me of R v Lucas in Saskatoon.
The RCMP are saying that the charges are very rare. That’s true. The past cases that I know of involved corrupt cops and justice officials using the criminal code to protect corrupt judges, lawyers and cops.
The police will talk up how rare the charges are in a attempt to deceive the public into believing that the charges are very serious and not a run of the mill civil case. What Mr Kelly has been saying he has been saying for years. Why were civil proceedings not commenced years ago?
Civil proceeding are public. Criminal proceedings are controlled by the police and the Crown. The abuse of power has been well documented in past cases in Saskatoon. Add a few corrupt cops, lawyers and judges and you end up with a corrupt police service and administration of justice. The Crown will delay, withhold documents and do everything within its power to increase the defendants legal costs.
Some people are saying that this will be a good thing. The case could end up in the Supreme Court and these unjust laws will be removed from the criminal code. The Supreme Court of Canada is not interested in protecting the public from corrupt officers of the court. Look at the past cases, the court is only interested in protecting the publics image of the court. The result is a public that hold its nose when walking past a police station or court house.
It will not be the Supreme Court of Canada that ends the persecution of innocent people by corrupt court proceeding in Canada. This will only end when honest cops, lawyers and judges know they will have the support of the general public when they speak out about the corruption within our rotting administration of justice. End the silence.
John Kelly has a web site here: http://www.rottenapples.info/
Other sites: Police lay charges of libel, obstruction against Calgary website operator: http://hostjury.com/blog/view/270/police-lay-charges-of-libel-obstruction-against-calgary-website-operator
Friday, October 08, 2010
John Kelly
Friday, January 08, 2010
The Foster Care Council of Canada Message Board
To any current or former foster kids.
A Government is trying to say that kids in and/or from foster care are so concerned about their privacy that they would not want to give their addresses to a class action lawyer who would fight for them in court for abuse or damages suffered while in foster care.
The Government appears to be hiding behind "confidentiality laws" and we need as many former foster kids to say that if they had the chance they would give their address and personal contact information to a class action lawyer no problem and that they would easily waive their "right to confidentiality".
Anyone interested in helping this Alberta Lawyer Robert P. Lee who has been trying to fight for legal action on behalf of foster kids in a class action for over 400 foster kids etc. can e-mail me and tell me if you would be willing to swear an affidavit to that effect to support our brothers and sisters in their possible claim against the government.
If you have any questions or would like to provide you name in support for legal action on behalf of foster kids in a class action.
Contact: John Dunn
Sign in, send him a PM, or email.
http://fostercare.proboards.com/index.cgi
Lawyers Rights Watch Canada: ROBERT P. LEE
ROBERT P. LEE, A MEMBER OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA, EDMONTON
2009-07-06
Re: IN THE MATTER OF A HEARING REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF ROBERT P. LEE, A MEMBER OF THE LAW COCIETY OF ALBERTATo: Law Society of Alberta
From: Brian M. Samuels, Barrister and Solicitor (BC) & Gail Davidson, Executive Director, LRWC
2009-05-14
Re: Robert P. Lee, a member of the Law Society of Alberta
To: Jennifer Rothery, Discipline Hearing Coordinator, and Heather Ross, Chair of Law Society of Upper Canada
From: Brian M. Samuels, member of LRWC, and Gail Davidson, Executive Director of LRWC
2009-02-18
Re: Robert P. Lee, Lawyer
To: the Right Honorable Premier Ed Stelmach, and others
From: Brian M. Samuels, executive director, LRWCR:::
Friday, January 01, 2010
Happy New Year
All the best, especially to anyone who can bring these brave men and women home before the next new year.
Wednesday, December 09, 2009
KVELLO V. MIAZGA
Litigators alarmed at new rules on Crown liability
By Tim Shufelt | Publication Date: Monday, 07 December 2009
Monday, November 16, 2009
Cornwall Inquiry Commissioner provides update on release of report
Cornwall Public Inquiry will be released to the public at 11 a.m. on Tuesday, Dec. 15, 2009
The public release will take place at the Ramada Inn (Simon Fraser Ballroom), 805 Brookdale Ave. in Cornwall. At 11 a.m., Commissioner Glaude will deliver a statement, following which, the Report will be available on the Inquiry’s website
KVELLO V. MIAZGA - Are the judges scamming the judges?
“Several judges at both the trial and appellate levels in the criminal proceedings accepted and relied upon the same allegations by the children in convicting their biological parents.”
I think that Canadians believe that the judges of the Supreme Court are very intelligent people. I also think that most Canadians who knew the facts of these cases would be questioning the wisdom of these seven judges after reading the above stupidity and the other lies about the children’s parents and Donald White.
Could it be that two of the seven judges are doing the lying and the other five judges are just nodding their heads in agreement. Keep in mind that the Ross, Ross & White case was sealed in Saskatchewan.
When a previous related case (R v Johanna Lucas) involving Saskatoon Police officer Brian Dueck was heard by some of these same judges they bragged about not reading the documents and praised Mr Dueck. Brian Dueck was the police officer that left the children, two 8 year old twin girls to be raped and tortured with a knife by their brother in the Thompson foster home. This evidence of sexual abuse was then documented as ritual abuse by medical doctors and Brian Duck charged 16 innocent people with ritual sex abuse of the children.
Johanna Lucas was attempting to get some help for the children. Brian Dueck with the help of Justice Hrabinsly jailed her to shut her up. I can understand why these Supreme Court judges would not want the public to hear about their travesty of justice when they jailed her. Fact is that anyone who bothered to read the documents as Johanna Lucas did knew what was happening to the twin girls in the foster home. This explains why the judges bragged about not reading the documents.
The judges are relying on the fact that no one would believe that a Canadian judge could convict three innocent people of the incredible ritual sex abuse evidence presented to Justice Batten. When the Thompson papers disclosed the sex abuse of the twin girls in their foster home during the Ross, Ross & White trial the R,. R. & Witchcraft trial continued. The girls were left to be raped and tortured for over four years. The court was out to save the children of Saskatoon from being barbecued and eaten in a satanic ritual.
Justice William Vancise was one of the three judges who heard the Ross, Ross, & White Appeal.
Globe and Mail
June 17, 1995 , by David Roberts The Globe and Mail, Saskatoon
Martensville Redux
“In the Court of Appeal ruling, a dissenting view was given by a third judge, Mr. Justice William Vancise, who said the convictions were unreasonable and must be quashed. He called the allegations "bizarre" tales that "strained the bounds of credibility" and he found "serious doubt" as to the guilt of the accused.
Moreover the trio did not have a trial in which "the legal rules have been observed." He said the youngsters appeared to be abused all right -- but not necessarily by those sentenced to penitentiary time.”
How could the judges ignore the above?
Sunday, November 15, 2009
KVELLO V. MIAZGA - The judges are lying to us.
The judges are lying to us in both written judgments, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal and Supreme Court. The only sexual abuse that is documented and true happened to the children in the Thompson foster home during and after the Ross, Ross & White case.
Both courts are attempting to rewrite history with respect to the Ross, Ross & White case. The judges are claiming that Helen Ross and Donald White sexually abused the children. The media is reporting and supporting these lies.
What sexual abuse are the judges talking about? We know that the defendants in the Klassen/Kvello case were not guilty. We know that Richards Klassen’s father was not guilty. He only pleaded guilty so the Crown would stay the case against the rest of his family and the other defendants.
That leaves the Ross, Ross & White case. By the time the preliminary hearing started most people had the time to realize that there was no satanic cult abusing children in Saskatoon and area. There were no dead babies being found and no reports of missing babies. Matthew Miazga knew by this time that he had been duped and was looking for a way out.
On November 28, 1991, during the Ross, Ross & White Preliminary Hearing Mr Miazga attempted to end the proceedings. Volume 1, page 715 of the Preliminary Hearing transcript is here. (link to main web site pdf file)
That was the last time that Mr Miazga had any control over the Ross, Ross & White case and the Klassen/Kvello case. It was also the last hope for people concerned about getting medical help for the Ross children who were in the Thompson foster home.
The cases along with the Ross children were now in the hands of religious nutcase social workers, police officers, lawyers and judges. The same “children do not lie” idiots who changed the laws and allowed cases to proceed without any evidence. Rule of law in Saskatchewan became, rule by idiots. In Saskatchewan they were the religious elite out to save the world’s children from being barbecued in a satanic ritual. Crazy people in charge of justice. They are still in charge. They will do anything, including gagging and sealing the Ross, Ross & White case and lying to the Canadian public about Helen Ross and Donald George White.
Are the judges lying about the children being sexually abused by Helen Ross and Donald George White because two Saskatchewan Court of Appeal Judges took 17 months to write up a sick story, page after page of sex with children that they knew could not, and did not happen. The Ross, Ross & White case needs to be unsealed.
Clearly, the now sitting judges believe that anyone acquitted or who had a new trial ordered in their court, or a higher court in the past can have the acquittal or order overturned by simply telling lies about these people in their written judgments. How many of the seven judges heard the earlier cases. Are any of them on record for protecting the reputation of a sick Saskatoon Police Officer found guilty of malice. How about for bragging about not reading the material only to find out in later cases they had been lied to by officers of the court.
Helen Ross and Donald White did not sexually abuse the children and this is supported by the court documents. Judges lying about them is disgusting and places the court into disrepute in the eyes of the public. Judges knowingly lying about a Canadian veteran and war hero does not just place the court into disrepute. The court is the highest authority in the country for the protection of our freedom. These judges do not understand what every child in Canada knows. Who put their lives on the line for our freedom? The Chief justice of the Supreme Court of Canada needs to resign. If she doesn’t the parliament of Canada has a duty to remove her. She is not the highest authority in Canada. She is a disgrace and embarrassment.
Saturday, November 14, 2009
The Globe and Mail. Lies and B.S. The boyfriend. Part 1
Globe editorial
Credulity is not malice
“Separate charges against the biological parents and the mother's boyfriend reached the Supreme Court, which found the children's evidence in those cases credible.”
The “boyfriend” has a name. His name was Donald George White. A proud second world war veteran who displayed his medals on his living room wall.
I have been looking for some of the credible evidence that the judges of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal and seven judges of the Supreme Court of Canada claim exists. There is none and the judges know this.
This is a link to a article published on the injusticebusters web site.
Globe and Mail
June 17, 1995 , by David Roberts The Globe and Mail, Saskatoon
Martensville Redux
Is this the credible evidence the editorial is speaking about?
"The kids said they were cut with knives, forced to take part in sex acts with as many as 40 adults, with dogs and flying bats. They were regularly made to eat a mixture of "poop" and raw fish shaped like Easter bunnies. Once, between sessions of eating eyeballs, their parents forced them to watch the neighbours' baby being skinned, buried, dug up, then roasted and eaten.
One of the traumatized youngsters admitted in a Saskatchewan court that the neighbours at first were very angry when their baby was eaten, but later decided to forget all about it.
But the Saskatoon police didn't forget.
Despite the fact that police found no bodies (they didn't look) and received no reports of missing infants, some 40 men, women and children (almost anyone who had contact with the three children) were investigated.
Eventually more than 16 people were charged with more than 60 counts of sexually abusing the children. The Crown was later forced to abandon the case against 12 of them for lack of evidence, while four were convicted and sentenced to jail terms of three to six years. Three of the four are out on bail while appealing their sentences to the Supreme Court of Canada."
Donald White was one of the three.
“’Critics say the reputation of the Department of Justice will be difficult to restore -- particularly when people are convicted in secret. In the foster-child cases, core evidence was delivered in virtual secret since the courts, to protect the young complainants, cleared the public from the courtroom during their testimony. After three of the four convictions, one judge ordered all transcripts of the case forever sealed from public scrutiny.”
Donald White was convicted in this court.
“The foster-children's case involves a supplementary issue. Saskatoon resident John Lucas, who complained about police tactics in the matter, has just been jailed for defamatory libel; his wife Johanna has been found guilty of the same offense and is appealing. (Three others were also charged with libel.)
Critics say something is amiss, terribly amiss, in the administration of justice in Saskatchewan when people such as Mr. Lucas are jailed for expressing their opinion.”
Johanna Lucas did not complain about “police tactics”. She demanded that someone do something to help all three Ross children in the Thompson foster home. She was jailed to shut her up and no one from the news media did anything to help her. The Ross twins settled their claim against the Government of Saskatchewan and others in July 2006 for $560,000. Johanna Lucas was jailed and the twins brother was allowed to continue to rape his sisters in the Thompson foster home for over four years.
“In the Court of Appeal ruling, a dissenting view was given by a third judge, Mr. Justice William Vancise, who said the convictions were unreasonable and must be quashed. He called the allegations "bizarre" tales that "strained the bounds of credibility" and he found "serious doubt" as to the guilt of the accused.
Moreover the trio did not have a trial in which "the legal rules have been observed." He said the youngsters appeared to be abused all right -- but not necessarily by those sentenced to penitentiary time.”
The above was printed in the Globe and Mail. The only thing that changed over the years is that seven judges of the Supreme Court of Canada lied in their written judgement. Same thing in the written judgment of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal. The editor knows that there was no credible evidence. The editor knows that Donald White was acquitted.
There is a vast amount of evidence that Donald White, and Helen Ross were victims of injustice and a cover-up involving judges of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal and the judges of the Supreme Court of Canada. What did a justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench think about Donald White’s trial. Part 2.